What is Duo Security and what are its top alternatives?
Top Alternatives to Duo Security
We make the best rated Two-Factor Authentication smartphone app for consumers, a Rest API for developers and a strong authentication platform for the enterprise. ...
Connect all your apps in days, not months, with instant access to thousands of pre-built integrations - even add apps to the network yourself. Integrations are easy to set up, constantly monitored, proactively repaired and handle authentication and provisioning. ...
It provides an identity and access management platform enabling the right people access to the right things seamlessly and securely. ...
It is a robust, commercial-grade, and full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols. It is also a general-purpose cryptography library. ...
It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG). ...
Ensighten is a comprehensive website security company, offering next generation compliance, enforcement and client-side protection against data loss, ad injection and intrusion. ...
Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved. ...
AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect your web applications from common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources. ...
Duo Security alternatives & related posts
- Google Authenticator-compatible1
- Terrible UI on mobile2
related Authy posts
- REST API12
- Easy LDAP integration5
- User Provisioning5
- OIDC OpenID Connect5
- Universal Directory4
- API Access Management - oAuth2 as a service4
- Protect B2E, B2B, B2C apps4
- SSO, MFA for cloud, on-prem, custom apps3
- Easy Active Directory integration3
- Tons of Identity Management features3
- SWA applications Integration1
- Pricing is too high2
- Okta verify (Multi-factor Authentication)1
related Okta posts
Hey all, We're currently weighing up the pros & cons of using Firebase Authentication vs something more OTB like Auth0 or Okta to manage end-user access management for a consumer digital content product. From what I understand so far, Something like Firebase Auth would require more dev effort but is likely to cost less overall, whereas OTB, you have a UI-based console which makes config by non-technical business users easier to manage. Does anyone else have any intuitions or experiences they could share on this, please? Thank you!
- Third Party IdP2
- On-prem integrations2
- OAUTH 2.02
- Social Provider2
- REST API1
- Mobile SDK1
- Access Management1
- User Provisioning1
related Ping Identity posts
related OpenSSL posts
Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:
- GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
- Respectively Git as revision control system
- SourceTree as Git GUI
- Visual Studio Code as IDE
- CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
- Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
- SonarQube as quality gate
- Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
- VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
- Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
- Heroku for deploying in test environments
- nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
- SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
- Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
- PostgreSQL as preferred database system
- Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)
The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:
- Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
- Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
- Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
- Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
- Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
- Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
- Open Source SSL46
- Simple setup30
- Easy ssl certificates0
related Let's Encrypt posts
related Ensighten posts
- Block attacks in real-time10
- Security monitoring9
- Integrates in minutes8
- Easily enforce security headers6
- Prevent data breaches5
- Get full visibility into app security5
- Monitor suspicious users5
- Unified security solution for web apps1