Alternatives to GoLand logo

Alternatives to GoLand

Java, Node.js, Python, Go, and Visual Studio Code are the most popular alternatives and competitors to GoLand.
307
184
+ 1
10

What is GoLand and what are its top alternatives?

Cross-platform IDE focused on Go development. It makes it very easy to read, write and change the code. Out of the box support it supports technologies and databases such as Javascript, TypeScript, React, PostgresSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, etc.
GoLand is a tool in the Integrated Development Environment category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to GoLand

  • Java

    Java

    Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere! ...

  • Node.js

    Node.js

    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices. ...

  • Python

    Python

    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best. ...

  • Go

    Go

    Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language. ...

  • Visual Studio Code

    Visual Studio Code

    Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows. ...

  • IntelliJ IDEA

    IntelliJ IDEA

    Out of the box, IntelliJ IDEA provides a comprehensive feature set including tools and integrations with the most important modern technologies and frameworks for enterprise and web development with Java, Scala, Groovy and other languages. ...

  • WebStorm

    WebStorm

    WebStorm is a lightweight and intelligent IDE for front-end development and server-side JavaScript. ...

  • Visual Studio

    Visual Studio

    Visual Studio is a suite of component-based software development tools and other technologies for building powerful, high-performance applications. ...

GoLand alternatives & related posts

Java logo

Java

80.8K
59.4K
3.5K
A concurrent, class-based, object-oriented, language specifically designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible
80.8K
59.4K
+ 1
3.5K
PROS OF JAVA
  • 576
    Great libraries
  • 436
    Widely used
  • 396
    Excellent tooling
  • 380
    Huge amount of documentation available
  • 329
    Large pool of developers available
  • 198
    Open source
  • 194
    Excellent performance
  • 150
    Great development
  • 144
    Used for android
  • 143
    Vast array of 3rd party libraries
  • 54
    Compiled Language
  • 46
    Used for Web
  • 43
    Managed memory
  • 42
    Native threads
  • 41
    High Performance
  • 36
    Statically typed
  • 32
    Easy to read
  • 30
    Great Community
  • 26
    Reliable platform
  • 23
    JVM compatibility
  • 23
    Sturdy garbage collection
  • 19
    Cross Platform Enterprise Integration
  • 18
    Universal platform
  • 16
    Good amount of APIs
  • 16
    Great Support
  • 11
    Lots of boilerplate
  • 10
    Backward compatible
  • 10
    Great ecosystem
  • 9
    Everywhere
  • 7
    Excellent SDK - JDK
  • 6
    Mature language thus stable systems
  • 5
    Cross-platform
  • 5
    Portability
  • 5
    Better than Ruby
  • 5
    Static typing
  • 5
    It's Java
  • 5
    Clojure
  • 4
    Vast Collections Library
  • 4
    Long term language
  • 4
    Old tech
  • 3
    Best martial for design
  • 3
    Great Structure
  • 3
    Most developers favorite
  • 3
    Stable platform, which many new languages depend on
  • 3
    Used for Android development
  • 2
    Testable
  • 1
    Javadoc
CONS OF JAVA
  • 29
    Verbosity
  • 24
    NullpointerException
  • 15
    Overcomplexity is praised in community culture
  • 14
    Nightmare to Write
  • 10
    Boiler plate code
  • 8
    Classpath hell prior to Java 9
  • 6
    No REPL
  • 4
    No property
  • 2
    Code are too long
  • 2
    There is not optional parameter
  • 2
    Floating-point errors
  • 1
    Terrbible compared to Python/Batch Perormence
  • 1
    Java's too statically, stronglly, and strictly typed
  • 1
    Non-intuitive generic implementation
  • 1
    Returning Wildcard Types

related Java posts

Conor Myhrvold
Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 38 upvotes · 3.7M views

How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

(GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

See more
Kamil Kowalski
Lead Architect at Fresha · | 27 upvotes · 934.2K views

When you think about test automation, it’s crucial to make it everyone’s responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.

See more
Node.js logo

Node.js

108.7K
88.4K
8.3K
A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications
108.7K
88.4K
+ 1
8.3K
PROS OF NODE.JS
  • 1.4K
    Npm
  • 1.3K
    Javascript
  • 1.1K
    Great libraries
  • 1K
    High-performance
  • 791
    Open source
  • 480
    Great for apis
  • 471
    Asynchronous
  • 417
    Great community
  • 387
    Great for realtime apps
  • 292
    Great for command line utilities
  • 78
    Node Modules
  • 76
    Websockets
  • 65
    Uber Simple
  • 53
    Allows us to reuse code in the frontend
  • 53
    Great modularity
  • 38
    Easy to start
  • 33
    Great for Data Streaming
  • 29
    Realtime
  • 25
    Awesome
  • 23
    Non blocking IO
  • 16
    Can be used as a proxy
  • 15
    High performance, open source, scalable
  • 14
    Non-blocking and modular
  • 13
    Easy and Fun
  • 12
    Same lang as AngularJS
  • 11
    Easy and powerful
  • 10
    Future of BackEnd
  • 9
    Fast
  • 8
    Scalability
  • 8
    Cross platform
  • 8
    Fullstack
  • 7
    Mean Stack
  • 7
    Simple
  • 5
    Easy concurrency
  • 5
    Great for webapps
  • 5
    React
  • 4
    Friendly
  • 4
    Easy to use and fast and goes well with JSONdb's
  • 4
    Typescript
  • 4
    Fast, simple code and async
  • 3
    Its amazingly fast and scalable
  • 3
    Scalable
  • 3
    Great speed
  • 3
    Fast development
  • 3
    Isomorphic coolness
  • 3
    Control everything
  • 2
    It's fast
  • 2
    Not Python
  • 2
    Blazing fast
  • 2
    One language, end-to-end
  • 2
    TypeScript Support
  • 2
    Easy to learn
  • 2
    Javascript2
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Less boilerplate code
  • 2
    Sooper easy for the Backend connectivity
  • 2
    Great community
  • 2
    Scales, fast, simple, great community, npm, express
  • 2
    Performant and fast prototyping
  • 1
    Easy
  • 1
    Lovely
  • 0
    Event Driven
CONS OF NODE.JS
  • 46
    Bound to a single CPU
  • 40
    New framework every day
  • 34
    Lots of terrible examples on the internet
  • 28
    Asynchronous programming is the worst
  • 22
    Callback
  • 16
    Javascript
  • 11
    Dependency based on GitHub
  • 10
    Dependency hell
  • 10
    Low computational power
  • 7
    Can block whole server easily
  • 6
    Very very Slow
  • 6
    Callback functions may not fire on expected sequence
  • 3
    Unneeded over complication
  • 3
    Unstable
  • 3
    Breaking updates
  • 1
    No standard approach

related Node.js posts

Nick Rockwell
SVP, Engineering at Fastly · | 42 upvotes · 1.5M views

When I joined NYT there was already broad dissatisfaction with the LAMP (Linux Apache HTTP Server MySQL PHP) Stack and the front end framework, in particular. So, I wasn't passing judgment on it. I mean, LAMP's fine, you can do good work in LAMP. It's a little dated at this point, but it's not ... I didn't want to rip it out for its own sake, but everyone else was like, "We don't like this, it's really inflexible." And I remember from being outside the company when that was called MIT FIVE when it had launched. And been observing it from the outside, and I was like, you guys took so long to do that and you did it so carefully, and yet you're not happy with your decisions. Why is that? That was more the impetus. If we're going to do this again, how are we going to do it in a way that we're gonna get a better result?

So we're moving quickly away from LAMP, I would say. So, right now, the new front end is React based and using Apollo. And we've been in a long, protracted, gradual rollout of the core experiences.

React is now talking to GraphQL as a primary API. There's a Node.js back end, to the front end, which is mainly for server-side rendering, as well.

Behind there, the main repository for the GraphQL server is a big table repository, that we call Bodega because it's a convenience store. And that reads off of a Kafka pipeline.

See more
Conor Myhrvold
Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 38 upvotes · 3.7M views

How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

(GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

See more
Python logo

Python

131K
105.2K
6.5K
A clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
131K
105.2K
+ 1
6.5K
PROS OF PYTHON
  • 1.1K
    Great libraries
  • 927
    Readable code
  • 817
    Beautiful code
  • 768
    Rapid development
  • 671
    Large community
  • 418
    Open source
  • 379
    Elegant
  • 268
    Great community
  • 261
    Object oriented
  • 209
    Dynamic typing
  • 70
    Great standard library
  • 52
    Very fast
  • 48
    Functional programming
  • 35
    Scientific computing
  • 33
    Easy to learn
  • 30
    Great documentation
  • 25
    Matlab alternative
  • 23
    Productivity
  • 22
    Easy to read
  • 19
    Simple is better than complex
  • 17
    It's the way I think
  • 17
    Imperative
  • 15
    Very programmer and non-programmer friendly
  • 14
    Powerful
  • 14
    Free
  • 13
    Fast and simple
  • 13
    Powerfull language
  • 12
    Scripting
  • 9
    Machine learning support
  • 9
    Explicit is better than implicit
  • 8
    Unlimited power
  • 8
    Ease of development
  • 7
    Import antigravity
  • 7
    Clear and easy and powerfull
  • 6
    It's lean and fun to code
  • 6
    Print "life is short, use python"
  • 5
    Flat is better than nested
  • 5
    Fast coding and good for competitions
  • 5
    There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious
  • 5
    Python has great libraries for data processing
  • 5
    High Documented language
  • 5
    I love snakes
  • 5
    Although practicality beats purity
  • 5
    Great for tooling
  • 4
    Readability counts
  • 3
    CG industry needs
  • 3
    Beautiful is better than ugly
  • 3
    Multiple Inheritence
  • 3
    Complex is better than complicated
  • 3
    Great for analytics
  • 3
    Socially engaged community
  • 3
    Rapid Prototyping
  • 3
    Lists, tuples, dictionaries
  • 3
    Plotting
  • 2
    Generators
  • 2
    Simple and easy to learn
  • 2
    Import this
  • 2
    No cruft
  • 2
    Easy to learn and use
  • 2
    List comprehensions
  • 2
    Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules
  • 2
    Now is better than never
  • 2
    If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad id
  • 2
    If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a g
  • 1
    Many types of collections
  • 1
    Better outcome
  • 1
    Batteries included
  • 1
    Ys
  • 1
    Good
  • 1
    Pip install everything
  • 1
    Easy to setup and run smooth
  • 1
    Because of Netflix
  • 1
    Flexible and easy
  • 1
    Web scraping
  • 1
    Should START with this but not STICK with This
  • 1
    Powerful language for AI
  • 1
    It is Very easy , simple and will you be love programmi
  • 1
    Only one way to do it
  • 1
    A-to-Z
  • 0
    Pro
  • 0
    Powerful
CONS OF PYTHON
  • 50
    Still divided between python 2 and python 3
  • 27
    Performance impact
  • 26
    Poor syntax for anonymous functions
  • 19
    Package management is a mess
  • 19
    GIL
  • 13
    Too imperative-oriented
  • 12
    Hard to understand
  • 11
    Dynamic typing
  • 9
    Very slow
  • 8
    Not everything is expression
  • 7
    Explicit self parameter in methods
  • 7
    Indentations matter a lot
  • 6
    Poor DSL capabilities
  • 6
    No anonymous functions
  • 6
    Requires C functions for dynamic modules
  • 5
    Threading
  • 5
    The "lisp style" whitespaces
  • 5
    Hard to obfuscate
  • 4
    Fake object-oriented programming
  • 4
    Incredibly slow
  • 4
    Lack of Syntax Sugar leads to "the pyramid of doom"
  • 4
    The benevolent-dictator-for-life quit
  • 3
    Official documentation is unclear.
  • 3
    Circular import
  • 3
    Not suitable for autocomplete
  • 1
    Training wheels (forced indentation)
  • 1
    Meta classes

related Python posts

Conor Myhrvold
Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 38 upvotes · 3.7M views

How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

(GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

See more
Nick Parsons
Director of Developer Marketing at Stream · | 35 upvotes · 1.3M views

Winds 2.0 is an open source Podcast/RSS reader developed by Stream with a core goal to enable a wide range of developers to contribute.

We chose JavaScript because nearly every developer knows or can, at the very least, read JavaScript. With ES6 and Node.js v10.x.x, it’s become a very capable language. Async/Await is powerful and easy to use (Async/Await vs Promises). Babel allows us to experiment with next-generation JavaScript (features that are not in the official JavaScript spec yet). Yarn allows us to consistently install packages quickly (and is filled with tons of new tricks)

We’re using JavaScript for everything – both front and backend. Most of our team is experienced with Go and Python, so Node was not an obvious choice for this app.

Sure... there will be haters who refuse to acknowledge that there is anything remotely positive about JavaScript (there are even rants on Hacker News about Node.js); however, without writing completely in JavaScript, we would not have seen the results we did.

#FrameworksFullStack #Languages

See more
Go logo

Go

12.1K
10.3K
3K
An open source programming language that makes it easy to build simple, reliable, and efficient software
12.1K
10.3K
+ 1
3K
PROS OF GO
  • 520
    High-performance
  • 379
    Simple, minimal syntax
  • 345
    Fun to write
  • 291
    Easy concurrency support via goroutines
  • 263
    Fast compilation times
  • 185
    Goroutines
  • 175
    Statically linked binaries that are simple to deploy
  • 145
    Simple compile build/run procedures
  • 129
    Backed by google
  • 127
    Great community
  • 47
    Garbage collection built-in
  • 40
    Built-in Testing
  • 37
    Excellent tools - gofmt, godoc etc
  • 34
    Elegant and concise like Python, fast like C
  • 29
    Awesome to Develop
  • 23
    Used for Docker
  • 22
    Flexible interface system
  • 21
    Great concurrency pattern
  • 20
    Deploy as executable
  • 17
    Open-source Integration
  • 14
    Fun to write and so many feature out of the box
  • 13
    Easy to read
  • 12
    Its Simple and Heavy duty
  • 11
    Powerful and simple
  • 11
    Go is God
  • 11
    Easy to deploy
  • 9
    Concurrency
  • 9
    Best language for concurrency
  • 9
    Safe GOTOs
  • 8
    Clean code, high performance
  • 8
    Easy setup
  • 8
    Rich standard library
  • 7
    High performance
  • 7
    Simplicity, Concurrency, Performance
  • 7
    Hassle free deployment
  • 6
    Single binary avoids library dependency issues
  • 6
    Used by Giants of the industry
  • 5
    Simple, powerful, and great performance
  • 5
    Cross compiling
  • 4
    Excellent tooling
  • 4
    Garbage Collection
  • 4
    Very sophisticated syntax
  • 4
    Gofmt
  • 4
    WYSIWYG
  • 3
    Kubernetes written on Go
  • 2
    Keep it simple and stupid
  • 2
    Widely used
  • 0
    No generics
  • 0
    Operator goto
CONS OF GO
  • 39
    You waste time in plumbing code catching errors
  • 23
    Verbose
  • 22
    Packages and their path dependencies are braindead
  • 15
    Dependency management when working on multiple projects
  • 14
    Google's documentations aren't beginer friendly
  • 10
    Automatic garbage collection overheads
  • 8
    Uncommon syntax
  • 6
    Type system is lacking (no generics, etc)
  • 2
    Collection framework is lacking (list, set, map)

related Go posts

Conor Myhrvold
Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 38 upvotes · 3.7M views

How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

(GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

See more
Nick Parsons
Director of Developer Marketing at Stream · | 35 upvotes · 1.3M views

Winds 2.0 is an open source Podcast/RSS reader developed by Stream with a core goal to enable a wide range of developers to contribute.

We chose JavaScript because nearly every developer knows or can, at the very least, read JavaScript. With ES6 and Node.js v10.x.x, it’s become a very capable language. Async/Await is powerful and easy to use (Async/Await vs Promises). Babel allows us to experiment with next-generation JavaScript (features that are not in the official JavaScript spec yet). Yarn allows us to consistently install packages quickly (and is filled with tons of new tricks)

We’re using JavaScript for everything – both front and backend. Most of our team is experienced with Go and Python, so Node was not an obvious choice for this app.

Sure... there will be haters who refuse to acknowledge that there is anything remotely positive about JavaScript (there are even rants on Hacker News about Node.js); however, without writing completely in JavaScript, we would not have seen the results we did.

#FrameworksFullStack #Languages

See more
Visual Studio Code logo

Visual Studio Code

85.8K
71.1K
2.1K
Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft
85.8K
71.1K
+ 1
2.1K
PROS OF VISUAL STUDIO CODE
  • 317
    Powerful multilanguage IDE
  • 284
    Fast
  • 182
    Front-end develop out of the box
  • 150
    Support TypeScript IntelliSense
  • 131
    Very basic but free
  • 113
    Git integration
  • 97
    Intellisense
  • 72
    Faster than Atom
  • 44
    Better ui, easy plugins, and nice git integration
  • 41
    Great Refactoring Tools
  • 38
    Good Plugins
  • 36
    Superb markdown support
  • 34
    Terminal
  • 31
    Open Source
  • 25
    Large & up-to-date extension community
  • 24
    Extensions
  • 22
    Powerful and fast
  • 22
    Awesome UI
  • 20
    Portable
  • 16
    Best editor
  • 15
    Best code editor
  • 14
    Open, cross-platform, fast, monthly updates
  • 14
    Easy to get started with
  • 14
    Built on Electron
  • 13
    Good for begginers
  • 13
    Crossplatform
  • 11
    All Languages Support
  • 11
    Extensible
  • 11
    Lots of extensions
  • 10
    Ui design is great
  • 10
    Extensions for everything
  • 10
    Totally customizable
  • 10
    Faster edit for slow computer
  • 10
    Git out of the box
  • 10
    Useful for begginer
  • 10
    Easy to use and learn
  • 10
    "fast, stable & easy to use"
  • 9
    It has terminal and there are lots of shortcuts in it
  • 8
    Great language support
  • 8
    Works With Almost EveryThing You Need
  • 8
    Great community
  • 8
    SSH support
  • 7
    Fast Startup
  • 7
    Great document formater
  • 7
    Features rich
  • 7
    Powerful Debugger
  • 6
    He is not Michael
  • 6
    Can compile and run .py files
  • 6
    Awesome multi cursor support
  • 6
    Python extension is fast
  • 6
    She is not Rachel
  • 5
    Extension Echosystem
  • 5
    Language server client
  • 5
    SFTP Workspace
  • 5
    Easy azure
  • 4
    VSCode.pro Course makes it easy to learn
  • 4
    Very proffesional
  • 4
    Has better support and more extentions for debugging
  • 3
    Excellent as git difftool and mergetool
  • 3
    Virtualenv integration
  • 3
    'batteries included'
  • 3
    Has more than enough languages for any developer
  • 2
    Emmet preinstalled
  • 2
    VS Code Server: Browser version of VS Code
  • 2
    Fast and ruby is built right in
  • 2
    Better autocompletes than Atom
  • 2
    CMake support with autocomplete
  • 2
    Supports lots of operating systems
  • 2
    Light
  • 2
    More tools to integrate with vs
CONS OF VISUAL STUDIO CODE
  • 31
    Slow startup
  • 18
    Resource hog at times
  • 16
    Poor refactoring
  • 9
    Poor UI Designer
  • 8
    Weak Ui design tools
  • 6
    Poor autocomplete
  • 4
    Microsoft
  • 4
    Poor in PHP
  • 3
    Poor at Python
  • 2
    Poor intellisense. poor java
  • 2
    Super Slow
  • 1
    Dilshad
  • 1
    Poor in Python
  • 1
    Microsoft sends telemetry data
  • 1
    Huge cpu usage with few installed extension
  • 1
    No color Intergrator
  • 1
    No Built in Browser Preview
  • 1
    Very basic for java development and buggy at times
  • 1
    No built in live Preview

related Visual Studio Code posts

Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 28 upvotes · 2.6M views

Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

  • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
  • Respectively Git as revision control system
  • SourceTree as Git GUI
  • Visual Studio Code as IDE
  • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
  • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
  • SonarQube as quality gate
  • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
  • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
  • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
  • Heroku for deploying in test environments
  • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
  • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
  • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
  • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
  • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

  • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
  • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
  • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
  • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
  • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
  • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
See more
Johnny Bell
Software Engineer at Weedmaps · | 19 upvotes · 521.5K views

I've been in the #frontend game for about 7 years now. I started coding in Sublime Text because all of the tutorials I was doing back then everyone was using it. I found the speed amazing compared to some other tools at the time. I kept using Sublime Text for about 4-5 years.

I find Sublime Text lacks some functionality, after all it is just a text editor rather than a full fledged IDE. I finally converted over to PhpStorm as I was working with Magento and Magento as you know is mainly #PHP based.

This was amazing all the features in PhpStorm I loved, the debugging features, and the control click feature when you click on a dependency or linked file it will take you to that file. It was great.

PhpStorm is kind of slow, I found that Prettier was taking a long time to format my code, and it just was lagging a lot so I was looking for alternatives. After watching some more tutorial videos I noticed that everyone was using Visual Studio Code. So I gave it a go, and its amazing.

It has support for everything I need with the plugins and the integration with Git is amazing. The speed of this IDE is blazing fast, and I wouldn't go back to using PhpStorm anymore. I highly recommend giving Visual Studio Code a try!

See more
IntelliJ IDEA logo

IntelliJ IDEA

26.8K
21K
1.5K
Capable and Ergonomic IDE for JVM
26.8K
21K
+ 1
1.5K
PROS OF INTELLIJ IDEA
  • 295
    Fantastically intelligent
  • 242
    Best-in-class ide
  • 190
    Many languages support
  • 154
    Java
  • 120
    Fast
  • 79
    Code analysis
  • 77
    Reliable
  • 75
    Out of the box integration with maven, git, svn
  • 63
    Plugin architecture
  • 60
    Integrated version control
  • 11
    Code refactoring support
  • 9
    Best java IDE
  • 6
    Local history
  • 5
    Integrated Database Navigator
  • 5
    Built-in terminal/run tools
  • 5
    Code Completion
  • 4
    Free for open-source development, students and teacher
  • 4
    All
  • 4
    Free If you're a Student
  • 3
    Cross platform
  • 3
    IDE
  • 3
    Kotlin
  • 3
    ERD Diagrams
  • 3
    Base for Android Studio
  • 3
    Database/Code integration
  • 2
    Server and client-side debugger
  • 2
    Free
  • 2
    More than enough languages for any developer
  • 2
    Typescript support
  • 2
    Multicursor support
  • 2
    Intuitive
  • 2
    Reformating Code
  • 2
    Command-line tools
  • 2
    Out Of The Box features
  • 2
    Android Integration
  • 2
    Vim support
  • 2
    Special icons for most filetypes in project list
  • 2
    Supports many frameworks
  • 2
    Built-in web server
  • 2
    Live Templates
  • 2
    Scala support
  • 1
    Works fine with mac os catalina
  • 1
    A lot of plugin
  • 1
    Just works
  • 1
    Integrated Ssh/Ftp Managers
  • 1
    Full support
  • 1
    Task managers
  • 1
    Diff tools
  • 1
    File Watchers
  • 1
    Support for various package managers
  • 1
    Integrated Code Linting
  • 1
    Its fake intellisense is better than real IntelliSense
  • 1
    Clean UI
  • 1
    Open source
  • 1
    Column Selection Mode
  • 1
    So modernised
  • 1
    Efficient, one Stop solution
CONS OF INTELLIJ IDEA
  • 18
    Large footprint required to really enjoy (mem/disc)
  • 13
    Very slow
  • 7
    Bad for beginners
  • 6
    UI is not intuitive
  • 5
    Not nearly as many tools to integrate as vs code
  • 4
    Constant reindexing
  • 3
    Needs a lot of CPU and RAM power
  • 2
    Doesn't work that well with windows 10 edu
  • 2
    Built in terminal is slow
  • 1
    Ruby is a plug in
  • 0
    AAD

related IntelliJ IDEA posts

christy craemer

UPDATE: Thanks for the great response. I am going to start with VSCode based on the open source and free version that will allow me to grow into other languages, but not cost me a license ..yet.

I have been working with software development for 12 years, but I am just beginning my journey to learn to code. I am starting with Python following the suggestion of some of my coworkers. They are split between Eclipse and IntelliJ IDEA for IDEs that they use and PyCharm is new to me. Which IDE would you suggest for a beginner that will allow expansion to Java, JavaScript, and eventually AngularJS and possibly mobile applications?

See more
Andrey Kurdyumov

I use Visual Studio because it provides me best default configuration for development. Less choice helps me concentrate on the product. In a sense it is iPhone of software development for me. When my laptop broke, I just download latest version of VS and start coding without any configuration. For sure it has best editor in terms of perceived responsiveness. Could not say the same for IntelliJ IDEA unfortunately.

See more
WebStorm logo

WebStorm

8.6K
6.5K
923
The smartest JavaScript IDE
8.6K
6.5K
+ 1
923
PROS OF WEBSTORM
  • 182
    Intelligent ide
  • 123
    Smart development environment
  • 105
    Easy js debugging
  • 93
    Code inspection
  • 92
    Support for the Latest Technologies
  • 52
    Created by jetbrains
  • 50
    Cross-platform ide
  • 35
    Integration
  • 29
    Spellchecker
  • 24
    Language Mixing/Injection
  • 10
    Debugger
  • 9
    Local History
  • 8
    Web developer can't live without this
  • 6
    Angular.js support
  • 6
    Git support
  • 6
    Fast search
  • 5
    There is no need to setup plugins (all from the box)
  • 5
    Show color on the border next to hex string in CSS
  • 5
    Smart autocompletion
  • 5
    FTP
  • 4
    Paid but easy to crack
  • 4
    JSON Schema
  • 4
    Awesome
  • 4
    Sass autocompletion
  • 4
    Built-in js debugger
  • 4
    Running and debugging Node.js apps remotely
  • 4
    Better refactoring options
  • 4
    A modern IDE stuck in the 90s
  • 3
    TypeScript support
  • 3
    Node.js integration
  • 3
    Smart coding assistance for React
  • 3
    111
  • 3
    Protractor support out of the box
  • 3
    Intelligent
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Vagrant and SSH Console
  • 2
    Dart support
  • 2
    Solid intelligent features
  • 2
    Docker intergration
  • 2
    Great app
  • 2
    Integrated terminal
  • 1
    Easier to keep running than eclipse
  • 1
    Unused imports inspection
  • 1
    Remote Files Syncronization
  • 1
    Free for students
  • 1
    Grate debug tools for React Apps
  • 1
    Thank you very much
  • 1
    Less autocompletion
  • 1
    Vim support
CONS OF WEBSTORM
  • 4
    Paid
  • 1
    Expensive

related WebStorm posts

Johnny Bell
Software Engineer at Weedmaps · | 11 upvotes · 338.4K views

When I switched to Visual Studio Code 12 months ago from PhpStorm I was in love, it was great. However after using VS Code for a year, I see myself switching back and forth between WebStorm and VS Code. The VS Code plugins are great however I notice Prettier, auto importing of components and linking to the definitions often break, and I have to restart VS Code multiple times a week and sometimes a day.

We use Ruby here so I do like that Visual Studio Code highlights that for me out of the box, with WebStorm I'd need to probably also install RubyMine and have 2 IDE's going at the same time.

Should I stick with Visual Studio Code, or switch to something else? #help

See more
Russel Werner
Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 7 upvotes · 331.7K views

We use Prettier because when we rebooted our front-end stack, I decided that it would be an efficient use of our time to not worry about code formatting issues and personal preferences during peer review. Prettier eliminates this concern by auto-formatting our code to a deterministic output. We use it along with ESLint and have 1st-class support in our WebStorm and Visual Studio Code editors.

See more
Visual Studio logo

Visual Studio

28K
21.9K
1K
State-of-the-art tools and services that you can use to create great apps for devices, the cloud, and everything...
28K
21.9K
+ 1
1K
PROS OF VISUAL STUDIO
  • 296
    Intellisense, ui
  • 236
    Complete ide and debugger
  • 161
    Plug-ins
  • 99
    Integrated
  • 90
    Documentation
  • 34
    Node tools for visual studio (ntvs)
  • 33
    Fast
  • 28
    Free Community edition
  • 21
    Simple
  • 16
    Bug free
  • 5
    Made by Microsoft
  • 4
    Full free community version
  • 3
    Productivity Power Tools
  • 3
    JetBrains plugins (ReSharper etc.) work sufficiently OK
  • 2
    VIM integration
  • 2
    Vim mode
  • 1
    The Power and Easiness to Do anything in any.. language
  • 1
    I develop UWP apps and Intellisense is super useful
CONS OF VISUAL STUDIO
  • 13
    Bulky
  • 12
    Made by Microsoft
  • 2
    Only avalible on Windows

related Visual Studio posts

Nicholas Rogoff

Secure Membership Web API backed by SQL Server. This is the backing API to store additional profile and complex membership metadata outside of an Azure AD B2C provider. The front-end using the Azure AD B2C to allow 3rd party trusted identity providers to authenticate. This API provides a way to add and manage more complex permission structures than can easily be maintained in Azure AD.

We have .Net developers and an Azure infrastructure environment using server-less functions, logic apps and SaaS where ever possible. For this service I opted to keep it as a classic WebAPI project and deployed to AppService.

  • Trusted Authentication Provider: @AzureActiveDirectoryB2C
  • Frameworks: .NET Core
  • Language: C# , Microsoft SQL Server , JavaScript
  • IDEs: Visual Studio Code , Visual Studio
  • Libraries: jQuery @EntityFramework, @AutoMapper, @FeatureToggle , @Swashbuckle
  • Database: @SqlAzure
  • Source Control: Git
  • Build and Release Pipelines: Azure DevOps
  • Test tools: Postman , Newman
  • Test framework: @nUnit, @moq
  • Infrastructure: @AzureAppService, @AzureAPIManagement
See more
Maria Naggaga
Senior Program Manager - .NET Team at Microsoft · | 7 upvotes · 341.3K views

.NET Core is #free, #cross-platform, and #opensource. A developer platform for building all types of apps ( #web apps #mobile #games #machinelearning #AI and #Desktop ).

Developers have chosen .NET for:

Productive: Combined with the extensive class libraries, common APIs, multi-language support, and the powerful tooling provided by the Visual Studio family ( Visual Studio and Visual Studio Code ), .NET is the most productive platform for developers.

Any app: From mobile applications running on iOS, Android and Windows, to Enterprise server applications running on Windows Server and Linux, or high-scale microservices running in the cloud, .NET provides a solution for you.

Performance: .NET is fast. Really fast! The popular TechEmpower benchmark compares web application frameworks with tasks like JSON serialization, database access, and server side template rendering - .NET performs faster than any other popular framework.

See more