ActiveMQ vs DoctorKafka vs Apache RocketMQ

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

ActiveMQ

440
1.1K
+ 1
75
DoctorKafka

4
17
+ 1
0
Apache RocketMQ

32
135
+ 1
8
Get Advice from developers at your company using Private StackShare. Sign up for Private StackShare.
Learn More
Pros of ActiveMQ
Pros of DoctorKafka
Pros of Apache RocketMQ
  • 16
    Easy to use
  • 13
    Open source
  • 12
    Efficient
  • 10
    JMS compliant
  • 6
    High Availability
  • 5
    Scalable
  • 3
    Support XA (distributed transactions)
  • 3
    Persistence
  • 2
    Distributed Network of brokers
  • 1
    Highly configurable
  • 1
    Docker delievery
  • 0
    RabbitMQ
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 2
      Million-level message accumulation capacity in a single
    • 2
      Support tracing message and transactional message
    • 1
      BigData Friendly
    • 1
      High throughput messaging
    • 1
      Feature-rich administrative dashboard for configuration
    • 1
      Low latency

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of ActiveMQ
    Cons of DoctorKafka
    Cons of Apache RocketMQ
    • 1
      Low resilience to exceptions and interruptions
    • 1
      Difficult to scale
    • 1
      Support
      Be the first to leave a con
        Be the first to leave a con

        Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

        What is ActiveMQ?

        Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

        What is DoctorKafka?

        DoctorKafka can automatically detect broker failure and reassign the workload on the failed nodes to other nodes. DoctorKafka can also perform load balancing based on topic partitions's network usage, and makes sure that broker network usage does not exceed the defined settings.

        What is Apache RocketMQ?

        Apache RocketMQ is a distributed messaging and streaming platform with low latency, high performance and reliability, trillion-level capacity and flexible scalability.

        Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

        What companies use ActiveMQ?
        What companies use DoctorKafka?
        What companies use Apache RocketMQ?
          No companies found

          Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

          What tools integrate with ActiveMQ?
          What tools integrate with DoctorKafka?
          What tools integrate with Apache RocketMQ?

          Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

          Blog Posts

          What are some alternatives to ActiveMQ, DoctorKafka, and Apache RocketMQ?
          RabbitMQ
          RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
          Kafka
          Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
          Apollo
          Build a universal GraphQL API on top of your existing REST APIs, so you can ship new application features fast without waiting on backend changes.
          IBM MQ
          It is a messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and business data across multiple platforms. It offers proven, enterprise-grade messaging capabilities that skillfully and safely move information.
          ZeroMQ
          The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.
          See all alternatives