What is GWT and what are its top alternatives?
Google Web Toolkit (GWT) is a comprehensive framework that allows developers to build and optimize complex web applications in Java. It offers features like cross-browser compatibility, rich user interfaces, and code reusability. However, GWT has limitations in terms of performance optimization and lacks modern JavaScript framework integrations.
Vaadin: Vaadin is a Java framework for building modern web applications that provides a complete set of customizable UI components. It offers a seamless integration with popular Java IDEs and tools. Pros: Rapid application development, rich component library. Cons: Steeper learning curve than GWT.
AngularDart: AngularDart is a web app framework based on Dart and Angular that allows for building high-performance web applications. Key features include two-way data binding and dependency injection. Pros: Better performance, deep integration with Angular ecosystem. Cons: Limited Java support compared to GWT.
ReactJS: React is a JavaScript library for building user interfaces that focuses on single-page applications. It offers a component-based architecture and virtual DOM for efficient rendering. Pros: Lightweight, vibrant community support. Cons: Requires additional tooling for full-stack development like servlets in GWT.
Vue.js: Vue.js is a progressive JavaScript framework for building interactive web interfaces. It features a simple and flexible API and is lightweight compared to other frameworks. Pros: Easy to learn, gradual integration into existing projects. Cons: Less mature ecosystem than GWT.
Polymer: Polymer is a JavaScript library that simplifies building web applications using Web Components. It provides a set of ready-to-use elements for fast development. Pros: Encourages component-based architecture, enhances reusability. Cons: Requires familiarity with Web Components standards.
Lit: Lit is a lightweight library for building fast, lightweight web components using lit-html templating. It prioritizes performance and functionality, making it suitable for scalable applications. Pros: Minimalist approach, efficient DOM updates. Cons: Limited documentation compared to GWT.
Thymeleaf: Thymeleaf is a modern server-side Java template engine for web and standalone environments. It offers natural template semantics and integrates well with popular Java frameworks. Pros: Seamless integration with Java ecosystem, easy to learn. Cons: Limited support for complex client-side interactions compared to GWT.
Svelte: Svelte is a radical new approach to building web applications with JavaScript that compiles code that updates the DOM when the state changes. It eliminates the need for a virtual DOM, resulting in leaner and faster applications. Pros: Minimal boilerplate, high performance. Cons: Relatively new, smaller community compared to GWT.
Grails: Grails is a full-stack web development framework for the JVM that combines the power of Groovy and Spring Boot. It simplifies Java web development by providing convention over configuration and seamless integration with popular Java tools. Pros: Rapid development, extensive plugin ecosystem. Cons: Might be overkill for smaller applications compared to GWT.
Play Framework: Play Framework is a lightweight, stateless web application framework that supports Java and Scala. It offers high development productivity with built-in testing and development tools. Pros: Scalability, asynchronous I/O support. Cons: Steeper learning curve for Java developers transitioning from GWT.
Top Alternatives to GWT
- JavaFX
It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms. ...
- Vaadin
It is the fastest way to build web applications in Java. It automates the communication between your server and the browser and gives you a high-level component API for all Vaadin components ...
- Angular
It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications. ...
- Spring
A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments. ...
- Dart
Dart is a cohesive, scalable platform for building apps that run on the web (where you can use Polymer) or on servers (such as with Google Cloud Platform). Use the Dart language, libraries, and tools to write anything from simple scripts to full-featured apps. ...
- React
Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project. ...
- JSF
It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community ...
- Blazor
Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML. ...
GWT alternatives & related posts
- Light10
- Community support less than qt1
- Complicated1
related JavaFX posts
I create desktop applications that use a database for storing data. My applications are used as management tools in supermarkets, stores, warehouses, and other places. I don't know which one to use; Electron or JavaFX. Can anyone advise me on this matter?
- Java9
- Compatibility7
- Components6
- Open Source6
- Performance3
- Example packages2
- Abstraction2
- OSGI Support1
- Paid for more features3
related Vaadin posts
- It's a powerful framework109
- Straight-forward architecture53
- TypeScript48
- Great UI and Business Logic separation45
- Powerful, maintainable, fast40
- Amazing CLI39
- Great mvc33
- Powerfull Dependency Injection29
- Easy to build19
- All in one Framework16
- Opinionated, batteries-included approach15
- Schematics11
- Solid Standard Setup.10
- Structured8
- Performance7
- Complex5
- Only for single page applications4
- Builders3
- RxJS2
- Ng upgrade2
- React1
- Overcomplicated9
- Large overhead in file size and initialization time9
- Ugly code2
- CLI not open to other test and linting tools2
related Angular posts
When Redash was created 5 years ago we chose AngularJS as our frontend framework, but as AngularJS was replaced by Angular 2 we had to make a new choice. We decided that we won't migrate to Angular, but to either React or Vue.js. Eventually we decided to migrate to React for the following reasons:
- Many in our community are already using React internally and will be able to contribute.
- Using react2angular we can do the migration gradually over time instead of having to invest in a big rewrite while halting feature development.
So far the gradual strategy pays off and in the last 3 major releases we already shipped React code in the Angular.js application.
From my experience of the early startup world, a majority of companies these days use Node.js. Python and Go are the next biggest languages, but significantly smaller than Node.
However, if you're having trouble with the front end aspect of Django, using Node probably won't make that easier for you. You'll have a lot more options between front end frameworks (React, Vue.js, Angular 2) , but they'll definitely take more time to learn than Django's templating system.
Think about whether you want to focus on front end or back end for now, and make a decision from there.
Spring
- Java230
- Open source157
- Great community136
- Very powerful123
- Enterprise114
- Lot of great subprojects64
- Easy setup60
- Convention , configuration, done44
- Standard40
- Love the logic31
- Good documentation13
- Dependency injection11
- Stability11
- MVC9
- Easy6
- Makes the hard stuff fun & the easy stuff automatic3
- Strong typing3
- Code maintenance2
- Best practices2
- Maven2
- Great Desgin2
- Easy Integration with Spring Security2
- Integrations with most other Java frameworks2
- Java has more support and more libraries1
- Supports vast databases1
- Large ecosystem with seamless integration1
- OracleDb integration1
- Live project1
- Draws you into its own ecosystem and bloat15
- Verbose configuration3
- Poor documentation3
- Java3
- Java is more verbose language in compare to python2
related Spring posts
Is learning Spring and Spring Boot for web apps back-end development is still relevant in 2021? Feel free to share your views with comparison to Django/Node.js/ ExpressJS or other frameworks.
Please share some good beginner resources to start learning about spring/spring boot framework to build the web apps.
I am consulting for a company that wants to move its current CubeCart e-commerce site to another PHP based platform like PrestaShop or Magento. I was interested in alternatives that utilize Node.js as the primary platform. I currently don't know PHP, but I have done full stack dev with Java, Spring, Thymeleaf, etc.. I am just unsure that learning a set of technologies not commonly used makes sense. For example, in PrestaShop, I would need to work with JavaScript better and learn PHP, Twig, and Bootstrap. It seems more cumbersome than a Node JS system, where the language syntax stays the same for the full stack. I am looking for thoughts and advice on the relevance of PHP skillset into the future AND whether the Node based e-commerce open source options can compete with Magento or Prestashop.
Dart
- Backed by Google59
- Flutter53
- Twice the speed of Javascript39
- Great tools35
- Scalable30
- Open source27
- Made for the future26
- Can be used on Frontend25
- Polymer Dart22
- Angular Dart22
- Cross platform18
- Like Java16
- Easy to learn14
- Dartanalyzer13
- Runs on Google Cloud Platform12
- Easy to Understand10
- Amazing concurrency primitives9
- Is to JS what C is to ASM8
- Flutter works with darts7
- R3
- Can run Dart in AWS Lambda3
- Looks familiar, with purposely implemented features1
- Lack of ORM3
- Locked in - JS or TS interop is very hard to accomplish3
- A0
related Dart posts
The only two programming languages I know are Python and Dart, I fall in love with Dart when I learned about the type safeness, ease of refactoring, and the help of the IDE. I have an idea for an app, a simple app, but I need SEO and server rendering, and I also want it to be available on all platforms. I can't use Flutter or Dart anymore because of that. I have been searching and looks like there is no way to avoid learning HTML and CSS for this. I want to use Supabase as BASS, at the moment I think that I have two options if I want to learn the least amount of things because of my lack of time available:
Quasar Framework: They claim that I can do all the things I need, but I have to use JavaScript, and I am going to have all those bugs with a type-safe programming language avoidable. I guess I can use TypeScript?, but that means learning both, and I am not sure if I will be able to use 100% Typescript. Besides Vue.js, Node.js, etc.
Blazor and .NET: There is MAUI with razor bindings in .Net now, and also a Blazor server. And as far as I can see, the transition from Dart to C# will be easy. I guess that I have to learn some Javascript here and there, but I have to less things I guess, am I wrong? But Blazor is a new technology, Vue is widely used.
Hi, I'm considering building a social marketplace app on android, ios and web, Flutter seems to be a good UI framework for cross-platform apps, it's safe type, hot reload, and native compiling on native machine code (thanks to Dart). My question is, for an MVP product is it a good choice? if yes, will it be on the mid-term, long term? Or will I have to change as the users grow?
thank you
- Components830
- Virtual dom672
- Performance578
- Simplicity507
- Composable442
- Data flow186
- Declarative166
- Isn't an mvc framework128
- Reactive updates120
- Explicit app state115
- JSX50
- Learn once, write everywhere29
- Easy to Use22
- Uni-directional data flow21
- Works great with Flux Architecture17
- Great perfomance11
- Javascript10
- Built by Facebook9
- TypeScript support8
- Speed6
- Server Side Rendering6
- Feels like the 90s5
- Excellent Documentation5
- Props5
- Functional5
- Easy as Lego5
- Closer to standard JavaScript and HTML than others5
- Cross-platform5
- Easy to start5
- Hooks5
- Awesome5
- Scalable5
- Super easy4
- Allows creating single page applications4
- Server side views4
- Sdfsdfsdf4
- Start simple4
- Strong Community4
- Fancy third party tools4
- Scales super well4
- Has arrow functions3
- Beautiful and Neat Component Management3
- Just the View of MVC3
- Simple, easy to reason about and makes you productive3
- Fast evolving3
- SSR3
- Great migration pathway for older systems3
- Rich ecosystem3
- Simple3
- Has functional components3
- Every decision architecture wise makes sense3
- Very gentle learning curve3
- Split your UI into components with one true state2
- Recharts2
- Permissively-licensed2
- Fragments2
- Sharable2
- Image upload2
- HTML-like2
- React hooks1
- Datatables1
- Requires discipline to keep architecture organized40
- No predefined way to structure your app29
- Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages28
- JSX13
- Not enterprise friendly10
- One-way binding only6
- State consistency with backend neglected3
- Bad Documentation3
- Error boundary is needed2
- Paradigms change too fast2
related React posts
I am starting to become a full-stack developer, by choosing and learning .NET Core for API Development, Angular CLI / React for UI Development, MongoDB for database, as it a NoSQL DB and Flutter / React Native for Mobile App Development. Using Postman, Markdown and Visual Studio Code for development.
I picked up an idea to develop and it was no brainer I had to go with React for the frontend. I was faced with challenges when it came to what component framework to use. I had worked extensively with Material-UI but I needed something different that would offer me wider range of well customized components (I became pretty slow at styling). I brought in Evergreen after several sampling and reads online but again, after several prototype development against Evergreen—since I was using TypeScript and I had to import custom Type, it felt exhaustive. After I validated Evergreen with the designs of the idea I was developing, I also noticed I might have to do a lot of styling. I later stumbled on Material Kit, the one specifically made for React . It was promising with beautifully crafted components, most of which fits into the designs pages I had on ground.
A major problem of Material Kit for me is it isn't written in TypeScript and there isn't any plans to support its TypeScript version. I rolled up my sleeve and started converting their components to TypeScript and if you'll ask me, I am still on it.
In summary, I used the Create React App with TypeScript support and I am spending some time converting Material Kit to TypeScript before I start developing against it. All of these components are going to be hosted on Bit.
If you feel I am crazy or I have gotten something wrong, I'll be willing to listen to your opinion. Also, if you want to have a share of whatever TypeScript version of Material Kit I end up coming up with, let me know.
- Rich and comprehensive Request Life-cycle2
- Very Mature UI framework1
- Server Side component1
related JSF posts
Hello guys! I would ask for your advice. Our situation is like that there will be a project to revamp workflows and introduce new services like mobile apps, machine learning, and some online services that would use cloud storage. We use JSF, JavaScript, Ajax, Spring, Oracle 12c running on Linux (VM) and providing online services to internal users and the public. But, we are not technically savvy enough to evaluate what tools should be introduced. Personally, I am evaluating whether to take this opportunity to change our practice/PM approach from Prince to Scrum/Agile (It seemed that DevOps is popular) ... Since we adopt ISO 27001 and ISO 20000, security is a crucial factor that we consider. Would you please help to recommend a list of tools and explain the reasons why you recommend them? Thanks in advance~!
I need to modernize a Java web application that runs on JSF. I am used to building websites, so Bootstrap kinda feels like "home." But when it comes to applications, I feel Bootstrap is not the right way to go. Can someone explain to me what PrimeFaces is capable of in comparison with BS?
Blazor
- Uses C#62
- No need to learn separate language or technology48
- Supports making a single page application41
- Tight integration with .NET project39
- Uses .NET standard library37
- Very little JavaScript required30
- Components29
- Shared classes between client and server27
- No need to compile, bundle and deploy separately27
- Cross Platform24
- Has Server AND Client hosting models21
- Very easy JavaScript interop if required18
- Third party state management i.e. Blazor-State17
- App state can be managed singleton objects14
- Portable Code across Mobile, Web and Desktop4
- Work with Electron/MAUI2
- Initial load time4
- Hard to inject javascript2
related Blazor posts
The only two programming languages I know are Python and Dart, I fall in love with Dart when I learned about the type safeness, ease of refactoring, and the help of the IDE. I have an idea for an app, a simple app, but I need SEO and server rendering, and I also want it to be available on all platforms. I can't use Flutter or Dart anymore because of that. I have been searching and looks like there is no way to avoid learning HTML and CSS for this. I want to use Supabase as BASS, at the moment I think that I have two options if I want to learn the least amount of things because of my lack of time available:
Quasar Framework: They claim that I can do all the things I need, but I have to use JavaScript, and I am going to have all those bugs with a type-safe programming language avoidable. I guess I can use TypeScript?, but that means learning both, and I am not sure if I will be able to use 100% Typescript. Besides Vue.js, Node.js, etc.
Blazor and .NET: There is MAUI with razor bindings in .Net now, and also a Blazor server. And as far as I can see, the transition from Dart to C# will be easy. I guess that I have to learn some Javascript here and there, but I have to less things I guess, am I wrong? But Blazor is a new technology, Vue is widely used.