Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Aerobatic

15
17
+ 1
2
Convox

43
55
+ 1
37
Flynn

14
48
+ 1
16
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Aerobatic
Pros of Convox
Pros of Flynn
  • 1
    One line deploys from the command line
  • 1
    Enhance static site abilities with server-side plugins
  • 7
    Your own scalable Heroku in 5 minutes
  • 7
    It makes deployment management to AWS dependable.
  • 6
    Free, you only pay for AWS resources
  • 5
    Convox deploy - deploys your app in one command
  • 5
    Built on Docker
  • 4
    Quick to setup
  • 3
    Open Source
  • 6
    Free
  • 5
    Supports few types of containers:libvirt-lxc, docker
  • 2
    PostgreSQL HA
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 1
    12-factor methodology

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Aerobatic?

In a nutshell, it's a platform as a service (PaaS) for HTML5 web apps. You could think of it as Heroku for the front-end. It provides a streamlined developer workflow and a suite of cloud-based smart hosting modules that are highly complementary to your custom app code running in the browser.

What is Convox?

Convox is an open source Platform as a Service that runs in your own Amazon Web Services (AWS) account. Instead of signing up for a multi-tenant PaaS like Heroku, you can have your own. This gives you privacy and control over your platform and avoids the substantial markup on AWS prices that other platforms charge.

What is Flynn?

Flynn lets you deploy apps with git push and containers. Developers can deploy any app to any cluster in seconds.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Aerobatic?
What companies use Convox?
What companies use Flynn?
    No companies found

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Aerobatic?
    What tools integrate with Convox?
    What tools integrate with Flynn?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    GitHubDockerAmazon EC2+23
    12
    6566
    What are some alternatives to Aerobatic, Convox, and Flynn?
    Netlify
    Netlify is smart enough to process your site and make sure all assets gets optimized and served with perfect caching-headers from a cookie-less domain. We make sure your HTML is served straight from our CDN edge nodes without any round-trip to our backend servers and are the only ones to give you instant cache invalidation when you push a new deploy. Netlify is also the only static hosting service with integrated continuous deployment.
    BitBalloon
    BitBalloon deploys static sites from development to production in one step. Sites are automatically compressed, cached and pushed to a CDN. Any forms on the site will automatically work. BitBalloon is 100% programmable, everything from deployment to form handling can be controlled through the API. White label reseller options are available for using BitBalloon as a site publishing engine inside 3rd party authoring tools.
    Heroku
    Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.
    Google App Engine
    Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.
    Apache Camel
    An open source Java framework that focuses on making integration easier and more accessible to developers.
    See all alternatives