StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Serverless
  4. Serverless Task Processing
  5. AWS Lambda vs Serverless

AWS Lambda vs Serverless

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Stacks26.0K
Followers18.8K
Votes432
Serverless
Serverless
Stacks2.2K
Followers1.2K
Votes28
GitHub Stars46.9K
Forks5.7K

AWS Lambda vs Serverless: What are the differences?

AWS Lambda vs Serverless

AWS Lambda and Serverless are two cloud computing technologies that provide a serverless architecture for building and deploying applications. While both are commonly used for serverless application development, there are several key differences between them:

  1. Execution Model: AWS Lambda is a compute service that allows developers to run code without provisioning or managing servers. It executes the code in response to events, such as changes to data in an Amazon S3 bucket or a table in an Amazon DynamoDB database. On the other hand, Serverless, also known as Serverless Framework or Serverless Framework for AWS, is a framework that simplifies the deployment of serverless applications. It is not a compute service like Lambda, but rather a tool for managing and deploying serverless applications on AWS Lambda.

  2. Tooling and Ecosystem: AWS Lambda is a part of the larger Amazon Web Services ecosystem, which provides various services like storage, databases, messaging, etc. It has a comprehensive set of tools and services that work seamlessly with Lambda, making it easier to build and deploy applications using other AWS services. Serverless, on the other hand, is a framework that is designed to work specifically with AWS Lambda. It provides a set of tools and APIs to simplify the deployment and management of serverless applications, regardless of the specific AWS services being used.

  3. Language Support: AWS Lambda supports multiple programming languages, including Node.js, Java, C#, PowerShell, and Python. It allows developers to write functions in their preferred language and provides the necessary runtime environment to execute them. Serverless, on the other hand, is language agnostic and supports any programming language that can be executed in a Lambda function.

  4. Configuration and Management: AWS Lambda provides a web console and command-line interface (CLI) for configuring and managing Lambda functions. It allows developers to define various aspects of the Lambda function, such as the runtime, memory allocation, timeout, and triggers. Serverless, on the other hand, provides a declarative configuration file, usually written in YAML, for defining the infrastructure and resources required for a serverless application. It also provides a command-line interface (CLI) for deploying and managing serverless applications.

  5. Event Sources and Triggers: AWS Lambda supports a wide range of event sources and triggers that can invoke a Lambda function, such as API Gateway, S3, DynamoDB, CloudWatch Events, etc. It allows developers to create event-driven architectures by specifying the events that should trigger the function. Serverless, on the other hand, provides a simplified way of defining and configuring event sources and triggers using its framework. It abstracts the underlying AWS services and provides a consistent interface for defining events and triggers.

  6. Vendor Lock-in: AWS Lambda is a proprietary service provided by Amazon Web Services and is tightly integrated with its ecosystem of services. While it allows developers to build serverless applications that can run on other cloud platforms, it may require substantial modifications to make them compatible. Serverless, on the other hand, is an open-source framework and can be used with any cloud provider that supports AWS Lambda-like compute services. It provides a consistent deployment and management experience across different cloud platforms.

In summary, AWS Lambda is a compute service for running code in a serverless manner, while Serverless is a framework for managing and deploying serverless applications on AWS Lambda. AWS Lambda is part of the broader AWS ecosystem, supports multiple programming languages, and provides tools and services for configuring and managing Lambda functions. Serverless, on the other hand, is language agnostic, provides its own set of tools and APIs, and offers a simplified way of defining and managing serverless applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on AWS Lambda, Serverless

Tim
Tim

CTO at Checkly Inc.

Sep 18, 2019

Needs adviceonHerokuHerokuAWS LambdaAWS Lambda

When adding a new feature to Checkly rearchitecting some older piece, I tend to pick Heroku for rolling it out. But not always, because sometimes I pick AWS Lambda . The short story:

  • Developer Experience trumps everything.
  • AWS Lambda is cheap. Up to a limit though. This impact not only your wallet.
  • If you need geographic spread, AWS is lonely at the top.

The setup

Recently, I was doing a brainstorm at a startup here in Berlin on the future of their infrastructure. They were ready to move on from their initial, almost 100% Ec2 + Chef based setup. Everything was on the table. But we crossed out a lot quite quickly:

  • Pure, uncut, self hosted Kubernetes — way too much complexity
  • Managed Kubernetes in various flavors — still too much complexity
  • Zeit — Maybe, but no Docker support
  • Elastic Beanstalk — Maybe, bit old but does the job
  • Heroku
  • Lambda

It became clear a mix of PaaS and FaaS was the way to go. What a surprise! That is exactly what I use for Checkly! But when do you pick which model?

I chopped that question up into the following categories:

  • Developer Experience / DX 🤓
  • Ops Experience / OX 🐂 (?)
  • Cost 💵
  • Lock in 🔐

Read the full post linked below for all details

357k views357k
Comments
Mark
Mark

Nov 2, 2020

Needs adviceonMicrosoft AzureMicrosoft Azure

Need advice on what platform, systems and tools to use.

Evaluating whether to start a new digital business for which we will need to build a website that handles all traffic. Website only right now. May add smartphone apps later. No desktop app will ever be added. Website to serve various countries and languages. B2B and B2C type customers. Need to handle heavy traffic, be low cost, and scale well.

We are open to either build it on AWS or on Microsoft Azure.

Apologies if I'm leaving out some info. My first post. :) Thanks in advance!

133k views133k
Comments
Cory
Cory

Mar 28, 2021

Decided

Netlfiy Functions uses AWS Lambda under the hood, but Netlify adds some nice sugar. The biggest advantage is the local development experience with netlify-cli. This allows you to run your functions locally with local configuration or pull configs from the Netlify dashboard. I built a health-check endpoint in about 2 minutes, and my send-email function in less than an hour.

28.2k views28.2k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Serverless
Serverless

AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.

Build applications comprised of microservices that run in response to events, auto-scale for you, and only charge you when they run. This lowers the total cost of maintaining your apps, enabling you to build more logic, faster. The Framework uses new event-driven compute services, like AWS Lambda, Google CloudFunctions, and more.

Extend other AWS services with custom logic;Build custom back-end services;Completely Automated Administration;Built-in Fault Tolerance;Automatic Scaling;Integrated Security Model;Bring Your Own Code;Pay Per Use;Flexible Resource Model
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
46.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
5.7K
Stacks
26.0K
Stacks
2.2K
Followers
18.8K
Followers
1.2K
Votes
432
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 129
    No infrastructure
  • 83
    Cheap
  • 70
    Quick
  • 59
    Stateless
  • 47
    No deploy, no server, great sleep
Cons
  • 7
    Cant execute ruby or go
  • 3
    Compute time limited
  • 1
    Can't execute PHP w/o significant effort
Pros
  • 14
    API integration
  • 7
    Supports cloud functions for Google, Azure, and IBM
  • 3
    Lower cost
  • 1
    3. Simplified Management for developers to focus on cod
  • 1
    5. Built-in Redundancy and Availability:
Integrations
No integrations available
Azure Functions
Azure Functions
Amazon API Gateway
Amazon API Gateway

What are some alternatives to AWS Lambda, Serverless?

Azure Functions

Azure Functions

Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in virtually any Azure or 3rd party service as well as on-premises systems.

Google Cloud Run

Google Cloud Run

A managed compute platform that enables you to run stateless containers that are invocable via HTTP requests. It's serverless by abstracting away all infrastructure management.

Google Cloud Functions

Google Cloud Functions

Construct applications from bite-sized business logic billed to the nearest 100 milliseconds, only while your code is running

Knative

Knative

Knative provides a set of middleware components that are essential to build modern, source-centric, and container-based applications that can run anywhere: on premises, in the cloud, or even in a third-party data center

OpenFaaS

OpenFaaS

Serverless Functions Made Simple for Docker and Kubernetes

Nuclio

Nuclio

nuclio is portable across IoT devices, laptops, on-premises datacenters and cloud deployments, eliminating cloud lock-ins and enabling hybrid solutions.

Apache OpenWhisk

Apache OpenWhisk

OpenWhisk is an open source serverless platform. It is enterprise grade and accessible to all developers thanks to its superior programming model and tooling. It powers IBM Cloud Functions, Adobe I/O Runtime, Naver, Nimbella among others.

Cloud Functions for Firebase

Cloud Functions for Firebase

Cloud Functions for Firebase lets you create functions that are triggered by Firebase products, such as changes to data in the Realtime Database, uploads to Cloud Storage, new user sign ups via Authentication, and conversion events in Analytics.

AWS Batch

AWS Batch

It enables developers, scientists, and engineers to easily and efficiently run hundreds of thousands of batch computing jobs on AWS. It dynamically provisions the optimal quantity and type of compute resources (e.g., CPU or memory optimized instances) based on the volume and specific resource requirements of the batch jobs submitted.

Fission

Fission

Write short-lived functions in any language, and map them to HTTP requests (or other event triggers). Deploy functions instantly with one command. There are no containers to build, and no Docker registries to manage.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase