StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. AWS Device Farm vs Sauce Labs

AWS Device Farm vs Sauce Labs

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
Stacks314
Followers435
Votes439
AWS Device Farm
AWS Device Farm
Stacks74
Followers180
Votes5

AWS Device Farm vs Sauce Labs: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between AWS Device Farm and Sauce Labs. Both tools offer cloud-based testing services and are widely used by developers and testers to improve the quality of their mobile and web applications.

  1. Deployment Options: AWS Device Farm primarily focuses on native and hybrid mobile applications, offering extensive support for iOS and Android devices. It provides its own set of real devices in the cloud for testing, allowing users to run tests on a wide range of device configurations. On the other hand, Sauce Labs supports both web and mobile application testing. In addition to real devices, Sauce Labs also provides virtual machines for web application testing on different operating systems and browser versions.

  2. Integration with CI/CD Pipelines: AWS Device Farm seamlessly integrates with popular continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) tools like Jenkins, with plugins available for easy integration. It allows developers to automate testing as part of their CI/CD pipelines. Sauce Labs also offers similar integrations with industry-standard CI/CD tools, making it possible to run tests automatically by triggering them from the CI/CD pipeline stages.

  3. Testing Scalability: AWS Device Farm provides the ability to run tests on multiple devices concurrently, allowing for quick parallel execution of tests. It offers flexible scheduling options, allowing users to run tests in parallel on different devices or sequentially to ensure comprehensive test coverage. On the other hand, Sauce Labs offers even higher scalability with the capability to run tests in parallel across hundreds of virtual machines and real devices, enabling faster execution and shorter test cycles.

  4. Test Automation Frameworks: AWS Device Farm supports popular test automation frameworks such as Appium, Calabash, Espresso, and XCTest for mobile app testing. It also provides a built-in web-based test automation framework called AWS Device Farm TestNG Selenium. Sauce Labs supports a wide range of test automation frameworks including Selenium WebDriver, Appium, Protractor, and Espresso, making it highly versatile for different types of testing scenarios.

  5. Reporting and Analysis: AWS Device Farm provides detailed test execution reports, including logs, screenshots, and videos, to help diagnose and troubleshoot issues. It also integrates with AWS CloudWatch to collect real-time metrics for monitoring and analysis. Sauce Labs offers rich reporting capabilities with detailed information about test runs, screenshots, videos, and performance data. It also provides real-time analytics dashboards for monitoring and tracking test results.

  6. Integration with Third-Party Tools: AWS Device Farm can be seamlessly integrated with other AWS services such as AWS CodePipeline and AWS CloudFormation for streamlined application development and deployment. It also offers APIs for integrating with custom tools and frameworks. Sauce Labs provides integration with various third-party tools including popular issue tracking systems, collaboration platforms, and project management tools, enabling easy integration into existing development workflows.

In summary, AWS Device Farm and Sauce Labs offer powerful cloud-based testing services, each with its own set of unique features and strengths. While AWS Device Farm is particularly suited for native and hybrid mobile app testing with extensive device support, Sauce Labs provides broader coverage for both web and mobile app testing and offers advanced scalability and reporting capabilities. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the specific requirements of the project and the testing needs of the organization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Sauce Labs, AWS Device Farm

Rinchin
Rinchin

Jul 20, 2020

Needs adviceonSeleniumSeleniumSauce LabsSauce Labs

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

217k views217k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
AWS Device Farm
AWS Device Farm

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Run tests across a large selection of physical devices in parallel from various manufacturers with varying hardware, OS versions and form factors.

700+ browser/OS/device combinations for cross-browser and platform testing to improve web and mobile app quality and eliminate the overhead of internal infrastructure; Highly reliable, on-demand cloud for enterprise-grade scalability and industry standard security; Optimized for popular testing frameworks, CI systems, and surrounding tools and services; Works with Selenium and Appium based on industry standard Selenium WebDriver protocol. Compatible with existing tests in any popular language and testing framework; Identify test failures quickly with debugging tools like screenshots, video recordings, and detailed logs
Test on the same devices your customers use; Fix issues faster and delight your users; Simulate real-world environments; Choose the tests that work for you; Integrate with your development workflow; Test with confidence;
Statistics
Stacks
314
Stacks
74
Followers
435
Followers
180
Votes
439
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 60
    Selenium-compatible
  • 46
    Webdriver compatible
  • 35
    Video recordings of every test
  • 31
    Qa
  • 29
    Mobile support
Cons
  • 2
    Expensive
  • 2
    Relatively slow
Pros
  • 3
    1000 free minutes
  • 2
    Pay as you go pricing
Cons
  • 1
    You need to remember to turn airplane mode off
  • 1
    Records all sessions, blocks on processing when done
Integrations
CircleCI
CircleCI
Travis CI
Travis CI
Appium
Appium
Jenkins
Jenkins
Selenium
Selenium
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
AWS Cloud9
AWS Cloud9
TeamCity
TeamCity
Applitools
Applitools
Bamboo
Bamboo
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Sauce Labs, AWS Device Farm?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

k6

k6

It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

Locust

Locust

Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp