Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon DynamoDB vs MongoLab: What are the differences?
# Key Differences between Amazon DynamoDB and MongoLab
Amazon DynamoDB and MongoLab are both widely used database management systems, each with its own unique features and capabilities. Here are the key differences between the two platforms:
1. **Data Model**: Amazon DynamoDB is a fully-managed NoSQL database service that provides high-performance, scalable storage for structured data. It uses a key-value and document data model, making it suitable for applications with simple data access patterns. On the other hand, MongoLab is a Database-as-a-Service provider for MongoDB, a popular document-oriented database. MongoDB uses a flexible document data model, allowing for more complex data structures and relationships.
2. **Scalability**: Amazon DynamoDB is known for its seamless scalability, with automatic partitioning and replication across multiple data centers. It can handle large amounts of data and traffic without manual intervention. MongoLab, on the other hand, offers scalability through MongoDB's sharding capabilities, allowing for horizontal scaling across multiple servers. However, setting up and managing sharding in MongoDB requires more manual effort compared to DynamoDB.
3. **Consistency Models**: DynamoDB offers strong consistency for both read and write operations by default, ensuring that all clients see the same data at the same time. In contrast, MongoDB provides eventual consistency by default, where reads may not reflect the most recent write immediately. However, MongoDB allows users to choose between strong and eventual consistency based on their application requirements.
4. **Querying and Indexing**: DynamoDB supports querying using primary keys, secondary indexes, and scan operations. However, it does not provide the flexibility of ad-hoc querying like traditional SQL databases. In comparison, MongoDB offers rich querying capabilities, including support for ad-hoc queries, indexes, aggregation pipelines, and full-text search. This makes MongoDB more suitable for applications requiring complex querying and analytics.
5. **Transaction Support**: Amazon DynamoDB recently introduced transaction support, allowing developers to perform multiple operations atomically within a single transaction. This ensures data integrity across multiple items or tables. MongoLab, on the other hand, relies on MongoDB's multi-document transactions for atomic operations, providing similar transactional capabilities but with more manual configuration and management.
6. **Pricing Model**: DynamoDB charges users based on provisioned throughput capacity and storage usage, with options for on-demand pricing. In contrast, MongoLab offers flexible pricing based on database size, data transfer, and additional features like backups and dedicated clusters. Users can choose the pricing model that best suits their budget and usage patterns.
In Summary, Amazon DynamoDB and MongoLab differ in terms of data model, scalability, consistency models, querying capabilities, transaction support, and pricing model, catering to different use cases and application requirements in the database management space.
We are building a social media app, where users will post images, like their post, and make friends based on their interest. We are currently using Cloud Firestore and Firebase Realtime Database. We are looking for another database like Amazon DynamoDB; how much this decision can be efficient in terms of pricing and overhead?
Hi, Akash,
I wouldn't make this decision without lots more information. Cloud Firestore has a much richer metamodel (document-oriented) than Dynamo (key-value), and Dynamo seems to be particularly restrictive. That is why it is so fast. There are many needs in most applications to get lightning access to the members of a set, one set at a time. Dynamo DB is a great choice. But, social media applications generally need to be able to make long traverses across a graph. While you can make almost any metamodel act like another one, with your own custom layers on top of it, or just by writing a lot more code, it's a long way around to do that with simple key-value sets. It's hard enough to traverse across networks of collections in a document-oriented database. So, if you are moving, I think a graph-oriented database like Amazon Neptune, or, if you might want built-in reasoning, Allegro or Ontotext, would take the least programming, which is where the most cost and bugs can be avoided. Also, managed systems are also less costly in terms of people's time and system errors. It's easier to measure the costs of managed systems, so they are often seen as more costly.
Pros of Amazon DynamoDB
- Predictable performance and cost62
- Scalable56
- Native JSON Support35
- AWS Free Tier21
- Fast7
- No sql3
- To store data3
- Serverless2
- No Stored procedures is GOOD2
- ORM with DynamoDBMapper1
- Elastic Scalability using on-demand mode1
- Elastic Scalability using autoscaling1
- DynamoDB Stream1
Pros of MongoLab
- Development free tier61
- Easy setup46
- Scalable mongo hosting38
- Heroku plugin25
- REST API14
- High availability9
- Geospatial support9
- Replication and backups5
- Premium support5
- Multi-cloud2
- Largest and most experienced1
- Azure Add-on1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon DynamoDB
- Only sequential access for paginate data4
- Scaling1
- Document Limit Size1
Cons of MongoLab
- Lab bought by MongoDB. Being replaced by Atlas1