Amazon SQS vs. IronMQ vs. Starling

  • -
  • 6
  • 1.84K
  • 477
  • 264
  • 48
  • 36
  • 1.46K
  • 0
No public GitHub repository stats available
No public GitHub repository stats available

What is Amazon SQS?

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

What is IronMQ?

An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance.

What is Starling?

Starling is a powerful but simple messaging server that enables reliable distributed queuing with an absolutely minimal overhead. It speaks the MemCache protocol for maximum cross-platform compatibility. Any language that speaks MemCache can take advantage of Starling's queue facilities.
Why do developers choose Amazon SQS?
Why do you like Amazon SQS?

Why do developers choose IronMQ?
Why do you like IronMQ?

Why do developers choose Starling?
Why do you like Starling?

What are the cons of using Amazon SQS?
Downsides of Amazon SQS?

What are the cons of using IronMQ?
Downsides of IronMQ?

What are the cons of using Starling?
No Cons submitted yet for Starling
Downsides of Starling?

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

How much does Amazon SQS cost?
Amazon SQS Pricing
How much does IronMQ cost?
IronMQ Pricing
How much does Starling cost?
What companies use Amazon SQS?
448 companies on StackShare use Amazon SQS
What companies use IronMQ?
14 companies on StackShare use IronMQ
What companies use Starling?
1 companies on StackShare use Starling
What tools integrate with Amazon SQS?
6 tools on StackShare integrate with Amazon SQS
What tools integrate with IronMQ?
10 tools on StackShare integrate with IronMQ
No integrations listed yet

What are some alternatives to Amazon SQS, IronMQ, and Starling?

  • RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is a messaging broker - an intermediary for messaging
  • Kafka - Distributed, fault tolerant, high throughput pub-sub messaging system
  • Celery - Distributed task queue
  • ActiveMQ - A message broker written in Java together with a full JMS client

See all alternatives to Amazon SQS

New CloudWatch Events – Track and Respond to Changes...
Rapid Auto Scaling with Amazon SQS
Amazon SQS – New Dead Letter Queue
On-Premises or On-Cloud? How to Make the Choice
AWS Fargate: Overview and Alternatives
Docker vs Kubernetes – How Do They Stack Up?
Daily API RoundUp: Starling Bank, ICObench, Estated,...


Interest Over Time