Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Apache Beam vs Google Cloud Dataflow: What are the differences?
<Apache Beam vs Google Cloud Dataflow>
1. **Integration with Multiple Processing Engines**: Apache Beam is a unified model that allows you to run your data processing pipelines on different processing engines such as Apache Flink, Apache Spark, and Google Cloud Dataflow. On the other hand, Google Cloud Dataflow is a fully managed service provided by Google Cloud Platform that specifically runs Apache Beam pipelines on its infrastructure, offering scalability, monitoring, and easy integration with other GCP services.
2. **Pricing Model**: Apache Beam is an open-source project and can be run on any cloud provider or on-premises without any additional cost. In contrast, Google Cloud Dataflow has a pay-as-you-go pricing model where you are charged based on the resources used and the processing power required for your pipelines, making it a more cost-effective solution for large-scale data processing projects.
3. **Managed Service Benefits**: While both Apache Beam and Google Cloud Dataflow support parallel processing, fault tolerance, and event-time processing, Google Cloud Dataflow provides additional benefits as a fully managed service such as automatic scaling, integration with other GCP services like BigQuery and Pub/Sub, and built-in monitoring and logging capabilities, reducing the operational overhead for managing the infrastructure. Apache Beam, on the other hand, requires more manual configuration and management of the underlying infrastructure.
4. **Data Source Connectivity**: Google Cloud Dataflow offers seamless integration with Google Cloud Storage, Bigtable, Datastore, and other GCP services, making it easier to ingest and process data from these sources. Apache Beam, being an open-source project, provides connectors to a wide range of data sources and sinks, including various file formats, databases, and messaging systems, making it more flexible in terms of data source connectivity.
5. **Community Support and Development**: Apache Beam has a strong community of contributors and users who actively provide support, contribute to the development of new features, and share best practices for building efficient data pipelines. Google Cloud Dataflow, while benefiting from the Apache Beam community, has dedicated support from Google Cloud Platform engineers for managing and optimizing data processing pipelines on the GCP infrastructure, ensuring timely updates and enhancements.
6. **Deployment Flexibility**: Apache Beam allows you to deploy your pipelines on different environments such as on-premises, cloud, or hybrid setups, giving you more flexibility in choosing where to run your data processing workloads. Google Cloud Dataflow, on the other hand, is specifically designed to run on the Google Cloud Platform, limiting the deployment options to GCP infrastructure but providing seamless integration with other GCP services for a more streamlined workflow.
In Summary, Apache Beam and Google Cloud Dataflow offer different advantages in terms of integration, pricing, managed services, data source connectivity, community support, and deployment flexibility for building and running data processing pipelines.
I need to design a pipeline for ingesting streaming data (video, audio, and telemetry) from remote video cameras to Cloud AI/ML services. Cameras can be wired or wireless. So connection can be unstable. The video should be processed separately from each camera. Telemetry and audio can be added in the future, for now, it's only video stream. Looking for a solution for GCP. Thanks!
Disclosure: I work on Beam and Dataflow.
I have seen Apache Beam and Cloud Dataflow used to develop pipelines processing data from IoT devices via PubSub. Beam also has connectors for Cloud AI services, like the Vision API[1]. If you can upload data to Cloud Storage, or stream it via PubSub, Beam has appropriate connectors for all of those.
I have no exposure to the services around Cloud IoT, but I believe they all work via PubSub, so they should integrate well with Dataflow.
Check the video in [2]: A use case that seems very similar to yours - they don't go into implementation details much, but it should give you an idea of the general architecture.
[1] https://beam.apache.org/releases/pydoc/2.25.0/apache_beam.ml.gcp.visionml.html
Pros of Apache Beam
- Open-source5
- Cross-platform5
- Portable2
- Unified batch and stream processing2
Pros of Google Cloud Dataflow
- Unified batch and stream processing7
- Autoscaling5
- Fully managed4
- Throughput Transparency3