StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Apollo vs Helios

Apollo vs Helios

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Helios
Helios
Stacks21
Followers74
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.2K
Forks233
Apollo
Apollo
Stacks2.7K
Followers1.8K
Votes25

Apollo vs Helios: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Apollo and Helios are two different platforms that provide different services and functionalities. Understanding the key differences between these platforms is essential for choosing the right one for your needs. Below are six key differences between Apollo and Helios.

  1. Scalability: Apollo is designed to handle large-scale applications and can efficiently manage a high number of concurrent users. It offers advanced features like distributed tracing and sharding, which allow for better scalability. On the other hand, Helios is primarily focused on smaller to mid-sized applications and may not provide the same level of scalability as Apollo.

  2. Monitoring and Observability: Apollo provides comprehensive monitoring and observability tools, including built-in metrics, real-time monitoring, and auto-generated performance graphs. It offers a user-friendly interface that allows developers to easily identify and troubleshoot performance bottlenecks. Helios, on the other hand, may have limited monitoring capabilities, requiring developers to use external tools for complete observability.

  3. Deployment Flexibility: Apollo provides various deployment options, including on-premise, cloud, and hybrid solutions. It integrates well with different cloud platforms and containerization technologies, allowing developers to choose the most suitable deployment environment. In contrast, Helios may have more limited deployment options, restricting the flexibility for developers.

  4. Language Support: Apollo supports a wide range of programming languages, including JavaScript, Java, Python, and more. This allows developers to work with their preferred language, increasing productivity and reducing the learning curve. Helios, on the other hand, may have limited language support, potentially limiting the options for developers.

  5. Development Experience: Apollo offers extensive documentation, tutorials, and a vibrant community, making it easier for developers to learn and work with the platform. It provides a rich set of development tools and frameworks that enhance the overall development experience. Helios may have a more limited ecosystem and community support, which can impact the development experience for developers.

  6. Integration Capabilities: Apollo provides seamless integration with various third-party tools and services, allowing developers to extend the functionality of their applications. It integrates well with popular frameworks and libraries, making it easier to incorporate additional features. Helios, on the other hand, may have more limited integration capabilities, potentially restricting the possibilities for developers.

In summary, Apollo and Helios differ in terms of scalability, monitoring and observability, deployment flexibility, language support, development experience, and integration capabilities. While Apollo offers advanced features, scalability, and extensive language support, Helios may be more suitable for smaller applications with limited monitoring and deployment options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Helios
Helios
Apollo
Apollo

Helios is a Docker orchestration platform for deploying and managing containers across an entire fleet of servers. Helios provides a HTTP API as well as a command-line client to interact with servers running your containers.

Build a universal GraphQL API on top of your existing REST APIs, so you can ship new application features fast without waiting on backend changes.

Helios is pragmatic.; Helios fits into the way you already do ops.;Hihgly scalable
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
233
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
21
Stacks
2.7K
Followers
74
Followers
1.8K
Votes
0
Votes
25
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 12
    From the creators of Meteor
  • 8
    Great documentation
  • 3
    Open source
  • 2
    Real time if use subscription
Cons
  • 1
    File upload is not supported
  • 1
    Increase in complexity of implementing (subscription)
Integrations
Docker
Docker
GraphQL
GraphQL

What are some alternatives to Helios, Apollo?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot