Alternatives to Proton Native logo

Alternatives to Proton Native

Electron, React Native, React Desktop, NodeGUI, and JavaFX are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Proton Native.
22
162
+ 1
9

What is Proton Native and what are its top alternatives?

Create native desktop applications through a React syntax, on all platforms.
Proton Native is a tool in the Cross-Platform Desktop Development category of a tech stack.
Proton Native is an open source tool with 10.9K GitHub stars and 392 GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Proton Native's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Proton Native

  • Electron
    Electron

    With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor. ...

  • React Native
    React Native

    React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native. ...

  • React Desktop
    React Desktop

    react-desktop is a JavaScript library built ontop of Facebook's React library, which aims to bring a native desktop experience to the web, featuring many OS X El Capitan and Windows 10 components. react-desktop works perfectly with node-webkit and Electron.js, but can be used in any JavaScript powered project! ...

  • NodeGUI
    NodeGUI

    It is an open source library for building cross-platform native desktop applications with JavaScript and CSS like styling. It is based on Qt5 and NOT chromium, hence it is memory and cpu efficient. ...

  • JavaFX
    JavaFX

    It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms. ...

  • Qt5
    Qt5

    It is a full development framework with tools designed to streamline the creation of applications and user interfaces for desktop, embedded, and mobile platforms. ...

  • pygame
    pygame

    It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language. ...

  • Element
    Element

    Element is a Vue 2.0 based component library for developers, designers and product managers, with a set of design resources. ...

Proton Native alternatives & related posts

Electron logo

Electron

8.7K
7.9K
137
Build cross platform desktop apps with JavaScript, HTML, and CSS
8.7K
7.9K
+ 1
137
PROS OF ELECTRON
  • 66
    Easy to make rich cross platform desktop applications
  • 50
    Open source
  • 12
    Great looking apps such as Slack and Visual Studio Code
  • 6
    Because it's cross platform
  • 3
    Use Node.js in the Main Process
CONS OF ELECTRON
  • 17
    Uses a lot of memory
  • 8
    User experience never as good as a native app
  • 4
    No proper documentation
  • 4
    Does not native
  • 1
    Each app needs to install a new chromium + nodejs
  • 1
    Wrong reference for dom inspection

related Electron posts

Slack's new desktop application was launched for macOS. It was built using Electron for a faster, frameless look with a host of background improvements for a superior Slack experience. Instead of adopting a complete-in-box approach taken by other apps, Slack prefers a hybrid approach where some of the assets are loaded as part of the app, while others are made available remotely. Slack's original desktop app was written using the MacGap v1 framework using WebView to host web content within the native app frame. But it was difficult to upgrade with new features only available to Apple's WKWebView and moving to this view called for a total application rewrite.

Electron brings together Chromium's rendering engine with the Node.js runtime and module system. The new desktop app is now based on an ES6 + async/await React application is currently being moved gradually to TypeScript. Electron functions on Chromium's multi-process model, with each Slack team signed into a separate process and memory space. It also helps prevent remote content to directly access desktop features using a feature called WebView Element which creates a fresh Chromium renderer process and assigns rendering of content for its hosting renderer. Additional security can be ensured by preventing Node.js modules from leaking into the API surface and watching out for APIs with file paths. Communication between processes on Electron is carried out via electron-remote, a pared-down, zippy version of Electron's remote module, which makes implementing the web apps UI much easier.

See more

The Slack desktop app was originally written us the MacGap framework, which used Apple’s WebView to host web content inside of a native app frame. As this approach continued to present product limitations, Slack decided to migrate the desktop app to Electron. Electron is a platform that combines the rendering engine from Chromium and the Node.js runtime and module system. The desktop app is written as a modern ES6 + async/await React application.

For the desktop app, Slack takes a hybrid approach, wherein some of the assets ship as part of the app, but most of their assets and code are loaded remotely.

See more
React Native logo

React Native

25.7K
22.4K
1.1K
A framework for building native apps with React
25.7K
22.4K
+ 1
1.1K
PROS OF REACT NATIVE
  • 204
    Learn once write everywhere
  • 166
    Cross platform
  • 162
    Javascript
  • 118
    Native ios components
  • 67
    Built by facebook
  • 62
    Easy to learn
  • 43
    Bridges me into ios development
  • 40
    It's just react
  • 39
    No compile
  • 36
    Declarative
  • 21
    Fast
  • 12
    Virtual Dom
  • 12
    Livereload
  • 11
    Insanely fast develop / test cycle
  • 10
    Great community
  • 9
    Easy setup
  • 9
    Backed by Facebook
  • 9
    It is free and open source
  • 8
    Native android components
  • 7
    Highly customizable
  • 6
    Scalable
  • 6
    Everything component
  • 6
    Awesome
  • 6
    Win win solution of hybrid app
  • 6
    Great errors
  • 5
    Not dependent on anything such as Angular
  • 5
    Simple
  • 4
    OTA update
  • 4
    Awesome, easy starting from scratch
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 3
    As good as Native without any performance concerns
  • 2
    Web development meets Mobile development
  • 2
    Hot reload
  • 2
    Over the air update (Flutter lacks)
  • 2
    'It's just react'
  • 2
    Many salary
  • 2
    Can be incrementally added to existing native apps
  • 1
    Nigger
  • 1
    Cons
  • 1
    Ngon
  • 0
    Ful
CONS OF REACT NATIVE
  • 23
    Javascript
  • 18
    Built by facebook
  • 12
    Cant use CSS
  • 4
    30 FPS Limit
  • 2
    Slow
  • 2
    Some compenents not truly native
  • 2
    Generate large apk even for a simple app

related React Native posts

Vaibhav Taunk
Team Lead at Technovert · | 31 upvotes · 1.9M views

I am starting to become a full-stack developer, by choosing and learning .NET Core for API Development, Angular CLI / React for UI Development, MongoDB for database, as it a NoSQL DB and Flutter / React Native for Mobile App Development. Using Postman, Markdown and Visual Studio Code for development.

See more

I'm working as one of the engineering leads in RunaHR. As our platform is a Saas, we thought It'd be good to have an API (We chose Ruby and Rails for this) and a SPA (built with React and Redux ) connected. We started the SPA with Create React App since It's pretty easy to start.

We use Jest as the testing framework and react-testing-library to test React components. In Rails we make tests using RSpec.

Our main database is PostgreSQL, but we also use MongoDB to store some type of data. We started to use Redis  for cache and other time sensitive operations.

We have a couple of extra projects: One is an Employee app built with React Native and the other is an internal back office dashboard built with Next.js for the client and Python in the backend side.

Since we have different frontend apps we have found useful to have Bit to document visual components and utils in JavaScript.

See more
React Desktop logo

React Desktop

14
162
0
React UI Components for OS X El Capitan and Windows 10
14
162
+ 1
0
PROS OF REACT DESKTOP
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF REACT DESKTOP
      Be the first to leave a con

      related React Desktop posts

      NodeGUI logo

      NodeGUI

      10
      93
      6
      A library for building cross-platform native desktop applications
      10
      93
      + 1
      6
      PROS OF NODEGUI
      • 1
        Easy to make cross platform & resource efficient apps
      • 1
        Has React & Vue support named (react|vue)-nodegui
      • 1
        It uses Qode which is a fork of Node to be used with QT
      • 1
        No webkit thus super resource efficient
      • 1
        Its not hybrid & fully native.
      • 1
        Rich API which binds C++ QT
      CONS OF NODEGUI
      • 1
        Doesn't have x86 support

      related NodeGUI posts

      JavaFX logo

      JavaFX

      235
      321
      9
      A Java library for building Rich Internet Applications
      235
      321
      + 1
      9
      PROS OF JAVAFX
      • 9
        Light
      CONS OF JAVAFX
      • 1
        Community support less than qt
      • 1
        Complicated

      related JavaFX posts

      Qt5 logo

      Qt5

      79
      106
      6
      A free and open-source widget toolkit
      79
      106
      + 1
      6
      PROS OF QT5
      • 1
        Fast enough
      • 1
        Very good documentation
      • 1
        C++
      • 1
        Open source
      • 1
        Cross platform
      • 1
        Easy to learn and use
      CONS OF QT5
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Qt5 posts

        pygame logo

        pygame

        67
        122
        4
        Open Source python programming language library for making multimedia applications
        67
        122
        + 1
        4
        PROS OF PYGAME
        • 2
          Easy to install
        • 1
          Simple
        • 1
          Lightweigt by only being 12 mb
        CONS OF PYGAME
        • 2
          Has only 2d
        • 1
          Slow

        related pygame posts

        Element logo

        Element

        62
        85
        3
        A Vue 2.0-based desktop UI library for developers, designers and PMs
        62
        85
        + 1
        3
        PROS OF ELEMENT
        • 3
          Very complete solution
        CONS OF ELEMENT
        • 2
          Buggy in parts

        related Element posts