AppDynamics vs Inspeqtor vs Scout

Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AppDynamics
AppDynamics

131
167
+ 1
47
Inspeqtor
Inspeqtor

1
6
+ 1
1
Scout
Scout

60
45
+ 1
26
- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is AppDynamics?

AppDynamics develops application performance management (APM) solutions that deliver problem resolution for highly distributed applications through transaction flow monitoring and deep diagnostics.

What is Inspeqtor?

Inspeqtor monitors your application infrastructure. It gathers and verifies key metrics from all the moving parts in your application and alerts you when something looks wrong. It understands the application deployment workflow so it won't bother you during a deploy.

What is Scout?

Scout is application monitoring that points developers right to the source of problems: N+1 database queries, memory bloat, performance trends, and more. Scout eliminates much of the investigation part when performance woes occur.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose AppDynamics?
Why do developers choose Inspeqtor?
Why do developers choose Scout?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    Be the first to leave a con
      Be the first to leave a con
      What companies use AppDynamics?
      What companies use Inspeqtor?
      What companies use Scout?

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with AppDynamics?
      What tools integrate with Inspeqtor?
      What tools integrate with Scout?
        No integrations found

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        What are some alternatives to AppDynamics, Inspeqtor, and Scout?
        New Relic
        New Relic is the all-in-one web application performance tool that lets you see performance from the end user experience, through servers, and down to the line of application code.
        Nagios
        Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.
        Splunk
        Splunk Inc. provides the leading platform for Operational Intelligence. Customers use Splunk to search, monitor, analyze and visualize machine data.
        ELK
        It is the acronym for three open source projects: Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana. Elasticsearch is a search and analytics engine. Logstash is a server‑side data processing pipeline that ingests data from multiple sources simultaneously, transforms it, and then sends it to a "stash" like Elasticsearch. Kibana lets users visualize data with charts and graphs in Elasticsearch.
        Datadog
        Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!
        See all alternatives
        Decisions about AppDynamics, Inspeqtor, and Scout
        No stack decisions found
        Interest over time
        Reviews of AppDynamics, Inspeqtor, and Scout
        Avatar of coryvirok
        Co-Founder, CTO at Rollbar
        Review ofScoutScout

        We love Scout at Rollbar. Here's how we use it.

        Zero configuration monitoring for new hosts

        We have added Scout to our Ansible configuration for new host setup. So, when we provision a new machine, we get basic monitoring without any extra configuration. Once the host is up and running, we add it to the appropriate role in Scout and all of our monitoring plugins are magically deployed and enabled on the new host.

        Monitoring HTTP response codes

        One of the best things about Scout is how beautiful and therefore usable their graphs are. We have a Scout dashboard which shows all of our response codes which allows us to quickly see connections between different hosts when problems occur.

        Custom plugins!

        Scout's plugin model makes it really easy to extend. We have implemented our own log monitoring plugin which reports metrics like the 90th percentile of slow queries on our site. These types of plugins allow us to see issues at a glance during deploys, maintenance and load spikes.

        Slowly taking over Nagios

        Nagios is amazing, but let's be real... Anyone who has used it knows how painful it is to set up, administer and extend. We are in the process of cutting over from Nagios to Scout to handle more of our infrastructure monitoring and soon, alerting.

        Review ofScoutScout

        I'm a freelance developer with a handful of servers that needed insightful monitoring and alerts. I searched high and low across both hosted and self hosted solutions... paid and open source. While many are quite capable the self-hosted solutions were clunky and overkill. The few self-hosted for pay solutions costs structure were completely outside of a freelances budget. ScoutApp is the first that had the easy to use setup, amazing plugins for specific app monitoring and the price was actually affordable. Setup couldn't be easier. Plugins are handled amazingly with a single click that initiates the agent to install remotely. The interface is minimal and easy to read. Triggers are so well done and easy to setup with clear human language detailing the alert criteria. Real-time graphing is just icing on the cake.

        ScoutApp is great for not just small but enterprise level infrastructures as well. Added features such as roles, multi-user accounts, environments and even an API make growing with it a no brainer.

        Very well done and highly recommended.

        Avatar of manavo
        Doorbell.io
        Review ofScoutScout

        I used to have NewRelic on https://doorbell.io for my monitoring. It worked pretty well for the basic things, and the basic plan is free.

        However, as https://doorbell.io's stack got increasingly complicated, the plugins of NewRelic didn't work as well as I needed, in order to reliably monitor all aspects of the platform.

        I decided to try out Scout as an alternative, since even though it doesn't have a free plan, the basic plan is only $8/month (compared to $149 for NewRelic).

        I found the interface to be really good, and they have great documentation. I found plugins for every single part of my stack, and they all worked very easily "out of the box". And best of all, added practically no overhead to the server!

        So overall, I'd say it's a service that's well worth paying for. It's a steal at $8/month!

        Review ofScoutScout

        We migrated our infrastructure monitoring to Scout about six months ago when our previous monitoring solution became unreliable and cumbersome to maintain. We were pleasantly surprised at the ease of implementation and the library of plugins already available.

        The fine grain polling frequency and long term metric logging helped us maintain the high level of uptime our application requires. Moreover, due to the nature of the Scout protocol, changes to our specific application monitoring can be configured at a high level in their interface with a few clicks.

        For the few times we have been in communication with their support team to help sort our questions or clarify details, we have been thoroughly impressed at their response time and personalized attention to our needs.

        We highly recommend using Scout.

        Review ofScoutScout

        We are a very small non profit with a very simple server setup. Our two developers do not have any special training as sys admins. But it was very easy to get setup with Scout and start some simple monitoring of our servers. Most of what we do is check that some key processes are running and that our URLs are up. It was easy to do all of that with Scout. That said: we're interested in learning more about Scout's capabilities and doing more sophisticated server monitoring down the line.

        How developers use AppDynamics, Inspeqtor, and Scout
        Avatar of The Lens
        The Lens uses ScoutScout

        We are a very small non profit with a very simple server setup. Our two developers do not have any special training as sys admins. That said, it was very simple to get setup with Scout and start some simple monitoring of our servers. Most of what we do is check that some key processes are running and that our URLs are up. But we're interested in learning more aboutS Scout's capabilities/ doing more sophisticated server monitoring down the line.

        Avatar of Daniel Steel
        Daniel Steel uses AppDynamicsAppDynamics

        AppDynamics is used to monitor our full end to end user experience journey's including the infrastructure health.

        Avatar of Performance Assessment Network (PAN)
        Performance Assessment Network (PAN) uses AppDynamicsAppDynamics

        APM for our web apps, and rolling out of the End User Experience Monitoring

        Avatar of Cisco SSO
        Cisco SSO uses AppDynamicsAppDynamics

        Application Performance Monitoring and Management

        How much does AppDynamics cost?
        How much does Inspeqtor cost?
        How much does Scout cost?
        Pricing unavailable
        News about Inspeqtor
        More news