Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AWS Firecracker

6
34
+ 1
0
Docker

159.4K
123.4K
+ 1
3.8K
Add tool
Decisions about AWS Firecracker and Docker
Florian Sager
IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH · | 2 upvotes · 334.8K views
Chose
LXDLXD
over
DockerDocker

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of AWS Firecracker
Pros of Docker
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 824
      Rapid integration and build up
    • 690
      Isolation
    • 520
      Open source
    • 505
      Testa­bil­i­ty and re­pro­ducibil­i­ty
    • 459
      Lightweight
    • 217
      Standardization
    • 184
      Scalable
    • 105
      Upgrading / down­grad­ing / ap­pli­ca­tion versions
    • 87
      Security
    • 84
      Private paas environments
    • 33
      Portability
    • 25
      Limit resource usage
    • 16
      Game changer
    • 15
      I love the way docker has changed virtualization
    • 13
      Fast
    • 11
      Concurrency
    • 7
      Docker's Compose tools
    • 5
      Easy setup
    • 5
      Fast and Portable
    • 4
      Because its fun
    • 3
      Makes shipping to production very simple
    • 2
      It's dope
    • 2
      Highly useful
    • 1
      HIgh Throughput
    • 1
      Very easy to setup integrate and build
    • 1
      Package the environment with the application
    • 1
      Does a nice job hogging memory
    • 1
      Open source and highly configurable
    • 1
      Simplicity, isolation, resource effective
    • 1
      MacOS support FAKE
    • 1
      Its cool
    • 1
      Docker hub for the FTW
    • 1
      Super

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of AWS Firecracker
    Cons of Docker
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 8
        New versions == broken features
      • 6
        Unreliable networking
      • 6
        Documentation not always in sync
      • 4
        Moves quickly
      • 3
        Not Secure

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is AWS Firecracker?

      Firecracker is an open source virtualization technology that is purpose-built for creating and managing secure, multi-tenant container and function-based services that provide serverless operational models. Firecracker runs workloads in lightweight virtual machines, called microVMs, which combine the security and isolation properties provided by hardware virtualization technology with the speed and flexibility of containers.

      What is Docker?

      The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      Jobs that mention AWS Firecracker and Docker as a desired skillset
      Pinterest
      San Francisco, CA, US; , CA, US
      CBRE
      United States of America Texas Richardson
      CBRE
      United States of America Texas Richardson
      CBRE
      United States of America Texas Richardson
      LaunchDarkly
      Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
      What companies use AWS Firecracker?
      What companies use Docker?
      See which teams inside your own company are using AWS Firecracker or Docker.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with AWS Firecracker?
      What tools integrate with Docker?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      PythonDockerKubernetes+7
      3
      788
      PythonDockerKubernetes+14
      11
      2325
      Jul 9 2019 at 7:22PM

      Blue Medora

      DockerPostgreSQLNew Relic+8
      11
      2014
      DockerAmazon EC2Scala+8
      6
      2357
      GitHubDockerReact+17
      35
      34345
      What are some alternatives to AWS Firecracker and Docker?
      Kubernetes
      Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
      AWS Lambda
      AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.
      Serverless
      Build applications comprised of microservices that run in response to events, auto-scale for you, and only charge you when they run. This lowers the total cost of maintaining your apps, enabling you to build more logic, faster. The Framework uses new event-driven compute services, like AWS Lambda, Google CloudFunctions, and more.
      Azure Functions
      Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in virtually any Azure or 3rd party service as well as on-premises systems.
      Google Cloud Functions
      Construct applications from bite-sized business logic billed to the nearest 100 milliseconds, only while your code is running
      See all alternatives