StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Back4App vs Heroku

Back4App vs Heroku

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Heroku
Heroku
Stacks25.8K
Followers20.5K
Votes3.2K
Back4App
Back4App
Stacks31
Followers120
Votes18

Back4App vs Heroku: What are the differences?

Introduction

Back4App and Heroku are both cloud-based platforms that allow developers to deploy and manage their applications. While they have some similarities, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Pricing: Back4App offers a freemium model where users can start with a free plan before moving on to paid plans based on their needs. Heroku, on the other hand, follows a pay-as-you-go model with flexible pricing options. This means that users only pay for the resources they use on Heroku, making it more cost-effective for smaller projects or startups with limited budgets.

  2. Deployment Ease: Back4App is specifically designed for hosting and deploying Parse Server applications, making it extremely easy for developers to get their applications up and running. Back4App provides a fully managed platform with pre-configured infrastructure. Heroku, on the other hand, is a general-purpose platform that supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks. While Heroku offers more flexibility, it may require additional configuration and setup for specific applications.

  3. Scalability: Back4App offers built-in scalability features, allowing applications to grow seamlessly as user demand increases. Back4App automatically manages the infrastructure and resources required to handle increasing traffic and data storage needs. Heroku also offers scalability options, but it requires manual configuration and scaling using their platform tools.

  4. Database Options: Back4App primarily uses Parse Server as its backend, which offers a NoSQL database out of the box. This makes it easy for developers to work with data without worrying about SQL queries or schema changes. Heroku, on the other hand, supports a wide range of databases including PostgreSQL, MySQL, and MongoDB. This gives developers more flexibility to choose the database that best fits their application requirements.

  5. Environment Variables: Back4App provides a user-friendly interface to manage environment variables for applications. This makes it easy to securely store sensitive information like API keys, database credentials, etc. Heroku also supports environment variables, but users need to manage them through the command line interface or dashboard.

  6. Add-ons and Integrations: Heroku has a vast marketplace of add-ons and integrations that can enhance the functionalities of your application. These range from caching services, logging tools, performance monitoring, and more. Back4App, being a more specialized platform, offers a more limited selection of add-ons and integrations.

In summary, Back4App is a more streamlined and specialized platform for hosting and deploying Parse Server applications, whereas Heroku is a general-purpose platform that supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks, making it more flexible but requiring more manual configuration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Heroku
Heroku
Back4App
Back4App

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Back4app accelerates backend development, improves development productivity, reduces time to market, and let you scale applications without managing infrastructure.

Agile deployment for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, Go and Scala.;Run and scale any type of app.;Total visibility across your entire app.;Erosion-resistant architecture. Rich control surfaces.
Database API Serveless Functions Authentication Notifications
Statistics
Stacks
25.8K
Stacks
31
Followers
20.5K
Followers
120
Votes
3.2K
Votes
18
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 703
    Easy deployment
  • 459
    Free for side projects
  • 374
    Huge time-saver
  • 348
    Simple scaling
  • 261
    Low devops skills required
Cons
  • 27
    Super expensive
  • 9
    Not a whole lot of flexibility
  • 7
    Storage
  • 7
    No usable MySQL option
  • 5
    Low performance on free tier
Pros
  • 3
    Graphql support
  • 2
    Great documentation
  • 2
    Open source backend as a service
  • 2
    Fastest and most complete backend as a service
  • 2
    Easily clone an app
Integrations
Mailgun
Mailgun
Postmark
Postmark
Loggly
Loggly
Papertrail
Papertrail
Redis Cloud
Redis Cloud
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
Logentries
Logentries
MongoLab
MongoLab
Gemfury
Gemfury
Objective-C
Objective-C
Swift
Swift
Xamarin
Xamarin
JavaScript
JavaScript
GraphQL
GraphQL
Android OS
Android OS

What are some alternatives to Heroku, Back4App?

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase