StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Server Configuration And Automation
  5. AWX vs Rundeck

AWX vs Rundeck

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Rundeck
Rundeck
Stacks204
Followers343
Votes7
AWX
AWX
Stacks138
Followers259
Votes1
GitHub Stars15.0K
Forks3.6K

AWX vs Rundeck: What are the differences?

Introduction:

AWX and Rundeck are both popular open-source automation tools used for managing and orchestrating IT infrastructure. While both tools serve similar purposes, there are key differences that set them apart from each other. In this markdown, we will discuss the key differences between AWX and Rundeck in a concise manner.

  1. Architecture: AWX is built on top of Ansible and utilizes the power of Ansible playbooks for automation. On the other hand, Rundeck follows a plugin-based architecture, providing more flexibility in terms of integration with different tools and technologies.

  2. User Interface: AWX offers a web-based user interface that is designed around Ansible workflows and supports various features such as job scheduling, inventory management, and access control. Rundeck also provides a web-based user interface but focuses more on task and job management, providing a clean and intuitive interface for managing workflows and executions.

  3. Community Support and Maturity: AWX benefits from being a part of the Ansible ecosystem and has a vibrant and active community. It is well-established and widely used in production environments. Rundeck, on the other hand, has been around for a longer time and has a larger user base with extensive community support. It has also been adopted by many enterprise organizations.

  4. Integration Capabilities: AWX integrates seamlessly with Ansible and can utilize the vast collection of existing Ansible modules and playbooks. It is well-suited for environments with a heavy focus on Ansible-driven automation. Rundeck, on the contrary, supports integration with a wide range of tools and technologies beyond just Ansible, making it a versatile choice for orchestrating heterogeneous environments.

  5. Scalability and Performance: AWX is known for its scalability, allowing the management of large-scale infrastructures with thousands of nodes. It can handle concurrent job executions efficiently. Rundeck also offers good performance and scalability, albeit with a slightly lower threshold compared to AWX. The choice between the two would depend on the specific scale requirements of the infrastructure.

  6. Community-driven vs Enterprise Support: AWX, being a community-driven project, primarily relies on community support for bug fixes and feature enhancements. However, Red Hat offers commercial support for AWX under their Ansible Automation Platform. Rundeck, on the other hand, provides enterprise support directly from the developers, offering dedicated assistance for any issues faced during usage.

In Summary, AWX and Rundeck differ in their architecture, user interface, community support, integration capabilities, scalability, and support options, making them suitable for different use cases and environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Rundeck
Rundeck
AWX
AWX

A self-service operations platform used for support tasks, enterprise job scheduling, deployment, and more.

AWX provides a web-based user interface, REST API, and task engine built on top of Ansible. It is the upstream project for Tower, a commercial derivative of AWX. Ansible Towers powers enterprise automation by adding control, security and delegation capabilities to Ansible environments.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
15.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.6K
Stacks
204
Stacks
138
Followers
343
Followers
259
Votes
7
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to understand
  • 3
    Role based access control
  • 1
    Doesn't need containers
Pros
  • 1
    Open source
Integrations
Ansible
Ansible
Jenkins
Jenkins
Ansible
Ansible

What are some alternatives to Rundeck, AWX?

Ansible

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Chef

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Capistrano

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Salt

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Fabric

Fabric

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

AWS OpsWorks

AWS OpsWorks

Start from templates for common technologies like Ruby, Node.JS, PHP, and Java, or build your own using Chef recipes to install software packages and perform any task that you can script. AWS OpsWorks can scale your application using automatic load-based or time-based scaling and maintain the health of your application by detecting failed instances and replacing them. You have full control of deployments and automation of each component

cPanel

cPanel

It is an industry leading hosting platform with world-class support. It is globally empowering hosting providers through fully-automated point-and-click hosting platform by hosting-centric professionals

Webmin

Webmin

It is a web-based interface for system administration for Unix. Using any modern web browser, you can setup user accounts, Apache, DNS, file sharing and much more. It removes the need to manually edit Unix configuration files.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana