Alternatives to BigchainDB logo

Alternatives to BigchainDB

Ethereum, MongoDB, IPFS , MySQL, and PostgreSQL are the most popular alternatives and competitors to BigchainDB.
2
3
+ 1
0

What is BigchainDB and what are its top alternatives?

It is designed to merge the best of two worlds: the “traditional” distributed database world and the “traditional” blockchain world. With high throughput, low latency, powerful query functionality, decentralized control, immutable data storage and built-in asset support.
BigchainDB is a tool in the Databases category of a tech stack.
BigchainDB is an open source tool with 3.4K GitHub stars and 686 GitHub forks. Here’s a link to BigchainDB's open source repository on GitHub

BigchainDB alternatives & related posts

Ethereum logo

Ethereum

96
46
0
96
46
+ 1
0
Open source platform to write and distribute decentralized applications
    Be the first to leave a pro
    Ethereum logo
    Ethereum
    VS
    BigchainDB logo
    BigchainDB
    MongoDB logo

    MongoDB

    16.5K
    13K
    3.8K
    16.5K
    13K
    + 1
    3.8K
    The database for giant ideas
    MongoDB logo
    MongoDB
    VS
    BigchainDB logo
    BigchainDB

    related MongoDB posts

    Jeyabalaji Subramanian
    Jeyabalaji Subramanian
    CTO at FundsCorner · | 24 upvotes · 263K views
    atFundsCornerFundsCorner
    Zappa
    Zappa
    AWS Lambda
    AWS Lambda
    SQLAlchemy
    SQLAlchemy
    Python
    Python
    Amazon SQS
    Amazon SQS
    Node.js
    Node.js
    MongoDB Stitch
    MongoDB Stitch
    PostgreSQL
    PostgreSQL
    MongoDB
    MongoDB

    Recently we were looking at a few robust and cost-effective ways of replicating the data that resides in our production MongoDB to a PostgreSQL database for data warehousing and business intelligence.

    We set ourselves the following criteria for the optimal tool that would do this job: - The data replication must be near real-time, yet it should NOT impact the production database - The data replication must be horizontally scalable (based on the load), asynchronous & crash-resilient

    Based on the above criteria, we selected the following tools to perform the end to end data replication:

    We chose MongoDB Stitch for picking up the changes in the source database. It is the serverless platform from MongoDB. One of the services offered by MongoDB Stitch is Stitch Triggers. Using stitch triggers, you can execute a serverless function (in Node.js) in real time in response to changes in the database. When there are a lot of database changes, Stitch automatically "feeds forward" these changes through an asynchronous queue.

    We chose Amazon SQS as the pipe / message backbone for communicating the changes from MongoDB to our own replication service. Interestingly enough, MongoDB stitch offers integration with AWS services.

    In the Node.js function, we wrote minimal functionality to communicate the database changes (insert / update / delete / replace) to Amazon SQS.

    Next we wrote a minimal micro-service in Python to listen to the message events on SQS, pickup the data payload & mirror the DB changes on to the target Data warehouse. We implemented source data to target data translation by modelling target table structures through SQLAlchemy . We deployed this micro-service as AWS Lambda with Zappa. With Zappa, deploying your services as event-driven & horizontally scalable Lambda service is dumb-easy.

    In the end, we got to implement a highly scalable near realtime Change Data Replication service that "works" and deployed to production in a matter of few days!

    See more
    Robert Zuber
    Robert Zuber
    CTO at CircleCI · | 22 upvotes · 143.6K views
    atCircleCICircleCI
    Amazon S3
    Amazon S3
    GitHub
    GitHub
    Redis
    Redis
    PostgreSQL
    PostgreSQL
    MongoDB
    MongoDB

    We use MongoDB as our primary #datastore. Mongo's approach to replica sets enables some fantastic patterns for operations like maintenance, backups, and #ETL.

    As we pull #microservices from our #monolith, we are taking the opportunity to build them with their own datastores using PostgreSQL. We also use Redis to cache data we’d never store permanently, and to rate-limit our requests to partners’ APIs (like GitHub).

    When we’re dealing with large blobs of immutable data (logs, artifacts, and test results), we store them in Amazon S3. We handle any side-effects of S3’s eventual consistency model within our own code. This ensures that we deal with user requests correctly while writes are in process.

    See more
    IPFS  logo

    IPFS

    17
    11
    0
    17
    11
    + 1
    0
    Protocol for storing and sharing hypermedia in a distributed file system
      Be the first to leave a pro
      IPFS  logo
      IPFS
      VS
      BigchainDB logo
      BigchainDB
      MySQL logo

      MySQL

      23.2K
      17.8K
      3.7K
      23.2K
      17.8K
      + 1
      3.7K
      The world's most popular open source database
      MySQL logo
      MySQL
      VS
      BigchainDB logo
      BigchainDB

      related MySQL posts

      Tim Abbott
      Tim Abbott
      Founder at Zulip · | 19 upvotes · 85.1K views
      atZulipZulip
      Elasticsearch
      Elasticsearch
      MySQL
      MySQL
      PostgreSQL
      PostgreSQL

      We've been using PostgreSQL since the very early days of Zulip, but we actually didn't use it from the beginning. Zulip started out as a MySQL project back in 2012, because we'd heard it was a good choice for a startup with a wide community. However, we found that even though we were using the Django ORM for most of our database access, we spent a lot of time fighting with MySQL. Issues ranged from bad collation defaults, to bad query plans which required a lot of manual query tweaks.

      We ended up getting so frustrated that we tried out PostgresQL, and the results were fantastic. We didn't have to do any real customization (just some tuning settings for how big a server we had), and all of our most important queries were faster out of the box. As a result, we were able to delete a bunch of custom queries escaping the ORM that we'd written to make the MySQL query planner happy (because postgres just did the right thing automatically).

      And then after that, we've just gotten a ton of value out of postgres. We use its excellent built-in full-text search, which has helped us avoid needing to bring in a tool like Elasticsearch, and we've really enjoyed features like its partial indexes, which saved us a lot of work adding unnecessary extra tables to get good performance for things like our "unread messages" and "starred messages" indexes.

      I can't recommend it highly enough.

      See more
      Julien DeFrance
      Julien DeFrance
      Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 16 upvotes · 366.1K views
      atSmartZipSmartZip
      Amazon DynamoDB
      Amazon DynamoDB
      Ruby
      Ruby
      Node.js
      Node.js
      AWS Lambda
      AWS Lambda
      New Relic
      New Relic
      Amazon Elasticsearch Service
      Amazon Elasticsearch Service
      Elasticsearch
      Elasticsearch
      Superset
      Superset
      Amazon Quicksight
      Amazon Quicksight
      Amazon Redshift
      Amazon Redshift
      Zapier
      Zapier
      Segment
      Segment
      Amazon CloudFront
      Amazon CloudFront
      Memcached
      Memcached
      Amazon ElastiCache
      Amazon ElastiCache
      Amazon RDS for Aurora
      Amazon RDS for Aurora
      MySQL
      MySQL
      Amazon RDS
      Amazon RDS
      Amazon S3
      Amazon S3
      Docker
      Docker
      Capistrano
      Capistrano
      AWS Elastic Beanstalk
      AWS Elastic Beanstalk
      Rails API
      Rails API
      Rails
      Rails
      Algolia
      Algolia

      Back in 2014, I was given an opportunity to re-architect SmartZip Analytics platform, and flagship product: SmartTargeting. This is a SaaS software helping real estate professionals keeping up with their prospects and leads in a given neighborhood/territory, finding out (thanks to predictive analytics) who's the most likely to list/sell their home, and running cross-channel marketing automation against them: direct mail, online ads, email... The company also does provide Data APIs to Enterprise customers.

      I had inherited years and years of technical debt and I knew things had to change radically. The first enabler to this was to make use of the cloud and go with AWS, so we would stop re-inventing the wheel, and build around managed/scalable services.

      For the SaaS product, we kept on working with Rails as this was what my team had the most knowledge in. We've however broken up the monolith and decoupled the front-end application from the backend thanks to the use of Rails API so we'd get independently scalable micro-services from now on.

      Our various applications could now be deployed using AWS Elastic Beanstalk so we wouldn't waste any more efforts writing time-consuming Capistrano deployment scripts for instance. Combined with Docker so our application would run within its own container, independently from the underlying host configuration.

      Storage-wise, we went with Amazon S3 and ditched any pre-existing local or network storage people used to deal with in our legacy systems. On the database side: Amazon RDS / MySQL initially. Ultimately migrated to Amazon RDS for Aurora / MySQL when it got released. Once again, here you need a managed service your cloud provider handles for you.

      Future improvements / technology decisions included:

      Caching: Amazon ElastiCache / Memcached CDN: Amazon CloudFront Systems Integration: Segment / Zapier Data-warehousing: Amazon Redshift BI: Amazon Quicksight / Superset Search: Elasticsearch / Amazon Elasticsearch Service / Algolia Monitoring: New Relic

      As our usage grows, patterns changed, and/or our business needs evolved, my role as Engineering Manager then Director of Engineering was also to ensure my team kept on learning and innovating, while delivering on business value.

      One of these innovations was to get ourselves into Serverless : Adopting AWS Lambda was a big step forward. At the time, only available for Node.js (Not Ruby ) but a great way to handle cost efficiency, unpredictable traffic, sudden bursts of traffic... Ultimately you want the whole chain of services involved in a call to be serverless, and that's when we've started leveraging Amazon DynamoDB on these projects so they'd be fully scalable.

      See more
      PostgreSQL logo

      PostgreSQL

      16.9K
      12.7K
      3.4K
      16.9K
      12.7K
      + 1
      3.4K
      A powerful, open source object-relational database system
      PostgreSQL logo
      PostgreSQL
      VS
      BigchainDB logo
      BigchainDB

      related PostgreSQL posts

      Jeyabalaji Subramanian
      Jeyabalaji Subramanian
      CTO at FundsCorner · | 24 upvotes · 263K views
      atFundsCornerFundsCorner
      Zappa
      Zappa
      AWS Lambda
      AWS Lambda
      SQLAlchemy
      SQLAlchemy
      Python
      Python
      Amazon SQS
      Amazon SQS
      Node.js
      Node.js
      MongoDB Stitch
      MongoDB Stitch
      PostgreSQL
      PostgreSQL
      MongoDB
      MongoDB

      Recently we were looking at a few robust and cost-effective ways of replicating the data that resides in our production MongoDB to a PostgreSQL database for data warehousing and business intelligence.

      We set ourselves the following criteria for the optimal tool that would do this job: - The data replication must be near real-time, yet it should NOT impact the production database - The data replication must be horizontally scalable (based on the load), asynchronous & crash-resilient

      Based on the above criteria, we selected the following tools to perform the end to end data replication:

      We chose MongoDB Stitch for picking up the changes in the source database. It is the serverless platform from MongoDB. One of the services offered by MongoDB Stitch is Stitch Triggers. Using stitch triggers, you can execute a serverless function (in Node.js) in real time in response to changes in the database. When there are a lot of database changes, Stitch automatically "feeds forward" these changes through an asynchronous queue.

      We chose Amazon SQS as the pipe / message backbone for communicating the changes from MongoDB to our own replication service. Interestingly enough, MongoDB stitch offers integration with AWS services.

      In the Node.js function, we wrote minimal functionality to communicate the database changes (insert / update / delete / replace) to Amazon SQS.

      Next we wrote a minimal micro-service in Python to listen to the message events on SQS, pickup the data payload & mirror the DB changes on to the target Data warehouse. We implemented source data to target data translation by modelling target table structures through SQLAlchemy . We deployed this micro-service as AWS Lambda with Zappa. With Zappa, deploying your services as event-driven & horizontally scalable Lambda service is dumb-easy.

      In the end, we got to implement a highly scalable near realtime Change Data Replication service that "works" and deployed to production in a matter of few days!

      See more
      Robert Zuber
      Robert Zuber
      CTO at CircleCI · | 22 upvotes · 143.6K views
      atCircleCICircleCI
      Amazon S3
      Amazon S3
      GitHub
      GitHub
      Redis
      Redis
      PostgreSQL
      PostgreSQL
      MongoDB
      MongoDB

      We use MongoDB as our primary #datastore. Mongo's approach to replica sets enables some fantastic patterns for operations like maintenance, backups, and #ETL.

      As we pull #microservices from our #monolith, we are taking the opportunity to build them with their own datastores using PostgreSQL. We also use Redis to cache data we’d never store permanently, and to rate-limit our requests to partners’ APIs (like GitHub).

      When we’re dealing with large blobs of immutable data (logs, artifacts, and test results), we store them in Amazon S3. We handle any side-effects of S3’s eventual consistency model within our own code. This ensures that we deal with user requests correctly while writes are in process.

      See more

      related Microsoft SQL Server posts

      Amazon ElastiCache
      Amazon ElastiCache
      Amazon Elasticsearch Service
      Amazon Elasticsearch Service
      AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)
      AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)
      Memcached
      Memcached
      Redis
      Redis
      Python
      Python
      AWS Lambda
      AWS Lambda
      Amazon RDS
      Amazon RDS
      Microsoft SQL Server
      Microsoft SQL Server
      MariaDB
      MariaDB
      Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
      Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
      Rails
      Rails
      Ruby
      Ruby
      Heroku
      Heroku
      AWS Elastic Beanstalk
      AWS Elastic Beanstalk

      We initially started out with Heroku as our PaaS provider due to a desire to use it by our original developer for our Ruby on Rails application/website at the time. We were finding response times slow, it was painfully slow, sometimes taking 10 seconds to start loading the main page. Moving up to the next "compute" level was going to be very expensive.

      We moved our site over to AWS Elastic Beanstalk , not only did response times on the site practically become instant, our cloud bill for the application was cut in half.

      In database world we are currently using Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL also, we have both MariaDB and Microsoft SQL Server both hosted on Amazon RDS. The plan is to migrate to AWS Aurora Serverless for all 3 of those database systems.

      Additional services we use for our public applications: AWS Lambda, Python, Redis, Memcached, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Amazon Elasticsearch Service, Amazon ElastiCache

      See more

      related MariaDB posts

      Amazon ElastiCache
      Amazon ElastiCache
      Amazon Elasticsearch Service
      Amazon Elasticsearch Service
      AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)
      AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)
      Memcached
      Memcached
      Redis
      Redis
      Python
      Python
      AWS Lambda
      AWS Lambda
      Amazon RDS
      Amazon RDS
      Microsoft SQL Server
      Microsoft SQL Server
      MariaDB
      MariaDB
      Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
      Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
      Rails
      Rails
      Ruby
      Ruby
      Heroku
      Heroku
      AWS Elastic Beanstalk
      AWS Elastic Beanstalk

      We initially started out with Heroku as our PaaS provider due to a desire to use it by our original developer for our Ruby on Rails application/website at the time. We were finding response times slow, it was painfully slow, sometimes taking 10 seconds to start loading the main page. Moving up to the next "compute" level was going to be very expensive.

      We moved our site over to AWS Elastic Beanstalk , not only did response times on the site practically become instant, our cloud bill for the application was cut in half.

      In database world we are currently using Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL also, we have both MariaDB and Microsoft SQL Server both hosted on Amazon RDS. The plan is to migrate to AWS Aurora Serverless for all 3 of those database systems.

      Additional services we use for our public applications: AWS Lambda, Python, Redis, Memcached, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Amazon Elasticsearch Service, Amazon ElastiCache

      See more
      Joshua Dean Küpper
      Joshua Dean Küpper
      CEO at Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt) · | 5 upvotes · 35.4K views
      atScrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt)Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
      Sentry
      Sentry
      GitLab
      GitLab
      PostgreSQL
      PostgreSQL
      MariaDB
      MariaDB

      We primarily use MariaDB but use PostgreSQL as a part of GitLab , Sentry and @Nextcloud , which (initially) forced us to use it anyways. While this isn't much of a decision – because we didn't have one (ha ha) – we learned to love the perks and advantages of PostgreSQL anyways. PostgreSQLs extension system makes it even more flexible than a lot of the other SQL-based DBs (that only offer stored procedures) and the additional JOIN options, the enhanced role management and the different authentication options came in really handy, when doing manual maintenance on the databases.

      See more
      SQLite logo

      SQLite

      3.3K
      2.6K
      504
      3.3K
      2.6K
      + 1
      504
      A software library that implements a self-contained, serverless, zero-configuration, transactional SQL database engine
      SQLite logo
      SQLite
      VS
      BigchainDB logo
      BigchainDB

      related SQLite posts

      Daniel Quinn
      Daniel Quinn
      Senior Developer at Founders4Schools · | 2 upvotes · 20.7K views
      atThe Paperless ProjectThe Paperless Project
      PostgreSQL
      PostgreSQL
      SQLite
      SQLite

      SQLite is a tricky beast. It's great if you're working single-threaded, but a Terrible Idea if you've got more than one concurrent connection. You use it because it's easy to setup, light, and portable (it's just a file).

      In Paperless, we've built a self-hosted web application, so it makes sense to standardise on something small & light, and as we don't have to worry about multiple connections (it's just you using the app), it's a perfect fit.

      For users wanting to scale Paperless up to a multi-user environment though, we do provide the hooks to switch to PostgreSQL .

      See more
      PostgreSQL
      PostgreSQL
      SQLite
      SQLite

      SQLite for development, PostgreSQL SQL for production databases.

      See more
      Memcached logo

      Memcached

      2.7K
      1.6K
      452
      2.7K
      1.6K
      + 1
      452
      High-performance, distributed memory object caching system
      Memcached logo
      Memcached
      VS
      BigchainDB logo
      BigchainDB

      related Memcached posts

      Julien DeFrance
      Julien DeFrance
      Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 16 upvotes · 366.1K views
      atSmartZipSmartZip
      Amazon DynamoDB
      Amazon DynamoDB
      Ruby
      Ruby
      Node.js
      Node.js
      AWS Lambda
      AWS Lambda
      New Relic
      New Relic
      Amazon Elasticsearch Service
      Amazon Elasticsearch Service
      Elasticsearch
      Elasticsearch
      Superset
      Superset
      Amazon Quicksight
      Amazon Quicksight
      Amazon Redshift
      Amazon Redshift
      Zapier
      Zapier
      Segment
      Segment
      Amazon CloudFront
      Amazon CloudFront
      Memcached
      Memcached
      Amazon ElastiCache
      Amazon ElastiCache
      Amazon RDS for Aurora
      Amazon RDS for Aurora
      MySQL
      MySQL
      Amazon RDS
      Amazon RDS
      Amazon S3
      Amazon S3
      Docker
      Docker
      Capistrano
      Capistrano
      AWS Elastic Beanstalk
      AWS Elastic Beanstalk
      Rails API
      Rails API
      Rails
      Rails
      Algolia
      Algolia

      Back in 2014, I was given an opportunity to re-architect SmartZip Analytics platform, and flagship product: SmartTargeting. This is a SaaS software helping real estate professionals keeping up with their prospects and leads in a given neighborhood/territory, finding out (thanks to predictive analytics) who's the most likely to list/sell their home, and running cross-channel marketing automation against them: direct mail, online ads, email... The company also does provide Data APIs to Enterprise customers.

      I had inherited years and years of technical debt and I knew things had to change radically. The first enabler to this was to make use of the cloud and go with AWS, so we would stop re-inventing the wheel, and build around managed/scalable services.

      For the SaaS product, we kept on working with Rails as this was what my team had the most knowledge in. We've however broken up the monolith and decoupled the front-end application from the backend thanks to the use of Rails API so we'd get independently scalable micro-services from now on.

      Our various applications could now be deployed using AWS Elastic Beanstalk so we wouldn't waste any more efforts writing time-consuming Capistrano deployment scripts for instance. Combined with Docker so our application would run within its own container, independently from the underlying host configuration.

      Storage-wise, we went with Amazon S3 and ditched any pre-existing local or network storage people used to deal with in our legacy systems. On the database side: Amazon RDS / MySQL initially. Ultimately migrated to Amazon RDS for Aurora / MySQL when it got released. Once again, here you need a managed service your cloud provider handles for you.

      Future improvements / technology decisions included:

      Caching: Amazon ElastiCache / Memcached CDN: Amazon CloudFront Systems Integration: Segment / Zapier Data-warehousing: Amazon Redshift BI: Amazon Quicksight / Superset Search: Elasticsearch / Amazon Elasticsearch Service / Algolia Monitoring: New Relic

      As our usage grows, patterns changed, and/or our business needs evolved, my role as Engineering Manager then Director of Engineering was also to ensure my team kept on learning and innovating, while delivering on business value.

      One of these innovations was to get ourselves into Serverless : Adopting AWS Lambda was a big step forward. At the time, only available for Node.js (Not Ruby ) but a great way to handle cost efficiency, unpredictable traffic, sudden bursts of traffic... Ultimately you want the whole chain of services involved in a call to be serverless, and that's when we've started leveraging Amazon DynamoDB on these projects so they'd be fully scalable.

      See more
      Kir Shatrov
      Kir Shatrov
      Production Engineer at Shopify · | 13 upvotes · 105K views
      atShopifyShopify
      Memcached
      Memcached
      Redis
      Redis
      MySQL
      MySQL
      Google Kubernetes Engine
      Google Kubernetes Engine
      Kubernetes
      Kubernetes
      Docker
      Docker

      At Shopify, over the years, we moved from shards to the concept of "pods". A pod is a fully isolated instance of Shopify with its own datastores like MySQL, Redis, Memcached. A pod can be spawned in any region. This approach has helped us eliminate global outages. As of today, we have more than a hundred pods, and since moving to this architecture we haven't had any major outages that affected all of Shopify. An outage today only affects a single pod or region.

      As we grew into hundreds of shards and pods, it became clear that we needed a solution to orchestrate those deployments. Today, we use Docker, Kubernetes, and Google Kubernetes Engine to make it easy to bootstrap resources for new Shopify Pods.

      See more
      Cassandra logo

      Cassandra

      2K
      1.6K
      442
      2K
      1.6K
      + 1
      442
      A partitioned row store. Rows are organized into tables with a required primary key.
      Cassandra logo
      Cassandra
      VS
      BigchainDB logo
      BigchainDB

      related Cassandra posts

      Thierry Schellenbach
      Thierry Schellenbach
      CEO at Stream · | 17 upvotes · 46.9K views
      atStreamStream
      RocksDB
      RocksDB
      Cassandra
      Cassandra
      Redis
      Redis
      #Databases
      #DataStores
      #InMemoryDatabases

      1.0 of Stream leveraged Cassandra for storing the feed. Cassandra is a common choice for building feeds. Instagram, for instance started, out with Redis but eventually switched to Cassandra to handle their rapid usage growth. Cassandra can handle write heavy workloads very efficiently.

      Cassandra is a great tool that allows you to scale write capacity simply by adding more nodes, though it is also very complex. This complexity made it hard to diagnose performance fluctuations. Even though we had years of experience with running Cassandra, it still felt like a bit of a black box. When building Stream 2.0 we decided to go for a different approach and build Keevo. Keevo is our in-house key-value store built upon RocksDB, gRPC and Raft.

      RocksDB is a highly performant embeddable database library developed and maintained by Facebook’s data engineering team. RocksDB started as a fork of Google’s LevelDB that introduced several performance improvements for SSD. Nowadays RocksDB is a project on its own and is under active development. It is written in C++ and it’s fast. Have a look at how this benchmark handles 7 million QPS. In terms of technology it’s much more simple than Cassandra.

      This translates into reduced maintenance overhead, improved performance and, most importantly, more consistent performance. It’s interesting to note that LinkedIn also uses RocksDB for their feed.

      #InMemoryDatabases #DataStores #Databases

      See more
      Linux
      Linux
      Docker
      Docker
      jQuery
      jQuery
      AngularJS
      AngularJS
      React
      React
      Cassandra
      Cassandra
      MongoDB
      MongoDB
      MySQL
      MySQL
      Zend Framework
      Zend Framework
      Laravel
      Laravel

      React AngularJS jQuery

      Laravel Zend Framework

      MySQL MongoDB Cassandra

      Docker

      Linux

      See more
      Hadoop logo

      Hadoop

      1.1K
      880
      48
      1.1K
      880
      + 1
      48
      Open-source software for reliable, scalable, distributed computing
      Hadoop logo
      Hadoop
      VS
      BigchainDB logo
      BigchainDB

      related Hadoop posts

      StackShare Editors
      StackShare Editors
      | 4 upvotes · 84.1K views
      atUber TechnologiesUber Technologies
      Hadoop
      Hadoop
      Logstash
      Logstash
      Elasticsearch
      Elasticsearch
      Kibana
      Kibana
      Kafka
      Kafka

      With interactions across each other and mobile devices, logging is important as it is information for internal cases like debugging and business cases like dynamic pricing.

      With multiple Kafka clusters, data is archived into Hadoop before expiration. Data is ingested in realtime and indexed into an ELK stack. The ELK stack comprises of Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana for searching and visualization.

      See more
      StackShare Editors
      StackShare Editors
      Apache Thrift
      Apache Thrift
      Kotlin
      Kotlin
      Presto
      Presto
      HHVM (HipHop Virtual Machine)
      HHVM (HipHop Virtual Machine)
      gRPC
      gRPC
      Kubernetes
      Kubernetes
      Apache Spark
      Apache Spark
      Airflow
      Airflow
      Terraform
      Terraform
      Hadoop
      Hadoop
      Swift
      Swift
      Hack
      Hack
      Memcached
      Memcached
      Consul
      Consul
      Chef
      Chef
      Prometheus
      Prometheus

      Since the beginning, Cal Henderson has been the CTO of Slack. Earlier this year, he commented on a Quora question summarizing their current stack.

      Apps
      • Web: a mix of JavaScript/ES6 and React.
      • Desktop: And Electron to ship it as a desktop application.
      • Android: a mix of Java and Kotlin.
      • iOS: written in a mix of Objective C and Swift.
      Backend
      • The core application and the API written in PHP/Hack that runs on HHVM.
      • The data is stored in MySQL using Vitess.
      • Caching is done using Memcached and MCRouter.
      • The search service takes help from SolrCloud, with various Java services.
      • The messaging system uses WebSockets with many services in Java and Go.
      • Load balancing is done using HAproxy with Consul for configuration.
      • Most services talk to each other over gRPC,
      • Some Thrift and JSON-over-HTTP
      • Voice and video calling service was built in Elixir.
      Data warehouse
      • Built using open source tools including Presto, Spark, Airflow, Hadoop and Kafka.
      Etc
      See more
      Oracle logo

      Oracle

      819
      595
      79
      819
      595
      + 1
      79
      An RDBMS that implements object-oriented features such as user-defined types, inheritance, and polymorphism
      Oracle logo
      Oracle
      VS
      BigchainDB logo
      BigchainDB
      CouchDB logo

      CouchDB

      287
      245
      136
      287
      245
      + 1
      136
      HTTP + JSON document database with Map Reduce views and peer-based replication
      CouchDB logo
      CouchDB
      VS
      BigchainDB logo
      BigchainDB

      related CouchDB posts

      Jonathan Pugh
      Jonathan Pugh
      Software Engineer / Project Manager / Technical Architect · | 18 upvotes · 175.5K views
      Pouchdb
      Pouchdb
      CouchDB
      CouchDB
      Font Awesome
      Font Awesome
      CSS 3
      CSS 3
      Apache Cordova
      Apache Cordova
      PhoneGap
      PhoneGap
      HTML5
      HTML5
      Ruby
      Ruby
      Babel
      Babel
      Webpack
      Webpack
      Visual Studio Code
      Visual Studio Code
      Figma
      Figma
      TypeScript
      TypeScript
      JavaScript
      JavaScript
      Framework7
      Framework7
      #Css
      #CSS3
      #SCSS
      #Sass
      #Less
      #Electron
      #HandleBars
      #Template7
      #Sketch
      #GraphQL
      #HTML5
      #GraphCool

      I needed to choose a full stack of tools for cross platform mobile application design & development. After much research and trying different tools, these are what I came up with that work for me today:

      For the client coding I chose Framework7 because of its performance, easy learning curve, and very well designed, beautiful UI widgets. I think it's perfect for solo development or small teams. I didn't like React Native. It felt heavy to me and rigid. Framework7 allows the use of #CSS3, which I think is the best technology to come out of the #WWW movement. No other tech has been able to allow designers and developers to develop such flexible, high performance, customisable user interface elements that are highly responsive and hardware accelerated before. Now #CSS3 includes variables and flexboxes it is truly a powerful language and there is no longer a need for preprocessors such as #SCSS / #Sass / #less. React Native contains a very limited interpretation of #CSS3 which I found very frustrating after using #CSS3 for some years already and knowing its powerful features. The other very nice feature of Framework7 is that you can even build for the browser if you want your app to be available for desktop web browsers. The latest release also includes the ability to build for #Electron so you can have MacOS, Windows and Linux desktop apps. This is not possible with React Native yet.

      Framework7 runs on top of Apache Cordova. Cordova and webviews have been slated as being slow in the past. Having a game developer background I found the tweeks to make it run as smooth as silk. One of those tweeks is to use WKWebView. Another important one was using srcset on images.

      I use #Template7 for the for the templating system which is a no-nonsense mobile-centric #HandleBars style extensible templating system. It's easy to write custom helpers for, is fast and has a small footprint. I'm not forced into a new paradigm or learning some new syntax. It operates with standard JavaScript, HTML5 and CSS 3. It's written by the developer of Framework7 and so dovetails with it as expected.

      I configured TypeScript to work with the latest version of Framework7. I consider TypeScript to be one of the best creations to come out of Microsoft in some time. They must have an amazing team working on it. It's very powerful and flexible. It helps you catch a lot of bugs and also provides code completion in supporting IDEs. So for my IDE I use Visual Studio Code which is a blazingly fast and silky smooth editor that integrates seamlessly with TypeScript for the ultimate type checking setup (both products are produced by Microsoft).

      I use Webpack and Babel to compile the JavaScript. TypeScript can compile to JavaScript directly but Babel offers a few more options and polyfills so you can use the latest (and even prerelease) JavaScript features today and compile to be backwards compatible with virtually any browser. My favorite recent addition is "optional chaining" which greatly simplifies and increases readability of a number of sections of my code dealing with getting and setting data in nested objects.

      I use some Ruby scripts to process images with ImageMagick and pngquant to optimise for size and even auto insert responsive image code into the HTML5. Ruby is the ultimate cross platform scripting language. Even as your scripts become large, Ruby allows you to refactor your code easily and make it Object Oriented if necessary. I find it the quickest and easiest way to maintain certain aspects of my build process.

      For the user interface design and prototyping I use Figma. Figma has an almost identical user interface to #Sketch but has the added advantage of being cross platform (MacOS and Windows). Its real-time collaboration features are outstanding and I use them a often as I work mostly on remote projects. Clients can collaborate in real-time and see changes I make as I make them. The clickable prototyping features in Figma are also very well designed and mean I can send clickable prototypes to clients to try user interface updates as they are made and get immediate feedback. I'm currently also evaluating the latest version of #AdobeXD as an alternative to Figma as it has the very cool auto-animate feature. It doesn't have real-time collaboration yet, but I heard it is proposed for 2019.

      For the UI icons I use Font Awesome Pro. They have the largest selection and best looking icons you can find on the internet with several variations in styles so you can find most of the icons you want for standard projects.

      For the backend I was using the #GraphCool Framework. As I later found out, #GraphQL still has some way to go in order to provide the full power of a mature graph query language so later in my project I ripped out #GraphCool and replaced it with CouchDB and Pouchdb. Primarily so I could provide good offline app support. CouchDB with Pouchdb is very flexible and efficient combination and overcomes some of the restrictions I found in #GraphQL and hence #GraphCool also. The most impressive and important feature of CouchDB is its replication. You can configure it in various ways for backups, fault tolerance, caching or conditional merging of databases. CouchDB and Pouchdb even supports storing, retrieving and serving binary or image data or other mime types. This removes a level of complexity usually present in database implementations where binary or image data is usually referenced through an #HTML5 link. With CouchDB and Pouchdb apps can operate offline and sync later, very efficiently, when the network connection is good.

      I use PhoneGap when testing the app. It auto-reloads your app when its code is changed and you can also install it on Android phones to preview your app instantly. iOS is a bit more tricky cause of Apple's policies so it's not available on the App Store, but you can build it and install it yourself to your device.

      So that's my latest mobile stack. What tools do you use? Have you tried these ones?

      See more
      Josh Dzielak
      Josh Dzielak
      Developer Advocate at DeveloperMode · | 5 upvotes · 23.8K views
      Cloudant
      Cloudant
      CouchDB
      CouchDB
      Pouchdb
      Pouchdb
      Firebase
      Firebase

      As a side project, I was building a note taking app that needed to synchronize between the client and the server so that it would work offline. At first I used Firebase to store the data on the server and wrote my own code to cache Firebase data in local storage and synchronize it. This was brittle and not performant. I figured that someone else must have solved this in a better way so I went looking for a better solution.

      I needed a tool where I could write the data once and it would write to client and server, and when clients came back on line they would automatically catch the client up. I also needed conflict resolution. I was thrilled to discover Pouchdb and its server-side counterpart CouchDB. Together, they met nearly all of my requirements and were very easy to implement - I was able to remove a ton of custom code and have found the synchronization to be very robust. Pouchdb 7 has improved mobile support too, so I can run the app on iOS or Android browsers.

      My Couchdb instance is actually a Cloudant instance running on IBM Bluemix. For my fairly low level of API usage, it's been totally free, and it has a decent GUI for managing users and replications.

      See more

      related RethinkDB posts

      Łukasz Korecki
      Łukasz Korecki
      CTO & Co-founder at EnjoyHQ · | 12 upvotes · 37.5K views
      atEnjoyHQEnjoyHQ
      PostgreSQL
      PostgreSQL
      MongoDB
      MongoDB
      RethinkDB
      RethinkDB

      We initially chose RethinkDB because of the schema-less document store features, and better durability resilience/story than MongoDB In the end, it didn't work out quite as we expected: there's plenty of scalability issues, it's near impossible to run analytical workloads and small community makes working with Rethink a challenge. We're in process of migrating all our workloads to PostgreSQL and hopefully, we will be able to decommission our RethinkDB deployment soon.

      See more