Play vs. Phalcon vs. Blade

  • 717
  • 273
  • 0
  • 199
  • 799
  • 1.83K
  • -
  • -
  • 2.56K

What is Play?

Play Framework makes it easy to build web applications with Java & Scala. Play is based on a lightweight, stateless, web-friendly architecture. Built on Akka, Play provides predictable and minimal resource consumption (CPU, memory, threads) for highly-scalable applications.

What is Phalcon?

Phalcon is a web framework implemented as a C extension offering high performance and lower resource consumption.

What is Blade?

Blade is a lightweight MVC framework. It is based on the principles of simplicity and elegance.
Why do developers choose Play?
Why do you like Play?

Why do developers choose Phalcon?
Why do you like Phalcon?

Why do developers choose Blade?
Why do you like Blade?

What are the cons of using Play?
Downsides of Play?

What are the cons of using Phalcon?
Downsides of Phalcon?

What are the cons of using Blade?
No Cons submitted yet for Blade
Downsides of Blade?

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Play?
138 companies on StackShare use Play
What companies use Phalcon?
31 companies on StackShare use Phalcon
What companies use Blade?
2 companies on StackShare use Blade
What tools integrate with Play?
1 tools on StackShare integrate with Play
What tools integrate with Phalcon?
2 tools on StackShare integrate with Phalcon
No integrations listed yet

What are some alternatives to Play, Phalcon, and Blade?

  • Node.js - Node.js is a platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications
  • Rails - Web development that doesn't hurt
  • Android SDK - The Android SDK provides you the API libraries and developer tools necessary to build, test, and debug apps for Android.
  • Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

See all alternatives to Play



Interest Over Time