StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Javascript Testing Framework
  5. Baretest vs Protractor

Baretest vs Protractor

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Protractor
Protractor
Stacks2.2K
Followers543
Votes33
GitHub Stars8.7K
Forks2.3K
Baretest
Baretest
Stacks1
Followers9
Votes3
GitHub Stars424
Forks15

Baretest vs Protractor: What are the differences?

## Key Differences Between Baretest and Protractor

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Testing Approach**: Baretest is a lightweight testing framework focused on simplicity and performance, while Protractor is a specialized testing framework designed specifically for testing AngularJS applications.
2. **Programming Language**: Baretest uses JavaScript for writing test cases, allowing for flexible and familiar syntax, whereas Protractor uses TypeScript, a superset of JavaScript that adds static typing capabilities.
3. **API Integrations**: Baretest offers minimal built-in APIs, requiring users to rely on external libraries for additional functionalities, while Protractor provides a rich set of APIs tailored to AngularJS applications, simplifying test automation tasks.
4. **Browser Support**: Baretest is browser-agnostic, making it suitable for testing various browsers without constraints, while Protractor is optimized for testing applications on the Chrome browser, offering seamless integration and performance.
5. **Asynchronous Testing**: Baretest requires explicit handling of asynchronous tasks using native JavaScript constructs, whereas Protractor simplifies asynchronous testing through the use of WebDriver promises, enhancing test readability and maintenance.
6. **Community and Support**: Protractor enjoys a larger community and comprehensive support resources due to its association with the AngularJS ecosystem, offering users a wealth of knowledge and troubleshooting options.

In Summary, Baretest and Protractor differ in testing approach, programming language, API integrations, browser support, asynchronous testing, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Protractor, Baretest

Yildiz
Yildiz

testmanager/automation tester at medicalservice

May 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSTypeScriptTypeScriptCypressCypress

In the company I will be building test automation framework and my new company develops apps mainly using AngularJS/TypeScript. I was planning to build Protractor-Jasmine framework but a friend of mine told me about Cypress and heard that its users are very satisfied with it. I am trying to understand the capabilities of Cypress and as the final goal to differentiate these two tools. Can anyone advice me on this in a nutshell pls...

277k views277k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Protractor
Protractor
Baretest
Baretest

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

It is a fast and simple JavaScript test runner. It offers near-instant performance and a brainless API. It makes testing tolerable.

Test Like a User; For Angular Apps; Automatic Waiting
Fast and simple JavaScript test runner; Tiny footprint; Near-instant performance
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.7K
GitHub Stars
424
GitHub Forks
2.3K
GitHub Forks
15
Stacks
2.2K
Stacks
1
Followers
543
Followers
9
Votes
33
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Easy setup
  • 8
    Quick tests implementation
  • 6
    Flexible
  • 5
    Open source
  • 5
    Promise support
Cons
  • 4
    Limited
Pros
  • 1
    Small
  • 1
    Simplicity
  • 1
    Speed
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
Angular
Angular
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Protractor, Baretest?

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

CodeceptJS

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

AVA

AVA

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

QUnit

QUnit

QUnit is a powerful, easy-to-use JavaScript unit testing framework. It's used by the jQuery, jQuery UI and jQuery Mobile projects and is capable of testing any generic JavaScript code, including itself!

Sorry-cypress

Sorry-cypress

Open-source, self-hosted alternative Cypress Dashboard.

SinonJS

SinonJS

It is a really helpful library when you want to unit test your code. It supports spies, stubs, and mocks. The library has cross browser support and also can run on the server using Node.js.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana