Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Underscore vs axios: What are the differences?
Underscore is a utility library for JavaScript that provides a wide range of functions to facilitate common programming tasks. Axios is a promise-based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Below are the key differences between Underscore and Axios.
1. **Functionality**:
Underscore primarily focuses on providing utility functions for manipulating arrays, objects, and functions, while Axios specializes in making HTTP requests using promises.
2. **Dependencies**:
Underscore has no dependencies and can be used independently in projects, whereas Axios requires the use of a Promise polyfill for older browsers.
3. **Common Usage**:
Underscore is commonly used for tasks like filtering data, mapping arrays, and handling collections, while axios is utilized for sending HTTP requests, handling responses, and managing API interactions.
4. **Browser Compatibility**:
Underscore is designed to work across different browsers and environments without any compatibility issues, while Axios is specifically optimized for making HTTP requests in the browser and Node.js.
5. **Type of Library**:
Underscore is more of a general-purpose utility library that covers a wide range of programming tasks, while Axios is focused solely on facilitating HTTP communications.
6. **Asynchronous Operations**:
Axios simplifies handling asynchronous operations by using promises, allowing for cleaner and more organized code compared to Underscore, which deals more with synchronous operations.
In Summary, Underscore is a general-purpose utility library, whereas Axios specializes in making HTTP requests using promises, providing a more focused approach for handling API interactions.
Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) provides standard data objects in JSON format for the healthcare industry. Since JSON objects are hierarchical and tree-like, we had a need to defensively 'pluck' fields from our JSON objects and do lots of mapping. We tried jQuery and Underscore and a few other technologies like FHIRPath; but Lodash has been the most well supported, works in the most contexts, has the cleanest syntax, etc. We particularly like the ES6 version of Lodash, where we can import
the method names directly, without resorting to * or _ syntax. We got hooked on the 'get' function to defensively pluck fields from objects without crashing our user interface, and have found countless uses for the other lodash functions throughout our apps.
Lodash is great for developing and optimizing algorithms.
Pros of axios
Pros of Underscore
- Utility85
- Simple55
- Functional programming40
- Fast32
- Open source28
- Backbone20
- Javascript16
- Annotated source code8
- Library6