Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

API Tracker
API Tracker

0
6
+ 1
0
Paw
Paw

155
166
+ 1
148
Add tool

API Tracker vs Paw: What are the differences?

Developers describe API Tracker as "Track and manage the APIs you use". It is API integration reliability as a service. It helps developers build secure and reliable API integrations faster. With API Tracker, developers can have full visibility into their integration without having to log network calls and setting up APM. On the other hand, Paw is detailed as "The ultimate REST client for Mac". Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

API Tracker and Paw can be categorized as "API" tools.

Some of the features offered by API Tracker are:

  • Monitor all of your integrations in one dashboard
  • Receive real-time alerts for latency and errors
  • Increase reliability

On the other hand, Paw provides the following key features:

  • Organize your Requests, make Groups or sort by Host, Name, etc.
  • Easily build your requests, enjoy Formatters and Dynamic Values.
  • See Request and Response infos, headers, and body.
No Stats
- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is API Tracker?

It is API integration reliability as a service. It helps developers build secure and reliable API integrations faster. With API Tracker, developers can have full visibility into their integration without having to log network calls and setting up APM.

What is Paw?

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose API Tracker?
Why do developers choose Paw?
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

      Be the first to leave a con
      What companies use API Tracker?
      What companies use Paw?
        No companies found

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with API Tracker?
        What tools integrate with Paw?
          No integrations found

          Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

          What are some alternatives to API Tracker and Paw?
          Postman
          It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.
          Amazon API Gateway
          Amazon API Gateway handles all the tasks involved in accepting and processing up to hundreds of thousands of concurrent API calls, including traffic management, authorization and access control, monitoring, and API version management.
          Insomnia REST Client
          Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.
          Runscope
          Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.
          Apigee
          API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.
          See all alternatives
          Decisions about API Tracker and Paw
          Jason Barry
          Jason Barry
          Cofounder at FeaturePeek | 4 upvotes 233K views
          atFeaturePeekFeaturePeek
          Insomnia REST Client
          Insomnia REST Client
          Postman
          Postman
          Paw
          Paw
          Dropbox
          Dropbox

          We've tried a couple REST clients over the years, and Insomnia REST Client has won us over the most. Here's what we like about it compared to other contenders in this category:

          • Uncluttered UI. Things are only in your face when you need them, and the app is visually organized in an intuitive manner.
          • Native Mac app. We wanted the look and feel to be on par with other apps in our OS rather than a web app / Electron app (cough Postman).
          • Easy team sync. Other apps have this too, but Insomnia's model best sets the "set and forget" mentality. Syncs are near instant and I'm always assured that I'm working on the latest version of API endpoints. Apps like Paw use a git-based approach to revision history, but I think this actually over-complicates the sync feature. For ensuring I'm always working on the latest version of something, I'd rather have the sync model be closer to Dropbox's than git's, and Insomnia is closer to Dropbox in that regard.

          Some features like automatic public-facing documentation aren't supported, but we currently don't have any public APIs, so this didn't matter to us.

          See more
          Interest over time
          Reviews of API Tracker and Paw
          No reviews found
          How developers use API Tracker and Paw
          Avatar of Jack Littleton
          Jack Littleton uses PawPaw

          Paw allows me to interface with an API prior to starting UI work that requires the API. This helps me understand what data is required to be sent to the API, and what to expect back.

          In cases where I develop the API, Paw helps me to test as I'm developing, ensuring changes I make aren't breaking other parts of the API.

          How much does API Tracker cost?
          How much does Paw cost?
          Pricing unavailable
          News about API Tracker
          More news