Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AWS Glue vs Mule: What are the differences?
Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between AWS Glue and Mule, highlighting the key differences between the two.
Integration Capabilities: AWS Glue primarily focuses on data integration and ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) processes. It provides automatic schema discovery and schema evolution capabilities, making it easier to work with various data sources. On the other hand, Mule is a comprehensive integration platform that supports multiple integration patterns, such as APIs, files, databases, and messaging systems. It offers a wide range of connectors and transformations for seamless connectivity and data transformation.
Deployment and Scalability: AWS Glue is a fully managed service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS). It automatically scales resources based on the workload and user requirements. It also integrates well with other AWS services, allowing for seamless deployment and scalability. Mule, on the other hand, can be deployed on-premises, in the cloud, or in a hybrid model. It offers high scalability and flexibility to handle various deployment scenarios.
Data Processing and Transformation: AWS Glue offers an ETL-based approach for data processing and transformation. It provides a visual interface for creating and managing ETL workflows, allowing users to build complex data transformation pipelines easily. Mule, on the other hand, offers a powerful integration engine that supports both batch and real-time data processing. It provides a visual flow designer for building integration workflows with drag-and-drop capabilities.
Connectivity and Integration: AWS Glue supports various data sources, including AWS services like Amazon S3, Amazon RDS, Amazon DynamoDB, and more. It also integrates well with external databases, data warehouses, and on-premises systems. Mule, on the other hand, provides a wide range of connectors and adapters to connect with different systems, protocols, and databases. It offers comprehensive connectivity options for integrating with various enterprise systems.
Pricing and Cost: AWS Glue pricing is based on factors like data processing units, data catalog storage, and data transformation rates. The cost is primarily determined by the amount of data processed and the resources utilized. Mule pricing, on the other hand, is based on the deployment model and the number of cores or instances used. It offers different licensing options, including subscription-based and perpetual licenses.
Supported Use Cases: AWS Glue is mainly suited for organizations that require data integration, ETL processes, and schema evolution capabilities. It is widely used for data warehousing, data lakes, and analytics solutions. Mule, on the other hand, is suitable for organizations that need a comprehensive integration platform for building APIs, connecting applications, and orchestrating complex workflows. It is commonly used for API-led connectivity, hybrid integration, and digital transformation initiatives.
In Summary, AWS Glue primarily focuses on data integration and ETL processes, while Mule is a comprehensive integration platform that supports multiple integration patterns. AWS Glue is a fully managed service provided by AWS, while Mule offers deployment flexibility. They differ in the approach to data processing and transformation, connectivity options, pricing models, and supported use cases.
We need to perform ETL from several databases into a data warehouse or data lake. We want to
- keep raw and transformed data available to users to draft their own queries efficiently
- give users the ability to give custom permissions and SSO
- move between open-source on-premises development and cloud-based production environments
We want to use inexpensive Amazon EC2 instances only on medium-sized data set 16GB to 32GB feeding into Tableau Server or PowerBI for reporting and data analysis purposes.
You could also use AWS Lambda and use Cloudwatch event schedule if you know when the function should be triggered. The benefit is that you could use any language and use the respective database client.
But if you orchestrate ETLs then it makes sense to use Apache Airflow. This requires Python knowledge.
Though we have always built something custom, Apache airflow (https://airflow.apache.org/) stood out as a key contender/alternative when it comes to open sources. On the commercial offering, Amazon Redshift combined with Amazon Kinesis (for complex manipulations) is great for BI, though Redshift as such is expensive.
You may want to look into a Data Virtualization product called Conduit. It connects to disparate data sources in AWS, on prem, Azure, GCP, and exposes them as a single unified Spark SQL view to PowerBI (direct query) or Tableau. Allows auto query and caching policies to enhance query speeds and experience. Has a GPU query engine and optimized Spark for fallback. Can be deployed on your AWS VM or on prem, scales up and out. Sounds like the ideal solution to your needs.
I have to collect different data from multiple sources and store them in a single cloud location. Then perform cleaning and transforming using PySpark, and push the end results to other applications like reporting tools, etc. What would be the best solution? I can only think of Azure Data Factory + Databricks. Are there any alternatives to #AWS services + Databricks?
Hi all,
Currently, we need to ingest the data from Amazon S3 to DB either Amazon Athena or Amazon Redshift. But the problem with the data is, it is in .PSV (pipe separated values) format and the size is also above 200 GB. The query performance of the timeout in Athena/Redshift is not up to the mark, too slow while compared to Google BigQuery. How would I optimize the performance and query result time? Can anyone please help me out?
you can use aws glue service to convert you pipe format data to parquet format , and thus you can achieve data compression . Now you should choose Redshift to copy your data as it is very huge. To manage your data, you should partition your data in S3 bucket and also divide your data across the redshift cluster
First of all you should make your choice upon Redshift or Athena based on your use case since they are two very diferent services - Redshift is an enterprise-grade MPP Data Warehouse while Athena is a SQL layer on top of S3 with limited performance. If performance is a key factor, users are going to execute unpredictable queries and direct and managing costs are not a problem I'd definitely go for Redshift. If performance is not so critical and queries will be predictable somewhat I'd go for Athena.
Once you select the technology you'll need to optimize your data in order to get the queries executed as fast as possible. In both cases you may need to adapt the data model to fit your queries better. In the case you go for Athena you'd also proabably need to change your file format to Parquet or Avro and review your partition strategy depending on your most frequent type of query. If you choose Redshift you'll need to ingest the data from your files into it and maybe carry out some tuning tasks for performance gain.
I'll recommend Redshift for now since it can address a wider range of use cases, but we could give you better advice if you described your use case in depth.
It depend of the nature of your data (structured or not?) and of course your queries (ad-hoc or predictible?). For example you can look at partitioning and columnar format to maximize MPP capabilities for both Athena and Redshift
you can change your PSV fomat data to parquet file format with AWS GLUE and then your query performance will be improved
Pros of AWS Glue
- Managed Hive Metastore9
Pros of Mule runtime engine
- Open Source4
- Integration2
- Microservices2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
What is AWS Glue?
What is Mule runtime engine?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use AWS Glue?
What companies use Mule runtime engine?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with AWS Glue?
What tools integrate with Mule runtime engine?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+16