ActiveMQ vs RabbitMQ vs Starling

ActiveMQ
ActiveMQ

177
200
39
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ

4.2K
2.9K
449
Starling
Starling

3
5
0

What is ActiveMQ?

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

What is RabbitMQ?

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

What is Starling?

Starling is a powerful but simple messaging server that enables reliable distributed queuing with an absolutely minimal overhead. It speaks the MemCache protocol for maximum cross-platform compatibility. Any language that speaks MemCache can take advantage of Starling's queue facilities.

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose ActiveMQ?
Why do developers choose RabbitMQ?
Why do developers choose Starling?
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    What are the cons of using ActiveMQ?
    What are the cons of using RabbitMQ?
    What are the cons of using Starling?
      Be the first to leave a con
        Be the first to leave a con
        What companies use ActiveMQ?
        What companies use RabbitMQ?
        What companies use Starling?

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with ActiveMQ?
        What tools integrate with RabbitMQ?
        What tools integrate with Starling?
          No integrations found

          Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

          What are some alternatives to ActiveMQ, RabbitMQ, and Starling?
          Kafka
          Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
          Apollo
          Build a universal GraphQL API on top of your existing REST APIs, so you can ship new application features fast without waiting on backend changes.
          Amazon SQS
          Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.
          Celery
          Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.
          ZeroMQ
          The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.
          See all alternatives
          Decisions about ActiveMQ, RabbitMQ, and Starling
          No stack decisions found
          Interest over time
          Reviews of ActiveMQ, RabbitMQ, and Starling
          Review ofRabbitMQRabbitMQ

          I developed one of the largest queue based medical results delivery systems in the world, 18,000+ queues and still growing over a decade later all using MQSeries, later called Websphere MQ. When I left that company I started using RabbitMQ after doing some research on free offerings.. it works brilliantly and is incredibly flexible from small scale single instance use to large scale multi-server - multi-site architectures.

          If you can think in queues then RabbitMQ should be a viable solution for integrating disparate systems.

          How developers use ActiveMQ, RabbitMQ, and Starling
          Avatar of Cloudify
          Cloudify uses RabbitMQRabbitMQ

          The poster child for scalable messaging systems, RabbitMQ has been used in countless large scale systems as the messaging backbone of any large cluster, and has proven itself time and again in many production settings.

          Avatar of Chris Saylor
          Chris Saylor uses RabbitMQRabbitMQ

          Rabbit acts as our coordinator for all actions that happen during game time. All worker containers connect to rabbit in order to receive game events and emit their own events when applicable.

          Avatar of Clarabridge Engage
          Clarabridge Engage uses RabbitMQRabbitMQ

          Used as central Message Broker; off-loading tasks to be executed asynchronous, used as communication tool between different microservices, used as tool to handle peaks in incoming data, etc.

          Avatar of Analytical Informatics
          Analytical Informatics uses RabbitMQRabbitMQ

          RabbitMQ is the enterprise message bus for our platform, providing infrastructure for managing our ETL queues, real-time event notifications for applications, and audit logging.

          Avatar of Packet
          Packet uses RabbitMQRabbitMQ

          RabbitMQ is an all purpose queuing service for our stack. We use it for user facing jobs as well as keeping track of behind the scenes jobs.

          Avatar of Casey Smith
          Casey Smith uses ActiveMQActiveMQ

          Remote broker and local client for incoming data feeds. Local broker for republishing data feeds to other systems.

          How much does ActiveMQ cost?
          How much does RabbitMQ cost?
          How much does Starling cost?
          Pricing unavailable
          Pricing unavailable
          Pricing unavailable
          News about ActiveMQ
          More news
          News about RabbitMQ
          More news