Overview

Google App Maker

Stacks177

Followers237

Votes0

Blazor

Stacks552

Followers724

Votes445

Blazor vs Google App Maker: What are the differences?

Introduction: Blazor and Google App Maker are both tools for building web applications, but they have key differences that set them apart.

Framework vs Platform: Blazor is a framework developed by Microsoft that allows developers to build interactive web applications using C# and .NET, while Google App Maker is a low-code development platform that enables users to create custom business applications without the need for traditional coding.
Hosting: Blazor applications can be hosted on any server that supports .NET Core, while Google App Maker applications are hosted on Google Cloud Platform, which offers scalability and reliability but may require additional configuration.
Customization: Blazor provides greater flexibility for customization and extensibility through the use of C# and .NET libraries, allowing developers to create highly tailored applications, whereas Google App Maker offers a more user-friendly interface for creating applications quickly but with limited customization options.
Integration: Blazor seamlessly integrates with other .NET technologies and services, making it easy to connect with databases, APIs, and third-party tools, while Google App Maker is tightly integrated with Google services such as G Suite, Google Drive, and Google Cloud SQL.
Development Experience: With Blazor, developers have full control over the development process, including debugging and testing, using familiar tools like Visual Studio, whereas Google App Maker simplifies the development process by providing pre-built templates and drag-and-drop components for rapid application development.
Cost: While Blazor is free to use as an open-source framework, Google App Maker is part of G Suite's Enterprise plan, which comes with a subscription fee, making it a more costly option for businesses looking to build custom applications.

In Summary, Blazor and Google App Maker differ in terms of their underlying technology, hosting options, customization capabilities, integration with other services, development experience, and cost.

Detailed Comparison

Google App Maker	Blazor
App Maker lets you develop powerful apps with relative ease. Create a model to manage your data, build a UI in the visual editor, use Apps Script to write some scripts, and you're on your way.	Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.
-	Uses only the latest web standards; No plugins or transpilation needed; A component model for building composable UI; Routing; Layouts; Forms and validation; Dependency injection; JavaScript interop; Live reloading in the browser during development; Server-side rendering; Full .NET debugging both in browsers and in the IDE; Rich IntelliSense and tooling; Ability to run on older (non-WebAssembly) browsers via asm.js; Publishing and app size trimming
Statistics
Stacks 177	Stacks 552
Followers 237	Followers 724
Votes 0	Votes 445
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 63 Uses C# 49 No need to learn separate language or technology 42 Supports making a single page application 40 Tight integration with .NET project 38 Uses .NET standard library Cons 4 Initial load time 2 Hard to inject javascript
Integrations
G Suite Google Cloud SQL	.NET C# WebAssembly

What are some alternatives to Google App Maker, Blazor?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Stamplay

The API-based development platform enabling developers to do 80% of the job in 1% of the time thanks to: out of the box APIs for users and data, one-click integration with any API, scalable infrastructure and SDKs. Build Rome in a day.