StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Actix vs Yew Framework

Actix vs Yew Framework

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Yew Framework
Yew Framework
Stacks24
Followers51
Votes0
Actix
Actix
Stacks148
Followers224
Votes14
GitHub Stars9.1K
Forks666

Actix vs Yew Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Actix and Yew Framework are both popular frameworks used in web development. While Actix is a web framework for building asynchronous applications, Yew Framework is a modern Rust framework for creating multithreaded front-end web applications. Despite their similarities, there are several key differences between Actix and Yew Framework that make them unique in their respective use cases.

1. Type of Applications:

Actix: Actix is primarily used for building asynchronous server applications in Rust. It provides a powerful actor system, allowing you to write efficient, scalable, and concurrent web applications. It is commonly used for building backend services or APIs.

Yew Framework: Yew Framework, on the other hand, is designed specifically for creating front-end web applications in Rust. It follows a component-based architecture, similar to popular JavaScript frameworks like React or Vue.js. Yew allows you to build interactive and responsive user interfaces using Rust.

2. Concurrency Model:

Actix: Actix utilizes an actor model for concurrency management. It provides a lightweight, isolated unit of concurrency called an actor, which maintains its own state and communicates with other actors asynchronously. This actor model allows for efficient handling of concurrent requests and ensures thread safety.

Yew Framework: Yew Framework utilizes Rust's ownership and borrowing system to ensure thread safety and manage concurrency. It follows a message-passing model, where components communicate with each other via messages. This approach allows for efficient concurrency management and eliminates many common pitfalls related to mutable state.

3. Server-side vs Front-end:

Actix: Actix is primarily focused on server-side development. It provides a set of tools and abstractions for building high-performance web applications on the server side. It excels in handling asynchronous tasks, such as handling multiple requests concurrently or managing long-running operations.

Yew Framework: Yew Framework is focused on front-end development. It enables developers to write web applications entirely in Rust, including the UI layer. Yew leverages Rust's strong type system and compilation guarantees to build robust and performant front-end applications.

4. Runtime Environment:

Actix: Actix is built on top of the Tokio runtime, a high-performance asynchronous runtime for Rust. It leverages Tokio's task management and reactor pattern to achieve high concurrency and efficiency. Actix also supports running on multiple threads, allowing developers to take full advantage of modern hardware.

Yew Framework: Yew Framework does not rely on any particular runtime environment. Instead, it utilizes Rust's native async/await syntax, allowing developers to write asynchronous code in a familiar and idiomatic way. This makes Yew compatible with various runtime environments without introducing any additional dependencies.

5. Server-side Rendering:

Actix: Actix does not provide built-in server-side rendering capabilities. It is primarily focused on building APIs or backend services, where client-side rendering is more commonly used. However, with additional libraries and tools, it is possible to implement server-side rendering in Actix applications.

Yew Framework: Yew Framework includes server-side rendering capabilities out of the box. This means that you can pre-render your application on the server and serve the initial HTML content to improve performance and enhance search engine optimization (SEO). Yew simplifies the process of setting up server-side rendering for your applications.

6. WebAssembly Support:

Actix: Actix fully supports WebAssembly, allowing you to build applications that can run directly in the browser. It provides efficient communication between the WebAssembly module and the server-side code, enabling seamless integration with browser-based front-end frameworks or libraries.

Yew Framework: Yew Framework is specifically built for WebAssembly and aims to provide a native Rust experience for front-end web development. It compiles to WebAssembly and offers high-performance, native-level capabilities for building complex web applications completely in Rust.

In summary, Actix is a powerful asynchronous web framework primarily used for server-side development, while Yew Framework is a modern Rust framework focused on front-end web development with native WebAssembly support and server-side rendering capability. Each framework has its own strengths and use cases, catering to different aspects of web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Yew Framework
Yew Framework
Actix
Actix

A modern Rust framework inspired by Elm and ReactJS. This framework is designed to be compiled into modern browsers' runtimes: wasm, asm.js, emscripten.

It is a simple, pragmatic and extremely fast web framework for Rust. Actors are objects which encapsulate state and behavior, they communicate exclusively by exchanging messages.

Compile into modern browsers' runtimes: wasm, asm.js, emscripten; Uses own virtual-dom representation; Put pure Rust code into HTML tags; Use single-line or multi-line Rust comments inside html-templates
Type Safe; Feature Rich; Extensible; Blazingly Fast
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
9.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
666
Stacks
24
Stacks
148
Followers
51
Followers
224
Votes
0
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 6
    Really really really fast
  • 3
    Very safe
  • 3
    Rust
  • 2
    Open source
Cons
  • 3
    Lots of unsafe code
Integrations
WebAssembly
WebAssembly
Rust
Rust
ExpressionEngine
ExpressionEngine
HTML5
HTML5
Rust
Rust

What are some alternatives to Yew Framework, Actix?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase