StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Log Management
  4. Log Management
  5. Apache Solr vs Splunk

Apache Solr vs Splunk

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Splunk
Splunk
Stacks772
Followers1.0K
Votes20
Apache Solr
Apache Solr
Stacks224
Followers91
Votes0

Apache Solr vs Splunk: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Apache Solr and Splunk are both popular search and analytics platforms used by organizations to process and analyze their data. While they have similar functionalities, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Architecture and Purpose: Apache Solr is an open-source search platform that is based on Apache Lucene, a powerful and scalable information retrieval library. It is specifically designed for searching and indexing structured and unstructured data. On the other hand, Splunk is a proprietary platform that is built primarily for collecting and analyzing machine-generated data, such as log files, events, and metrics.

  2. Data Sources: Apache Solr can ingest data from a wide range of sources, including databases, file systems, and external APIs. It can handle both batch and real-time data processing. In contrast, Splunk is optimized for processing machine-generated data. It has built-in connectors and integrations for collecting data from various sources, including servers, network devices, applications, and cloud platforms.

  3. Indexing and Retrieval: Solr uses an inverted index to efficiently index and retrieve data. It provides advanced search capabilities, including faceted search, fuzzy search, and field highlighting. It also supports distributed indexing and searching for scalability. Splunk, on the other hand, uses a proprietary index structure called "Splunk index". It optimizes for fast searching and correlation of events, enabling users to search and navigate through large volumes of data quickly.

  4. Data Processing and Analytics: Solr provides basic analytics capabilities, such as aggregations, filtering, and sorting. It also integrates with Apache Hadoop and Apache Spark for advanced data processing and analytics. Splunk, on the other hand, offers extensive data processing and analytics features out of the box. It includes a search processing language (SPL) that allows users to perform complex queries, statistical analysis, and visualization on their data.

  5. Access Control and Security: Solr provides fine-grained access control and security features, allowing administrators to define roles and permissions for users. It also supports encryption and authentication mechanisms for data protection. Splunk, being an enterprise-grade platform, offers comprehensive access control and security capabilities. It includes features like user authentication, role-based access control, and data encryption to ensure data privacy and security.

  6. Licensing and Cost: Apache Solr is an open-source project and is licensed under the Apache License. It is free to use and can be modified and distributed without any licensing fees. Splunk, on the other hand, is a proprietary platform and is licensed based on the amount of data ingested and indexed. It has both free and paid versions, with the paid versions offering additional features and enterprise support.

In summary, Apache Solr and Splunk are both powerful search and analytics platforms, but they differ in their architecture, data sources, indexing and retrieval methods, data processing and analytics capabilities, access control and security features, as well as their licensing and cost models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Splunk
Splunk
Apache Solr
Apache Solr

It provides the leading platform for Operational Intelligence. Customers use it to search, monitor, analyze and visualize machine data.

It uses the tools you use to make application building a snap. It is built on the battle-tested Apache Zookeeper, it makes it easy to scale up and down.

Predict and prevent problems with one unified monitoring experience; Streamline your entire security stack with Splunk as the nerve center; Detect, investigate and diagnose problems easily with end-to-end observability
Advanced full-text search capabilities; Optimized for high volume traffic; Standards based open interfaces - XML, JSON and HTTP; Comprehensive administration interfaces; Easy monitoring; Highly scalable and fault tolerant; Flexible and adaptable with easy configuration
Statistics
Stacks
772
Stacks
224
Followers
1.0K
Followers
91
Votes
20
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Alert system based on custom query results
  • 3
    API for searching logs, running reports
  • 2
    Ability to style search results into reports
  • 2
    Query engine supports joining, aggregation, stats, etc
  • 2
    Dashboarding on any log contents
Cons
  • 1
    Splunk query language rich so lots to learn
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Splunk, Apache Solr?

Papertrail

Papertrail

Papertrail helps detect, resolve, and avoid infrastructure problems using log messages. Papertrail's practicality comes from our own experience as sysadmins, developers, and entrepreneurs.

Logmatic

Logmatic

Get a clear overview of what is happening across your distributed environments, and spot the needle in the haystack in no time. Build dynamic analyses and identify improvements for your software, your user experience and your business.

Loggly

Loggly

It is a SaaS solution to manage your log data. There is nothing to install and updates are automatically applied to your Loggly subdomain.

Apache Spark

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

Logentries

Logentries

Logentries makes machine-generated log data easily accessible to IT operations, development, and business analysis teams of all sizes. With the broadest platform support and an open API, Logentries brings the value of log-level data to any system, to any team member, and to a community of more than 25,000 worldwide users.

Logstash

Logstash

Logstash is a tool for managing events and logs. You can use it to collect logs, parse them, and store them for later use (like, for searching). If you store them in Elasticsearch, you can view and analyze them with Kibana.

Graylog

Graylog

Centralize and aggregate all your log files for 100% visibility. Use our powerful query language to search through terabytes of log data to discover and analyze important information.

Presto

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to manage, and you pay only for the queries that you run.

Sematext

Sematext

Sematext pulls together performance monitoring, logs, user experience and synthetic monitoring that tools organizations need to troubleshoot performance issues faster.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase