StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Server Configuration And Automation
  5. AWX vs Runcloud vs Salt

AWX vs Runcloud vs Salt

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Salt
Salt
Stacks410
Followers449
Votes165
GitHub Stars14.9K
Forks5.6K
AWX
AWX
Stacks138
Followers259
Votes1
GitHub Stars15.0K
Forks3.6K
Runcloud
Runcloud
Stacks25
Followers69
Votes0

AWX vs Runcloud vs Salt: What are the differences?

Introduction:

1. Key Differences between AWX and Runcloud and Salt:

1. Target Audience: AWX is targeted towards enterprise-level organizations that require extensive automation capabilities, while Runcloud is more suited for individual developers and small to medium-sized businesses. Salt, on the other hand, is designed for scalability and managing large, complex infrastructures.

2. Architecture: AWX is built on top of Ansible and provides a web-based user interface for managing Ansible playbooks and inventories. Runcloud is a cloud server management tool that allows users to easily deploy web applications. Salt follows a master-minion architecture where the master server controls multiple minions for configuration management.

3. Scalability: AWX is scalable and can handle a large number of hosts and complex automation tasks due to its robust architecture. Runcloud is suitable for managing a smaller number of servers and may not be as scalable as AWX. Salt is known for its scalability and ability to handle thousands of minions in a distributed environment.

4. Cost: AWX is an open-source project with no licensing costs, making it a cost-effective solution for organizations. Runcloud offers different pricing tiers based on the number of servers being managed. Salt is also open-source, but there might be costs associated with enterprise support and additional features.

5. Integration: AWX seamlessly integrates with Ansible for automation and configuration management tasks. Runcloud integrates with popular cloud providers and services for easy deployment and management. Salt integrates well with various cloud platforms and third-party tools for enhanced functionality.

6. Community Support: AWX benefits from a large open-source community contributing to its development and providing support through forums and documentation. Runcloud and Salt also have strong communities that offer resources and assistance for users navigating the platforms.

In Summary, AWX, Runcloud, and Salt differ in their target audience, architecture, scalability, cost, integration capabilities, and community support, catering to different needs in automation, cloud server management, and configuration management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Salt
Salt
AWX
AWX
Runcloud
Runcloud

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

AWX provides a web-based user interface, REST API, and task engine built on top of Ansible. It is the upstream project for Tower, a commercial derivative of AWX. Ansible Towers powers enterprise automation by adding control, security and delegation capabilities to Ansible environments.

SaaS based PHP cloud server control panel. Support Digital Ocean, Linode, AWS, Vultr, Azure and other custom VPS. GIT deployment webhook and easiest control panel to manage Laravel, Cake, Symphony or WordPress.

Remote execution is the core function of Salt. Running pre-defined or arbitrary commands on remote hosts.;Salt modules are the core of remote execution. They provide functionality such as installing packages, restarting a service, running a remote command, transferring files, and infinitely more;Building on the remote execution core is a robust and flexible configuration management framework. Execution happens on the minions allowing effortless, simultaneous configuration of tens of thousands of hosts.
-
Automate server configuration and security updates; Reliable storage to bring you peace of mind; Powerful use of git deployment for ZERO downtime guaranteed; Grant privileges for trusted users to manage your server
Statistics
GitHub Stars
14.9K
GitHub Stars
15.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.6K
GitHub Forks
3.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
410
Stacks
138
Stacks
25
Followers
449
Followers
259
Followers
69
Votes
165
Votes
1
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 47
    Flexible
  • 30
    Easy
  • 27
    Remote execution
  • 24
    Enormously flexible
  • 12
    Great plugin API
Cons
  • 1
    Bloated
  • 1
    No immutable infrastructure
  • 1
    Dangerous
Pros
  • 1
    Open source
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Ansible
Ansible
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
PHP
PHP
Git
Git
Linode
Linode
Vultr
Vultr

What are some alternatives to Salt, AWX, Runcloud?

Ansible

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Chef

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Capistrano

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Fabric

Fabric

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

AWS OpsWorks

AWS OpsWorks

Start from templates for common technologies like Ruby, Node.JS, PHP, and Java, or build your own using Chef recipes to install software packages and perform any task that you can script. AWS OpsWorks can scale your application using automatic load-based or time-based scaling and maintain the health of your application by detecting failed instances and replacing them. You have full control of deployments and automation of each component

cPanel

cPanel

It is an industry leading hosting platform with world-class support. It is globally empowering hosting providers through fully-automated point-and-click hosting platform by hosting-centric professionals

Webmin

Webmin

It is a web-based interface for system administration for Unix. Using any modern web browser, you can setup user accounts, Apache, DNS, file sharing and much more. It removes the need to manually edit Unix configuration files.

Mina

Mina

Mina works really fast because it's a deploy Bash script generator. It generates an entire procedure as a Bash script and runs it remotely in the server. Compare this to the likes of Vlad or Capistrano, where each command is run separately on their own SSH sessions. Mina only creates one SSH session per deploy, minimizing the SSH connection overhead.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana