Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Bazel

301
568
+ 1
133
SCons

5
14
+ 1
0
Add tool

Bazel vs SCons: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of software development, build systems play a crucial role in automating the process of converting source code into executable software. Two popular build systems used in the industry are Bazel and SCons. While they both serve the same purpose, there are key differences between them that make each suitable for different use cases.

  1. Language Support: Bazel focuses on providing extensive language support, including but not limited to Java, C++, Python, and Go. On the other hand, SCons offers a more limited set of programming languages, with support for C, C++, and Python out of the box. However, SCons can be extended to support additional languages with custom builders.

  2. Dependency Handling: Bazel's dependency management is based on a concept called "build graphs" which allows for efficient and parallel building of only the necessary dependencies. It uses a fine-grained analysis of the code to determine the minimal set of dependencies needed for a particular build. In contrast, SCons follows a more simplistic approach where the dependencies are explicitly defined and managed by the user.

  3. Scalability and Performance: Bazel is known for its high scalability and performance, particularly in large codebases. It can handle builds with thousands of targets and millions of lines of code efficiently by leveraging distributed caching and parallelism. SCons, while being a reliable build system, might struggle with large codebases, leading to slower build times.

  4. Build Configuration: Bazel adopts a declarative configuration approach, where the build rules and dependencies are defined in a separate build file using a domain-specific language called Starlark. This allows for a clear separation between the build logic and the source code. On the other hand, SCons uses a more imperative configuration approach, where build rules and dependencies are defined within the build scripts themselves, making the build configuration tightly coupled with the source code.

  5. Build System Ecosystem: Bazel has gained popularity among large-scale software projects and is actively supported by Google, which develops it. It has a growing ecosystem and community support, along with an extensive set of build rules and tools. SCons, while being a mature build system, may have a smaller ecosystem in comparison, and the availability of specific tools or rules might vary depending on the language or framework being used.

  6. Platform Compatibility: Bazel supports various platforms, including Linux, macOS, and Windows, making it suitable for cross-platform development. SCons also offers cross-platform compatibility, but it may require additional configuration or customization, depending on the target platform and the specific dependencies.

In summary, Bazel provides extensive language support, efficient dependency handling, high scalability, declarative build configuration, a growing ecosystem, and excellent cross-platform compatibility. On the other hand, SCons offers a more limited set of language support, user-managed dependency handling, reliable performance, imperative build configuration, and platform compatibility. The choice between Bazel and SCons depends on the specific requirements and characteristics of the software project at hand.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Bazel
Pros of SCons
  • 28
    Fast
  • 20
    Deterministic incremental builds
  • 17
    Correct
  • 16
    Multi-language
  • 14
    Enforces declared inputs/outputs
  • 10
    High-level build language
  • 9
    Scalable
  • 5
    Multi-platform support
  • 5
    Sandboxing
  • 4
    Dependency management
  • 2
    Windows Support
  • 2
    Flexible
  • 1
    Android Studio integration
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Bazel
    Cons of SCons
    • 3
      No Windows Support
    • 2
      Bad IntelliJ support
    • 1
      Poor windows support for some languages
    • 1
      Constant breaking changes
    • 1
      Learning Curve
    • 1
      Lack of Documentation
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Bazel?

      Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

      What is SCons?

      It is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool. Think of it as an improved, cross-platform substitute for the classic Make utility with integrated functionality similar to autoconf/automake and compiler caches such as ccache. In short, it is an easier, more reliable and faster way to build software.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Bazel?
      What companies use SCons?
        No companies found
        See which teams inside your own company are using Bazel or SCons.
        Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with Bazel?
        What tools integrate with SCons?

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        Blog Posts

        Mar 24 2021 at 12:57PM

        Pinterest

        GitJenkinsKafka+7
        3
        2166
        GitJenkinsGroovy+4
        4
        2706
        What are some alternatives to Bazel and SCons?
        Pants
        Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.
        Webpack
        A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.
        Ansible
        Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.
        Buck
        Buck encourages the creation of small, reusable modules consisting of code and resources, and supports a variety of languages on many platforms.
        CMake
        It is used to control the software compilation process using simple platform and compiler independent configuration files, and generate native makefiles and workspaces that can be used in the compiler environment of the user's choice.
        See all alternatives