Alternatives to Amazon Personalize logo

Alternatives to Amazon Personalize

TensorFlow, Keras, PyTorch, scikit-learn, and Azure Machine Learning are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Amazon Personalize.
14
46
+ 1
0

What is Amazon Personalize and what are its top alternatives?

Machine learning service that makes it easy for developers to add individualized recommendations to customers using their applications.
Amazon Personalize is a tool in the Machine Learning as a Service category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Amazon Personalize

  • TensorFlow

    TensorFlow

    TensorFlow is an open source software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. Nodes in the graph represent mathematical operations, while the graph edges represent the multidimensional data arrays (tensors) communicated between them. The flexible architecture allows you to deploy computation to one or more CPUs or GPUs in a desktop, server, or mobile device with a single API. ...

  • Keras

    Keras

    Deep Learning library for Python. Convnets, recurrent neural networks, and more. Runs on TensorFlow or Theano. https://keras.io/ ...

  • PyTorch

    PyTorch

    PyTorch is not a Python binding into a monolothic C++ framework. It is built to be deeply integrated into Python. You can use it naturally like you would use numpy / scipy / scikit-learn etc. ...

  • scikit-learn

    scikit-learn

    scikit-learn is a Python module for machine learning built on top of SciPy and distributed under the 3-Clause BSD license. ...

  • Azure Machine Learning

    Azure Machine Learning

    Azure Machine Learning is a fully-managed cloud service that enables data scientists and developers to efficiently embed predictive analytics into their applications, helping organizations use massive data sets and bring all the benefits of the cloud to machine learning. ...

  • Amazon SageMaker

    Amazon SageMaker

    A fully-managed service that enables developers and data scientists to quickly and easily build, train, and deploy machine learning models at any scale. ...

  • CUDA

    CUDA

    A parallel computing platform and application programming interface model,it enables developers to speed up compute-intensive applications by harnessing the power of GPUs for the parallelizable part of the computation. ...

  • Amazon Machine Learning

    Amazon Machine Learning

    This new AWS service helps you to use all of that data you鈥檝e been collecting to improve the quality of your decisions. You can build and fine-tune predictive models using large amounts of data, and then use Amazon Machine Learning to make predictions (in batch mode or in real-time) at scale. You can benefit from machine learning even if you don鈥檛 have an advanced degree in statistics or the desire to setup, run, and maintain your own processing and storage infrastructure. ...

Amazon Personalize alternatives & related posts

TensorFlow logo

TensorFlow

2.5K
2.7K
76
Open Source Software Library for Machine Intelligence
2.5K
2.7K
+ 1
76
PROS OF TENSORFLOW
  • 24
    High Performance
  • 16
    Connect Research and Production
  • 13
    Deep Flexibility
  • 9
    Auto-Differentiation
  • 9
    True Portability
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 2
    High level abstraction
  • 1
    Powerful
CONS OF TENSORFLOW
  • 8
    Hard
  • 5
    Hard to debug
  • 1
    Documentation not very helpful

related TensorFlow posts

Conor Myhrvold
Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber | 8 upvotes 路 1.2M views

Why we built an open source, distributed training framework for TensorFlow , Keras , and PyTorch:

At Uber, we apply deep learning across our business; from self-driving research to trip forecasting and fraud prevention, deep learning enables our engineers and data scientists to create better experiences for our users.

TensorFlow has become a preferred deep learning library at Uber for a variety of reasons. To start, the framework is one of the most widely used open source frameworks for deep learning, which makes it easy to onboard new users. It also combines high performance with an ability to tinker with low-level model details鈥攆or instance, we can use both high-level APIs, such as Keras, and implement our own custom operators using NVIDIA鈥檚 CUDA toolkit.

Uber has introduced Michelangelo (https://eng.uber.com/michelangelo/), an internal ML-as-a-service platform that democratizes machine learning and makes it easy to build and deploy these systems at scale. In this article, we pull back the curtain on Horovod, an open source component of Michelangelo鈥檚 deep learning toolkit which makes it easier to start鈥攁nd speed up鈥攄istributed deep learning projects with TensorFlow:

https://eng.uber.com/horovod/

(Direct GitHub repo: https://github.com/uber/horovod)

See more

In mid-2015, Uber began exploring ways to scale ML across the organization, avoiding ML anti-patterns while standardizing workflows and tools. This effort led to Michelangelo.

Michelangelo consists of a mix of open source systems and components built in-house. The primary open sourced components used are HDFS, Spark, Samza, Cassandra, MLLib, XGBoost, and TensorFlow.

!

See more
Keras logo

Keras

871
905
12
Deep Learning library for Theano and TensorFlow
871
905
+ 1
12
PROS OF KERAS
  • 5
    Quality Documentation
  • 4
    Easy and fast NN prototyping
  • 3
    Supports Tensorflow and Theano backends
CONS OF KERAS
  • 3
    Hard to debug

related Keras posts

Conor Myhrvold
Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber | 8 upvotes 路 1.2M views

Why we built an open source, distributed training framework for TensorFlow , Keras , and PyTorch:

At Uber, we apply deep learning across our business; from self-driving research to trip forecasting and fraud prevention, deep learning enables our engineers and data scientists to create better experiences for our users.

TensorFlow has become a preferred deep learning library at Uber for a variety of reasons. To start, the framework is one of the most widely used open source frameworks for deep learning, which makes it easy to onboard new users. It also combines high performance with an ability to tinker with low-level model details鈥攆or instance, we can use both high-level APIs, such as Keras, and implement our own custom operators using NVIDIA鈥檚 CUDA toolkit.

Uber has introduced Michelangelo (https://eng.uber.com/michelangelo/), an internal ML-as-a-service platform that democratizes machine learning and makes it easy to build and deploy these systems at scale. In this article, we pull back the curtain on Horovod, an open source component of Michelangelo鈥檚 deep learning toolkit which makes it easier to start鈥攁nd speed up鈥攄istributed deep learning projects with TensorFlow:

https://eng.uber.com/horovod/

(Direct GitHub repo: https://github.com/uber/horovod)

See more

I am going to send my website to a Venture Capitalist for inspection. If I succeed, I will get funding for my StartUp! This website is based on Django and Uses Keras and TensorFlow model to predict medical imaging. Should I use Heroku or PythonAnywhere to deploy my website ?? Best Regards, Adarsh.

See more
PyTorch logo

PyTorch

870
965
33
A deep learning framework that puts Python first
870
965
+ 1
33
PROS OF PYTORCH
  • 11
    Easy to use
  • 9
    Developer Friendly
  • 8
    Easy to debug
  • 5
    Sometimes faster than TensorFlow
CONS OF PYTORCH
  • 2
    Lots of code

related PyTorch posts

Server side

We decided to use Python for our backend because it is one of the industry standard languages for data analysis and machine learning. It also has a lot of support due to its large user base.

  • Web Server: We chose Flask because we want to keep our machine learning / data analysis and the web server in the same language. Flask is easy to use and we all have experience with it. Postman will be used for creating and testing APIs due to its convenience.

  • Machine Learning: We decided to go with PyTorch for machine learning since it is one of the most popular libraries. It is also known to have an easier learning curve than other popular libraries such as Tensorflow. This is important because our team lacks ML experience and learning the tool as fast as possible would increase productivity.

  • Data Analysis: Some common Python libraries will be used to analyze our data. These include NumPy, Pandas , and matplotlib. These tools combined will help us learn the properties and characteristics of our data. Jupyter notebook will be used to help organize the data analysis process, and improve the code readability.

Client side

  • UI: We decided to use React for the UI because it helps organize the data and variables of the application into components, making it very convenient to maintain our dashboard. Since React is one of the most popular front end frameworks right now, there will be a lot of support for it as well as a lot of potential new hires that are familiar with the framework. CSS 3 and HTML5 will be used for the basic styling and structure of the web app, as they are the most widely used front end languages.

  • State Management: We decided to use Redux to manage the state of the application since it works naturally to React. Our team also already has experience working with Redux which gave it a slight edge over the other state management libraries.

  • Data Visualization: We decided to use the React-based library Victory to visualize the data. They have very user friendly documentation on their official website which we find easy to learn from.

Cache

  • Caching: We decided between Redis and memcached because they are two of the most popular open-source cache engines. We ultimately decided to use Redis to improve our web app performance mainly due to the extra functionalities it provides such as fine-tuning cache contents and durability.

Database

  • Database: We decided to use a NoSQL database over a relational database because of its flexibility from not having a predefined schema. The user behavior analytics has to be flexible since the data we plan to store may change frequently. We decided on MongoDB because it is lightweight and we can easily host the database with MongoDB Atlas . Everyone on our team also has experience working with MongoDB.

Infrastructure

  • Deployment: We decided to use Heroku over AWS, Azure, Google Cloud because it is free. Although there are advantages to the other cloud services, Heroku makes the most sense to our team because our primary goal is to build an MVP.

Other Tools

  • Communication Slack will be used as the primary source of communication. It provides all the features needed for basic discussions. In terms of more interactive meetings, Zoom will be used for its video calls and screen sharing capabilities.

  • Source Control The project will be stored on GitHub and all code changes will be done though pull requests. This will help us keep the codebase clean and make it easy to revert changes when we need to.

See more
Conor Myhrvold
Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber | 8 upvotes 路 1.2M views

Why we built an open source, distributed training framework for TensorFlow , Keras , and PyTorch:

At Uber, we apply deep learning across our business; from self-driving research to trip forecasting and fraud prevention, deep learning enables our engineers and data scientists to create better experiences for our users.

TensorFlow has become a preferred deep learning library at Uber for a variety of reasons. To start, the framework is one of the most widely used open source frameworks for deep learning, which makes it easy to onboard new users. It also combines high performance with an ability to tinker with low-level model details鈥攆or instance, we can use both high-level APIs, such as Keras, and implement our own custom operators using NVIDIA鈥檚 CUDA toolkit.

Uber has introduced Michelangelo (https://eng.uber.com/michelangelo/), an internal ML-as-a-service platform that democratizes machine learning and makes it easy to build and deploy these systems at scale. In this article, we pull back the curtain on Horovod, an open source component of Michelangelo鈥檚 deep learning toolkit which makes it easier to start鈥攁nd speed up鈥攄istributed deep learning projects with TensorFlow:

https://eng.uber.com/horovod/

(Direct GitHub repo: https://github.com/uber/horovod)

See more
scikit-learn logo

scikit-learn

833
884
32
Easy-to-use and general-purpose machine learning in Python
833
884
+ 1
32
PROS OF SCIKIT-LEARN
  • 18
    Scientific computing
  • 14
    Easy
CONS OF SCIKIT-LEARN
  • 1
    Limited

related scikit-learn posts

Azure Machine Learning logo

Azure Machine Learning

194
279
0
A fully-managed cloud service for predictive analytics
194
279
+ 1
0
PROS OF AZURE MACHINE LEARNING
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF AZURE MACHINE LEARNING
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Azure Machine Learning posts

      Amazon SageMaker logo

      Amazon SageMaker

      187
      215
      0
      Accelerated Machine Learning
      187
      215
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF AMAZON SAGEMAKER
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF AMAZON SAGEMAKER
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Amazon SageMaker posts

          Julien DeFrance
          Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter | 2 upvotes 路 46.3K views

          Which #IaaS / #PaaS to chose? Not all #Cloud providers are created equal. As you start to use one or the other, you'll build around very specific services that don't have their equivalent elsewhere.

          Back in 2014/2015, this decision I made for SmartZip was a no-brainer and #AWS won. AWS has been a leader, and over the years demonstrated their capacity to innovate, and reducing toil. Like no other.

          Year after year, this kept on being confirmed, as they rolled out new (managed) services, got into Serverless with AWS Lambda / FaaS And allowed domains such as #AI / #MachineLearning to be put into the hands of every developers thanks to Amazon Machine Learning or Amazon SageMaker for instance.

          Should you compare with #GCP for instance, it's not quite there yet. Building around these managed services, #AWS allowed me to get my developers on a whole new level. Where they know what's under the hood. Where they know they have these services available and can build around them. Where they care and are responsible for operations and security and deployment of what they've worked on.

          See more

          Amazon SageMaker constricts the use of their own mxnet package and does not offer a strong Kubernetes backbone. At the same time, Kubeflow is still quite buggy and cumbersome to use. Which tool is a better pick for MLOps pipelines (both from the perspective of scalability and depth)?

          See more
          CUDA logo

          CUDA

          155
          112
          0
          It provides everything you need to develop GPU-accelerated applications
          155
          112
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF CUDA
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF CUDA
              Be the first to leave a con

              related CUDA posts

              Amazon Machine Learning logo

              Amazon Machine Learning

              139
              213
              0
              Visualization tools and wizards that guide you through the process of creating ML models w/o having to learn...
              139
              213
              + 1
              0
              PROS OF AMAZON MACHINE LEARNING
                Be the first to leave a pro
                CONS OF AMAZON MACHINE LEARNING
                  Be the first to leave a con

                  related Amazon Machine Learning posts

                  Julien DeFrance
                  Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter | 2 upvotes 路 46.3K views

                  Which #IaaS / #PaaS to chose? Not all #Cloud providers are created equal. As you start to use one or the other, you'll build around very specific services that don't have their equivalent elsewhere.

                  Back in 2014/2015, this decision I made for SmartZip was a no-brainer and #AWS won. AWS has been a leader, and over the years demonstrated their capacity to innovate, and reducing toil. Like no other.

                  Year after year, this kept on being confirmed, as they rolled out new (managed) services, got into Serverless with AWS Lambda / FaaS And allowed domains such as #AI / #MachineLearning to be put into the hands of every developers thanks to Amazon Machine Learning or Amazon SageMaker for instance.

                  Should you compare with #GCP for instance, it's not quite there yet. Building around these managed services, #AWS allowed me to get my developers on a whole new level. Where they know what's under the hood. Where they know they have these services available and can build around them. Where they care and are responsible for operations and security and deployment of what they've worked on.

                  See more