Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon RDS for Aurora vs Citus: What are the differences?
Introduction
Amazon RDS for Aurora and Citus are two popular database systems with distinct features. In this article, we will explore the key differences between Amazon RDS for Aurora and Citus.
- Scalability: Amazon RDS for Aurora is a highly scalable and flexible database that automatically scales storage and compute capacity to meet the demands of applications. It can handle millions of transactions per minute and provides instant scaling capabilities without any application downtime.
Citus, on the other hand, is designed specifically for scaling out Postgres horizontally. It extends Postgres to distribute data and queries across multiple nodes, allowing it to scale to billions of rows and handle high-performance workloads.
- Architecture: Amazon RDS for Aurora uses a distributed architecture with a clustered storage system. It replicates six copies of data across three availability zones to ensure durability and availability. It also provides automatic failover and self-healing capabilities.
Citus is an extension of Postgres and uses a distributed query engine to scale across multiple nodes. It partitions data and distributes it across the nodes. It also provides automatic query parallelism and intelligent routing.
- Data Distribution: Amazon RDS for Aurora uses a shared storage model where data is distributed across multiple nodes, but each node has access to the entire dataset. This allows for high availability and seamless failover.
Citus, on the other hand, partitions data into smaller pieces and distributes it across multiple nodes. Each node only contains a subset of the data, which allows for horizontal scaling and improved query performance.
- Query Optimization: Amazon RDS for Aurora uses a distributed query execution engine that optimizes queries for performance. It automatically parallelizes and distributes queries across the nodes, resulting in faster query execution.
Citus also provides query optimization capabilities by analyzing the query workload and creating query plans optimized for distributed execution. It leverages parallel processing and intelligent routing to efficiently execute queries across the node cluster.
- Cost: Amazon RDS for Aurora is a fully managed service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS). It has a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where customers are billed based on their utilization of resources. The cost includes storage, compute, and data transfer charges.
Citus is an open-source extension for Postgres and can be deployed on any cloud provider or on-premises infrastructure. Its cost depends on the infrastructure used to deploy and manage the cluster.
- Ecosystem: Amazon RDS for Aurora is part of the AWS ecosystem, which offers a wide range of services for building and managing applications. It integrates seamlessly with other AWS services such as Lambda, S3, and CloudWatch, providing a unified environment for application development and deployment.
Citus, being an open-source extension for Postgres, can be used in various environments and integrates well with the PostgreSQL ecosystem. It supports popular PostgreSQL extensions and can leverage existing tools and libraries.
In summary, the key differences between Amazon RDS for Aurora and Citus lie in their scalability, architecture, data distribution, query optimization, cost, and ecosystem integration.
Pros of Amazon Aurora
- MySQL compatibility14
- Better performance12
- Easy read scalability10
- Speed9
- Low latency read replica7
- High IOPS cost2
- Good cost performance1
Pros of Citus
- Multi-core Parallel Processing6
- Drop-in PostgreSQL replacement2
- Distributed with Auto-Sharding2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon Aurora
- Vendor locking2
- Rigid schema1