Amazon SQS vs. ActiveMQ vs. Kestrel

Get help choosing one of these Get news updates about these tools


Amazon SQS

ActiveMQ

Kestrel

Favorites

21

Favorites

4

Favorites

1

Hacker News, Reddit, Stack Overflow Stats

  • -
  • 6
  • 1.58K
  • -
  • 46
  • 4.7K
  • -
  • 458
  • 119

GitHub Stats

No public GitHub repository stats available

Description

What is Amazon SQS?

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

What is ActiveMQ?

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

What is Kestrel?

Kestrel is based on Blaine Cook's "starling" simple, distributed message queue, with added features and bulletproofing, as well as the scalability offered by actors and the JVM.

Pros about this tool

Pros
Why do you like Amazon SQS?

Pros
Why do you like ActiveMQ?

Pros
Why do you like Kestrel?

Cta desktop@2x

Pricing

Amazon SQS Pricing

Companies

321 Companies Using Amazon SQS
29 Companies Using ActiveMQ
2 Companies Using Kestrel

Integrations

Amazon SQS Integrations
ActiveMQ Integrations
No integrations listed yet

What are some alternatives to Amazon SQS, ActiveMQ, and Kestrel?

  • RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is a messaging broker - an intermediary for messaging
  • Kafka - Distributed, fault tolerant, high throughput pub-sub messaging system
  • Celery - Distributed task queue
  • ZeroMQ - Fast, lightweight messaging library that allows you to design complex communication system without much effort

See all alternatives to Amazon SQS



Interest Over Time


Get help choosing one of these
Cta desktop@2x