Home
DevOps
Build, Test, Deploy
Continuous Integration

Bitbucket Pipelines vs Envoyer

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Bitbucket Pipelines
345
363
+ 1
0
Envoyer
58
80
+ 1
3
Add tool

Bitbucket Pipelines vs Envoyer: What are the differences?

  1. Hosted vs Self-hosted: One key difference between Bitbucket Pipelines and Envoyer is that Bitbucket Pipelines is a hosted continuous integration and delivery service provided by Bitbucket, while Envoyer is a self-hosted deployment tool that needs to be set up on your own servers.

  2. Focus on CI/CD vs Deployment: Bitbucket Pipelines primarily focuses on continuous integration and continuous delivery, providing automated build and testing processes for your code. On the other hand, Envoyer is specifically designed for facilitating smooth and efficient deployments of your applications to various servers.

  3. Integration with version control system: Bitbucket Pipelines is deeply integrated with Bitbucket repositories, allowing seamless automation of the CI/CD process directly from your version control system. Envoyer, in contrast, can be integrated with various version control systems like Git, GitHub, and Bitbucket.

  4. User Interface: Bitbucket Pipelines offers a user-friendly interface within the Bitbucket platform, making it easy for developers to set up and manage their CI/CD pipelines. Envoyer provides a clean and intuitive web interface for deploying code to servers, with features like zero-downtime deployment and server health monitoring.

  5. Scalability: Bitbucket Pipelines is a scalable solution that can adapt to the needs of small teams to large enterprises, offering flexibility in setting up pipelines and handling different stages of the software development lifecycle. Envoyer, being a deployment-focused tool, is also scalable but may require additional setup for managing deployments across a larger infrastructure.

  6. Cost: Bitbucket Pipelines is a subscription-based service with pricing plans based on the number of build minutes consumed, while Envoyer offers a one-time payment model with pricing tiers based on the number of servers you need to deploy to. This difference in pricing models can affect the cost-effectiveness for teams based on their specific deployment needs.

In Summary, the key differences between Bitbucket Pipelines and Envoyer lie in their hosting type, focus, integration with version control systems, user interface, scalability, and pricing model.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Bitbucket Pipelines
Pros of Envoyer
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 3
      Easy to use

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    What is Bitbucket Pipelines?

    It is an Integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment for Bitbucket Cloud that's trivial to set up, automating your code from test to production. Our mission is to enable all teams to ship software faster by driving the practice of continuous delivery.

    What is Envoyer?

    Envoyer deploys your PHP applications with zero downtime. Just push your code, and let Envoyer deliver your application to one or many servers without interrupting a single customer. In this series, we'll discuss each feature of Envoyer, demonstrating how to use them with a sample project.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention Bitbucket Pipelines and Envoyer as a desired skillset
    Platform Engineer
    LaunchDarkly
    - US
    View Job Details
    EscapeGoogleBud+11
    What companies use Bitbucket Pipelines?
    What companies use Envoyer?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Bitbucket Pipelines or Envoyer.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Bitbucket Pipelines?
    What tools integrate with Envoyer?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Bitbucket Pipelines and Envoyer?
    Jenkins
    In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
    CircleCI
    Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.
    GitLab
    GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
    GitLab CI
    GitLab offers a continuous integration service. If you add a .gitlab-ci.yml file to the root directory of your repository, and configure your GitLab project to use a Runner, then each merge request or push triggers your CI pipeline.
    Bamboo
    Focus on coding and count on Bamboo as your CI and build server! Create multi-stage build plans, set up triggers to start builds upon commits, and assign agents to your critical builds and deployments.
    See all alternatives

    Related Comparisons

    Envoyer vs Heroku vs NinefoldEnvoyer vs Red Hat OpenShiftEnvoyer vs Google App EngineCloudBees vs EnvoyerAppFog vs Envoyer

    Trending Comparisons

    Django vs Laravel vs Node.jsBootstrap vs Foundation vs Material-UINode.js vs Spring BootFlyway vs LiquibaseAWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

    Top Comparisons

    Bootstrap vs MaterializeHipChat vs Mattermost vs SlackBitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLabPostman vs Swagger UI