IronMQ vs. Kestrel vs. Amazon SQS

Get help choosing one of these Get news updates about these tools


IronMQ

Kestrel

Amazon SQS

Favorites

3

Favorites

1

Favorites

21

Hacker News, Reddit, Stack Overflow Stats

  • 477
  • 257
  • 49
  • -
  • 458
  • 103
  • -
  • 4
  • 1.44K

GitHub Stats

No public GitHub repository stats available
No public GitHub repository stats available

Description

What is IronMQ?

An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance.

What is Kestrel?

Kestrel is based on Blaine Cook's "starling" simple, distributed message queue, with added features and bulletproofing, as well as the scalability offered by actors and the JVM.

What is Amazon SQS?

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

Pros about this tool

Why do you like IronMQ?

Why do you like Kestrel?

Why do you like Amazon SQS?

Cons about this tool

Pricing

IronMQ Pricing Amazon SQS Pricing

Customers

Integrations



Interest Over Time


Get help choosing one of these