What is GWT and what are its top alternatives?
Google Web Toolkit (GWT) is a comprehensive framework that allows developers to build and optimize complex web applications in Java. It offers features like cross-browser compatibility, rich user interfaces, and code reusability. However, GWT has limitations in terms of performance optimization and lacks modern JavaScript framework integrations.
Vaadin: Vaadin is a Java framework for building modern web applications that provides a complete set of customizable UI components. It offers a seamless integration with popular Java IDEs and tools. Pros: Rapid application development, rich component library. Cons: Steeper learning curve than GWT.
AngularDart: AngularDart is a web app framework based on Dart and Angular that allows for building high-performance web applications. Key features include two-way data binding and dependency injection. Pros: Better performance, deep integration with Angular ecosystem. Cons: Limited Java support compared to GWT.
ReactJS: React is a JavaScript library for building user interfaces that focuses on single-page applications. It offers a component-based architecture and virtual DOM for efficient rendering. Pros: Lightweight, vibrant community support. Cons: Requires additional tooling for full-stack development like servlets in GWT.
Vue.js: Vue.js is a progressive JavaScript framework for building interactive web interfaces. It features a simple and flexible API and is lightweight compared to other frameworks. Pros: Easy to learn, gradual integration into existing projects. Cons: Less mature ecosystem than GWT.
Polymer: Polymer is a JavaScript library that simplifies building web applications using Web Components. It provides a set of ready-to-use elements for fast development. Pros: Encourages component-based architecture, enhances reusability. Cons: Requires familiarity with Web Components standards.
Lit: Lit is a lightweight library for building fast, lightweight web components using lit-html templating. It prioritizes performance and functionality, making it suitable for scalable applications. Pros: Minimalist approach, efficient DOM updates. Cons: Limited documentation compared to GWT.
Thymeleaf: Thymeleaf is a modern server-side Java template engine for web and standalone environments. It offers natural template semantics and integrates well with popular Java frameworks. Pros: Seamless integration with Java ecosystem, easy to learn. Cons: Limited support for complex client-side interactions compared to GWT.
Svelte: Svelte is a radical new approach to building web applications with JavaScript that compiles code that updates the DOM when the state changes. It eliminates the need for a virtual DOM, resulting in leaner and faster applications. Pros: Minimal boilerplate, high performance. Cons: Relatively new, smaller community compared to GWT.
Grails: Grails is a full-stack web development framework for the JVM that combines the power of Groovy and Spring Boot. It simplifies Java web development by providing convention over configuration and seamless integration with popular Java tools. Pros: Rapid development, extensive plugin ecosystem. Cons: Might be overkill for smaller applications compared to GWT.
Play Framework: Play Framework is a lightweight, stateless web application framework that supports Java and Scala. It offers high development productivity with built-in testing and development tools. Pros: Scalability, asynchronous I/O support. Cons: Steeper learning curve for Java developers transitioning from GWT.
Top Alternatives to GWT
- JavaFX
It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms. ...
- Vaadin
It is the fastest way to build web applications in Java. It automates the communication between your server and the browser and gives you a high-level component API for all Vaadin components ...
- Angular
It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications. ...
- Spring
A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments. ...
- Dart
Dart is a cohesive, scalable platform for building apps that run on the web (where you can use Polymer) or on servers (such as with Google Cloud Platform). Use the Dart language, libraries, and tools to write anything from simple scripts to full-featured apps. ...
- React
Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project. ...
- JSF
It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community ...
- Blazor
Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML. ...
GWT alternatives & related posts
- Light10
- Community support less than qt1
- Complicated1
related JavaFX posts
Hi experts, I need to write a GUI app that would configure a .json file. I am considering it to be cross-platform with as much as less dependency as possible i.e. once build/compiled, it should be running on the maximum number of OS platforms without re-building or re-compiling. So up till now, I've shortlisted 3 selected frameworks. The Swingvy was to be Java Swing but was not in the list. And after reading some stuff, I think that Java Swing or JavaFX should do the job. But I need suggestions/opinions from you experts, which would be a great help in order to achieve a precise decision. Any help/suggestion would be really appreciated. Thanks a bunch
I create desktop applications that use a database for storing data. My applications are used as management tools in supermarkets, stores, warehouses, and other places. I don't know which one to use; Electron or JavaFX. Can anyone advise me on this matter?
- Java9
- Compatibility7
- Components6
- Open Source6
- Performance3
- Example packages2
- Abstraction2
- OSGI Support1
- Paid for more features3
related Vaadin posts
- It's a powerful framework109
- Straight-forward architecture53
- TypeScript48
- Great UI and Business Logic separation45
- Powerful, maintainable, fast40
- Amazing CLI39
- Great mvc33
- Powerfull Dependency Injection29
- Easy to build19
- All in one Framework16
- Opinionated, batteries-included approach15
- Schematics11
- Solid Standard Setup.10
- Structured8
- Performance7
- Complex5
- Only for single page applications4
- Builders3
- RxJS2
- Ng upgrade2
- React1
- Overcomplicated9
- Large overhead in file size and initialization time9
- Ugly code2
- CLI not open to other test and linting tools2
related Angular posts
One TypeScript / Angular 2 code health recommendation at Google is how to simplify dealing with RxJS Observable
s. Two common options in Angular are subscribing to an Observable
inside of a Component's TypeScript code, versus using something like the AsyncPipe
(foo | async
) from the template html. We typically recommend the latter for most straightforward use cases (code without side effects, etc.)
I typically review a fair amount of Angular code at work. One thing I typically encourage is using plain Observable
s in an Angular Component, and using AsyncPipe
(foo | async
) from the template html to handle subscription, rather than directly subscribing to an observable in a component TS file.
Subscribing in components
Unless you know a subscription you're starting in a component is very finite (e.g. an HTTP request with no retry logic, etc), subscriptions you make in a Component must:
- Be closed, stopped, or cancelled when exiting a component (e.g. when navigating away from a page),
- Only be opened (subscribed) when a component is actually loaded/visible (i.e. in ngOnInit rather than in a constructor).
AsyncPipe
can take care of that for you
Instead of manually implementing component lifecycle hooks, remembering to subscribe and unsubscribe to an Observable, AsyncPipe
can do that for you.
I'm sharing a version of this recommendation with some best practices and code samples.
#Typescript #Angular #RXJS #Async #Frontend
We are in the process of building a modern content platform to deliver our content through various channels. We decided to go with Microservices architecture as we wanted scale. Microservice architecture style is an approach to developing an application as a suite of small independently deployable services built around specific business capabilities. You can gain modularity, extensive parallelism and cost-effective scaling by deploying services across many distributed servers. Microservices modularity facilitates independent updates/deployments, and helps to avoid single point of failure, which can help prevent large-scale outages. We also decided to use Event Driven Architecture pattern which is a popular distributed asynchronous architecture pattern used to produce highly scalable applications. The event-driven architecture is made up of highly decoupled, single-purpose event processing components that asynchronously receive and process events.
To build our #Backend capabilities we decided to use the following: 1. #Microservices - Java with Spring Boot , Node.js with ExpressJS and Python with Flask 2. #Eventsourcingframework - Amazon Kinesis , Amazon Kinesis Firehose , Amazon SNS , Amazon SQS, AWS Lambda 3. #Data - Amazon RDS , Amazon DynamoDB , Amazon S3 , MongoDB Atlas
To build #Webapps we decided to use Angular 2 with RxJS
#Devops - GitHub , Travis CI , Terraform , Docker , Serverless
Spring
- Java230
- Open source157
- Great community136
- Very powerful123
- Enterprise114
- Lot of great subprojects64
- Easy setup60
- Convention , configuration, done44
- Standard40
- Love the logic31
- Good documentation13
- Dependency injection11
- Stability11
- MVC9
- Easy6
- Makes the hard stuff fun & the easy stuff automatic3
- Strong typing3
- Code maintenance2
- Best practices2
- Maven2
- Great Desgin2
- Easy Integration with Spring Security2
- Integrations with most other Java frameworks2
- Java has more support and more libraries1
- Supports vast databases1
- Large ecosystem with seamless integration1
- OracleDb integration1
- Live project1
- Draws you into its own ecosystem and bloat15
- Verbose configuration3
- Poor documentation3
- Java3
- Java is more verbose language in compare to python2
related Spring posts
Is learning Spring and Spring Boot for web apps back-end development is still relevant in 2021? Feel free to share your views with comparison to Django/Node.js/ ExpressJS or other frameworks.
Please share some good beginner resources to start learning about spring/spring boot framework to build the web apps.
I am consulting for a company that wants to move its current CubeCart e-commerce site to another PHP based platform like PrestaShop or Magento. I was interested in alternatives that utilize Node.js as the primary platform. I currently don't know PHP, but I have done full stack dev with Java, Spring, Thymeleaf, etc.. I am just unsure that learning a set of technologies not commonly used makes sense. For example, in PrestaShop, I would need to work with JavaScript better and learn PHP, Twig, and Bootstrap. It seems more cumbersome than a Node JS system, where the language syntax stays the same for the full stack. I am looking for thoughts and advice on the relevance of PHP skillset into the future AND whether the Node based e-commerce open source options can compete with Magento or Prestashop.
Dart
- Backed by Google59
- Flutter53
- Twice the speed of Javascript39
- Great tools35
- Scalable30
- Open source27
- Made for the future26
- Can be used on Frontend25
- Polymer Dart22
- Angular Dart22
- Cross platform18
- Like Java16
- Easy to learn14
- Dartanalyzer13
- Runs on Google Cloud Platform12
- Easy to Understand10
- Amazing concurrency primitives9
- Is to JS what C is to ASM8
- Flutter works with darts7
- R3
- Can run Dart in AWS Lambda3
- Looks familiar, with purposely implemented features1
- Lack of ORM3
- Locked in - JS or TS interop is very hard to accomplish3
- A0
related Dart posts
The only two programming languages I know are Python and Dart, I fall in love with Dart when I learned about the type safeness, ease of refactoring, and the help of the IDE. I have an idea for an app, a simple app, but I need SEO and server rendering, and I also want it to be available on all platforms. I can't use Flutter or Dart anymore because of that. I have been searching and looks like there is no way to avoid learning HTML and CSS for this. I want to use Supabase as BASS, at the moment I think that I have two options if I want to learn the least amount of things because of my lack of time available:
Quasar Framework: They claim that I can do all the things I need, but I have to use JavaScript, and I am going to have all those bugs with a type-safe programming language avoidable. I guess I can use TypeScript?, but that means learning both, and I am not sure if I will be able to use 100% Typescript. Besides Vue.js, Node.js, etc.
Blazor and .NET: There is MAUI with razor bindings in .Net now, and also a Blazor server. And as far as I can see, the transition from Dart to C# will be easy. I guess that I have to learn some Javascript here and there, but I have to less things I guess, am I wrong? But Blazor is a new technology, Vue is widely used.
Hi, I'm considering building a social marketplace app on android, ios and web, Flutter seems to be a good UI framework for cross-platform apps, it's safe type, hot reload, and native compiling on native machine code (thanks to Dart). My question is, for an MVP product is it a good choice? if yes, will it be on the mid-term, long term? Or will I have to change as the users grow?
thank you
- Components830
- Virtual dom672
- Performance578
- Simplicity507
- Composable442
- Data flow186
- Declarative166
- Isn't an mvc framework128
- Reactive updates120
- Explicit app state115
- JSX50
- Learn once, write everywhere29
- Easy to Use22
- Uni-directional data flow21
- Works great with Flux Architecture17
- Great perfomance11
- Javascript10
- Built by Facebook9
- TypeScript support8
- Speed6
- Server Side Rendering6
- Feels like the 90s5
- Excellent Documentation5
- Props5
- Functional5
- Easy as Lego5
- Closer to standard JavaScript and HTML than others5
- Cross-platform5
- Easy to start5
- Hooks5
- Awesome5
- Scalable5
- Super easy4
- Allows creating single page applications4
- Server side views4
- Sdfsdfsdf4
- Start simple4
- Strong Community4
- Fancy third party tools4
- Scales super well4
- Has arrow functions3
- Beautiful and Neat Component Management3
- Just the View of MVC3
- Simple, easy to reason about and makes you productive3
- Fast evolving3
- SSR3
- Great migration pathway for older systems3
- Rich ecosystem3
- Simple3
- Has functional components3
- Every decision architecture wise makes sense3
- Very gentle learning curve3
- Split your UI into components with one true state2
- Recharts2
- Permissively-licensed2
- Fragments2
- Sharable2
- Image upload2
- HTML-like2
- React hooks1
- Datatables1
- Requires discipline to keep architecture organized40
- No predefined way to structure your app29
- Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages28
- JSX13
- Not enterprise friendly10
- One-way binding only6
- State consistency with backend neglected3
- Bad Documentation3
- Error boundary is needed2
- Paradigms change too fast2
related React posts
I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go.
I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free!
I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling.
Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting. I did some research and I found Netlify. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.
Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master.
With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent.
If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost.
Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.
But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.
But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.
Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.
- Rich and comprehensive Request Life-cycle2
- Very Mature UI framework1
- Server Side component1
related JSF posts
Hello guys, my first time here, and for requesting advice.
I am a JavaScript Developer MERN Stack with a focus on Frontend Development. I wanna go more to Backend Development.
Which Language has a Solid Ecosystem and not so many changes like JavaScript Frontend, quite Frankly that's freaking me out nowadays!
In my Location Germany Industries, Finance, Utilities, Insurances, Retails, and Healthcare dominate Java in the Backend. In my case Java is the logical choice BUT, XML, old codebase, JSP/JSF , boring and verbose syntax without Syntactic Sugar, test Battle, and so on make me crazy.
I have Java, Python, Golang, and Node.js/TypeScript as a choice, but because of a lack of Backend knowledge, I can't make a decision. Which Language and Ecosystem should I learn and master for a long time, my Goal is to work with a selected stack for 10+ years and I don't do Data Science only Software Engineering.
Thanks for reading and Advice! Important! !!! I see via Email somebody send me an Advice, but unfortunately i can't see/read your Advice here :( Users like: Jose Manuel Ortega or nullStack65....
Hello guys! I would ask for your advice. Our situation is like that there will be a project to revamp workflows and introduce new services like mobile apps, machine learning, and some online services that would use cloud storage. We use JSF, JavaScript, Ajax, Spring, Oracle 12c running on Linux (VM) and providing online services to internal users and the public. But, we are not technically savvy enough to evaluate what tools should be introduced. Personally, I am evaluating whether to take this opportunity to change our practice/PM approach from Prince to Scrum/Agile (It seemed that DevOps is popular) ... Since we adopt ISO 27001 and ISO 20000, security is a crucial factor that we consider. Would you please help to recommend a list of tools and explain the reasons why you recommend them? Thanks in advance~!
Blazor
- Uses C#62
- No need to learn separate language or technology48
- Supports making a single page application41
- Tight integration with .NET project39
- Uses .NET standard library37
- Very little JavaScript required30
- Components29
- Shared classes between client and server27
- No need to compile, bundle and deploy separately27
- Cross Platform24
- Has Server AND Client hosting models21
- Very easy JavaScript interop if required18
- Third party state management i.e. Blazor-State17
- App state can be managed singleton objects14
- Portable Code across Mobile, Web and Desktop4
- Work with Electron/MAUI2
- Initial load time4
- Hard to inject javascript2
related Blazor posts
The only two programming languages I know are Python and Dart, I fall in love with Dart when I learned about the type safeness, ease of refactoring, and the help of the IDE. I have an idea for an app, a simple app, but I need SEO and server rendering, and I also want it to be available on all platforms. I can't use Flutter or Dart anymore because of that. I have been searching and looks like there is no way to avoid learning HTML and CSS for this. I want to use Supabase as BASS, at the moment I think that I have two options if I want to learn the least amount of things because of my lack of time available:
Quasar Framework: They claim that I can do all the things I need, but I have to use JavaScript, and I am going to have all those bugs with a type-safe programming language avoidable. I guess I can use TypeScript?, but that means learning both, and I am not sure if I will be able to use 100% Typescript. Besides Vue.js, Node.js, etc.
Blazor and .NET: There is MAUI with razor bindings in .Net now, and also a Blazor server. And as far as I can see, the transition from Dart to C# will be easy. I guess that I have to learn some Javascript here and there, but I have to less things I guess, am I wrong? But Blazor is a new technology, Vue is widely used.