Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon Route 53 vs Amazon S3: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Amazon Route 53 and Amazon S3, two popular services offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) for handling DNS management and object storage respectively.
DNS Management vs. Object Storage: The main difference between Amazon Route 53 and Amazon S3 lies in their primary functions. Amazon Route 53 is a highly scalable and reliable DNS web service that allows users to manage domain names and route internet traffic to their applications, while Amazon S3 is an object storage service that provides secure storage and retrieval of data objects.
Service Type: Amazon Route 53 is a globally available, highly scalable DNS service, designed specifically for managing domain names and directing internet traffic. On the other hand, Amazon S3 is primarily an object storage service that offers storage for any kind of data, including images, videos, documents, and application backups.
Pricing Model: Amazon Route 53 follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on the number of hosted zones, the number of queries received, and any additional services used. In contrast, Amazon S3 has a tiered pricing structure that considers the amount of data stored, data transfer out, and any additional features utilized.
Data Availability: When it comes to data availability, Amazon Route 53 is responsible for routing internet traffic to various resources, ensuring reliable and efficient connectivity. Whereas Amazon S3 provides object-level durability, where each object stored in the bucket is redundantly stored across multiple devices in multiple facilities, ensuring high availability and durability.
Data Storage: While Amazon Route 53 does not store any data itself, it serves as a DNS service, directing traffic to the appropriate endpoints. Amazon S3, on the other hand, is designed specifically for storing and retrieving objects of virtually any size, offering industry-leading scalability and performance.
Access Control: Amazon Route 53 offers various access control mechanisms, allowing users to manage access to their DNS resources with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) policies and resource-based policies. In contrast, Amazon S3 offers fine-grained access control options, including bucket policies, access control lists (ACLs), and user policies, enabling users to define granular permissions for their stored objects.
In summary, Amazon Route 53 is a robust DNS management service, whereas Amazon S3 is an object storage service, each catering to different use cases. While Route 53 focuses on routing internet traffic and managing domain names, S3 is designed for scalable and secure storage of various types of data objects.
We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.
That's why we switched to S3 that just works.
Pros of Amazon Route 53
- High-availability185
- Simple148
- Backed by amazon103
- Fast76
- Auhtoritive dns servers are spread over different tlds54
- One stop solution for all our cloud needs29
- Easy setup and monitoring26
- Low-latency20
- Flexible17
- Secure15
- API available3
- Dynamically setup new clients1
- Easily add client DNS entries.1
Pros of Amazon S3
- Reliable590
- Scalable492
- Cheap456
- Simple & easy329
- Many sdks83
- Logical30
- Easy Setup13
- REST API11
- 1000+ POPs11
- Secure6
- Easy4
- Plug and play4
- Web UI for uploading files3
- Faster on response2
- Flexible2
- GDPR ready2
- Easy to use1
- Plug-gable1
- Easy integration with CloudFront1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon Route 53
- SLOW2
- Geo-based routing only works with AWS zones2
- Restrictive rate limit1
Cons of Amazon S3
- Permissions take some time to get right7
- Requires a credit card6
- Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly6
- Complex to set up3