StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Bitbucket Pipelines vs Envoyer

Bitbucket Pipelines vs Envoyer

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Envoyer
Envoyer
Stacks58
Followers80
Votes3
Bitbucket Pipelines
Bitbucket Pipelines
Stacks350
Followers368
Votes0

Bitbucket Pipelines vs Envoyer: What are the differences?

  1. Hosted vs Self-hosted: One key difference between Bitbucket Pipelines and Envoyer is that Bitbucket Pipelines is a hosted continuous integration and delivery service provided by Bitbucket, while Envoyer is a self-hosted deployment tool that needs to be set up on your own servers.

  2. Focus on CI/CD vs Deployment: Bitbucket Pipelines primarily focuses on continuous integration and continuous delivery, providing automated build and testing processes for your code. On the other hand, Envoyer is specifically designed for facilitating smooth and efficient deployments of your applications to various servers.

  3. Integration with version control system: Bitbucket Pipelines is deeply integrated with Bitbucket repositories, allowing seamless automation of the CI/CD process directly from your version control system. Envoyer, in contrast, can be integrated with various version control systems like Git, GitHub, and Bitbucket.

  4. User Interface: Bitbucket Pipelines offers a user-friendly interface within the Bitbucket platform, making it easy for developers to set up and manage their CI/CD pipelines. Envoyer provides a clean and intuitive web interface for deploying code to servers, with features like zero-downtime deployment and server health monitoring.

  5. Scalability: Bitbucket Pipelines is a scalable solution that can adapt to the needs of small teams to large enterprises, offering flexibility in setting up pipelines and handling different stages of the software development lifecycle. Envoyer, being a deployment-focused tool, is also scalable but may require additional setup for managing deployments across a larger infrastructure.

  6. Cost: Bitbucket Pipelines is a subscription-based service with pricing plans based on the number of build minutes consumed, while Envoyer offers a one-time payment model with pricing tiers based on the number of servers you need to deploy to. This difference in pricing models can affect the cost-effectiveness for teams based on their specific deployment needs.

In Summary, the key differences between Bitbucket Pipelines and Envoyer lie in their hosting type, focus, integration with version control systems, user interface, scalability, and pricing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Envoyer
Envoyer
Bitbucket Pipelines
Bitbucket Pipelines

Envoyer deploys your PHP applications with zero downtime. Just push your code, and let Envoyer deliver your application to one or many servers without interrupting a single customer. In this series, we'll discuss each feature of Envoyer, demonstrating how to use them with a sample project.

It is an Integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment for Bitbucket Cloud that's trivial to set up, automating your code from test to production. Our mission is to enable all teams to ship software faster by driving the practice of continuous delivery.

GitHub / Bitbucket Integration;Seamless Deployment Rollbacks;Deploy To Multiple Servers;Easy Environment Syncing;Application Health Checks;Cron Job Monitoring;Integrated Chat Notifications;Deploy Any PHP Project;Unlimited Team Members;Unlimited Deployments;Customize Your Deployments;Tuned For Laravel
Continuous integration and delivery; Map the branch structure; Run as service; Extend your workflow; Go multilingual with Docker; Use environment Variables; Skip the queue;
Statistics
Stacks
58
Stacks
350
Followers
80
Followers
368
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to use
No community feedback yet
Integrations
PHP
PHP
Laravel
Laravel
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
HipChat
HipChat
Slack
Slack
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Envoyer, Bitbucket Pipelines?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot