StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Low Code Platforms
  5. Appsmith vs CloudWright

Appsmith vs CloudWright

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CloudWright
CloudWright
Stacks0
Followers6
Votes0
Appsmith
Appsmith
Stacks57
Followers117
Votes0
GitHub Stars38.4K
Forks4.3K

Appsmith vs CloudWright: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Appsmith and CloudWright

Introduction:

Here are the key differences between Appsmith and CloudWright.

  1. Deployment Options: Appsmith provides flexible deployment options, allowing users to deploy their applications on any cloud server or on-premises infrastructure. CloudWright, on the other hand, is a cloud-native tool that offers deployment exclusively on the cloud.

  2. Supported Integrations: Appsmith offers a wide range of integrations with popular databases, APIs, and third-party tools, making it easier for developers to connect and interact with various data sources. CloudWright, though it also supports integrations, has a more limited set of integrations available compared to Appsmith.

  3. Code Complexity: Appsmith simplifies the development process by enabling users to build applications visually without the need for extensive coding. It provides a drag-and-drop interface and ready-to-use widgets, which reduces code complexity. CloudWright, on the other hand, requires developers to write code using its own programming language, which may be more suitable for users with advanced coding skills.

  4. Data Processing Capabilities: Appsmith offers powerful data processing capabilities, including the ability to create complex workflows, handle large datasets, and perform calculations and aggregations. CloudWright, while it provides some data processing features, may have more limitations and may not be as robust in terms of data manipulation.

  5. Scalability and Performance: Appsmith is designed to handle large-scale applications with high performance and scalability. It can efficiently manage multiple user sessions and handle a high volume of data. CloudWright, though it is scalable to some extent, may have limitations in terms of handling extremely high workloads or complex applications.

  6. User Interface Customization: Appsmith provides extensive customization options for the user interface, allowing developers to build highly tailored and visually appealing applications. CloudWright, on the other hand, may have more limited UI customization options.

In summary, Appsmith offers more deployment flexibility, a wider range of integrations, simplified visual development, advanced data processing capabilities, better scalability, and more extensive UI customization options compared to CloudWright.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

CloudWright
CloudWright
Appsmith
Appsmith

It is a platform which empowers anyone who can write Python to build reliable, powerful internal tools. By letting developers combine reusable connections to databases, services, and APIs, and by handling common last-mile barriers to internal application development — passwords, deployment, scaling, and monitoring — it lets either technical or semi-technical users translate ideas into tools fast and more reliably.

Open source framework to build, deploy and share internal apps. Use UI widgets like tables, charts, forms, maps, and more. Easily connect to DBs like Postgres, Mongo, MySQL++ or REST API/GraphQL and use JS anywhere.

Custom workflows; File automation; Report generation; Web IDE; Cloud REPL; Cloud First, Cloud Native
Deploy Appsmith on your servers in 5 minutes; Drag & drop, resize and style widgets without HTML / CSS; Query & update your database directly from the UI. Connect to PostgreSQL, MongoDB, MySQL, REST & GraphQL APIs; Write snippets of business logic using JS to transform data, manipulate UI or trigger workflows. Use popular libraries like lodash & moment anywhere in the app; Simple configuration to create flows when users interact with the UI; Changes in your application reflect instantly with every edit. No need to compile; Connect directly to any PostgreSQL, MySQL & MongoDB; Control who can edit / view your applications from a single control panel; Build and organise multiple applications on a single platform
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
38.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.3K
Stacks
0
Stacks
57
Followers
6
Followers
117
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Dropbox
Dropbox
Slack
Slack
GitHub
GitHub
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Datadog
Datadog
Twilio
Twilio
Asana
Asana
Jira
Jira
MySQL
MySQL
SMTP
SMTP
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
Shopify
Shopify
ArangoDB
ArangoDB
Fauna
Fauna
Cloud Firestore
Cloud Firestore
cURL
cURL
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
MySQL
MySQL
MongoDB
MongoDB

What are some alternatives to CloudWright, Appsmith?

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Stamplay

Stamplay

The API-based development platform enabling developers to do 80% of the job in 1% of the time thanks to: out of the box APIs for users and data, one-click integration with any API, scalable infrastructure and SDKs. Build Rome in a day.

Kumologica

Kumologica

It is the first low-code development solution that run your integration and automation services serverlessly on any cloud. It provides drag and drop visual designer and low code approach to ensure the greatest speed and flexibility to support a wide range of integrations compatible with most of the platforms and cloud providers.

Backand

Backand

Backand is a powerful backend-as-a-service for AngularJS that provides out-of-the-box social login, push notifications, Ionic integration and much more.

Stacker

Stacker

Stacker lets you turn your spreadsheets into applications. You plug in your Airtable or Google Sheets and Stacker automatically generates you app with login, forms and buttons. Stacker includes built in permissions, UI and business logic.

Magic xpa

Magic xpa

It enables rapid creation of cross-platform business applications for desktop, web and mobile, so you can take advantage of new business opportunities quickly and on-demand.

Knack

Knack

Build simple web apps like a member directory, job listings, employee time tracking, business directory, contact directory, product catalogue, or equipment tracker.

Mavo

Mavo

Mavo helps you turn your static HTML into reactive web applications without a single line of programming code.

iLeap

iLeap

ILeap is a low-code app development platform to build custom apps and automate workflows visually, helping you speed up digital transformation.

Google App Maker

Google App Maker

App Maker lets you develop powerful apps with relative ease. Create a model to manage your data, build a UI in the visual editor, use Apps Script to write some scripts, and you're on your way.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase