Otto vs Vagrant vs boot2docker

Overview

Vagrant

Stacks11.9K

Followers7.8K

Votes1.5K

boot2docker

Stacks263

Followers211

Votes95

GitHub Stars8.3K

Forks1.3K

Otto

Stacks27

Followers86

Votes18

GitHub Stars4.2K

Forks214

Otto vs Vagrant vs boot2docker: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Resource Efficiency**: Otto uses HashiCorp's Packer, Terraform, and Consul under the hood, making it lightweight and efficient in resource usage compared to Vagrant and boot2docker.
   
2. **Provisioning Flexibility**: Unlike Vagrant, Otto provides built-in support for various provisioners like Ansible, Chef, and Puppet, offering more flexibility in configuring and managing environments.
   
3. **Containerization Support**: Otto focuses on orchestrating and managing containers using tools like Docker, making it more suitable for container-based development compared to Vagrant and boot2docker.
   
4. **Unified Workflow**: Otto offers a unified workflow for building, deploying, and managing applications, integrating various tools seamlessly, which might require separate setups in Vagrant and boot2docker.
   
5. **Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) Integration**: Otto comes with features that streamline CI/CD processes, enabling smoother automation compared to Vagrant and boot2docker, which may require additional configurations for CI/CD pipelines.
   
6. **Scalability**: Otto is built with scalability in mind, allowing easy scaling of environments and applications, making it more suitable for projects requiring scalability compared to Vagrant and boot2docker.

In Summary, Otto offers resource efficiency, provisioning flexibility, containerization support, a unified workflow, CI/CD integration, and scalability advantages over Vagrant and boot2docker.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Vagrant	boot2docker	Otto
Vagrant provides the framework and configuration format to create and manage complete portable development environments. These development environments can live on your computer or in the cloud, and are portable between Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux.	boot2docker is a lightweight Linux distribution based on Tiny Core Linux made specifically to run Docker containers. It runs completely from RAM, weighs ~27MB and boots in ~5s (YMMV).	Otto automatically builds development environments without any configuration; it can detect your project type and has built-in knowledge of industry-standard tools to setup a development environment that is ready to go. When you're ready to deploy, otto builds and manages an infrastructure, sets up servers, builds, and deploys the application.
Boxes;Up And SSH;Synced Folders;Provisioning;Networking;Share;Teardown;Rebuild;Providers	Kernel 3.14.1 with AUFS, Docker 0.10.1, LXC 0.8.0;Container persistence via disk automount on /var/lib/docker;SSH keys persistence via disk automount	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 8.3K	GitHub Stars 4.2K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 1.3K	GitHub Forks 214
Stacks 11.9K	Stacks 263	Stacks 27
Followers 7.8K	Followers 211	Followers 86
Votes 1.5K	Votes 95	Votes 18
Pros & Cons
Pros 352 Development environments 290 Simple bootstraping 237 Free 139 Boxes 130 Provisioning Cons 2 Can become v complex w prod. provisioner (Salt, etc.) 2 Multiple VMs quickly eat up disk space 1 Development environment that kills your battery	Pros 43 Lightweight 35 Use docker when it's not natively possible 11 Use it for fast demo without big image 3 Easy to use 3 Containers	Pros 11 Vagrant-like 4 Written in golang 3 Hashicorp built
Integrations
Amazon EC2 Microsoft Azure DigitalOcean HP Cloud Compute Joyent Cloud Rackspace Cloud Servers SoftLayer VirtualBox	Docker VirtualBox	Docker Consul Terraform

What are some alternatives to Vagrant, boot2docker, Otto?

libvirt

It is an open-source API, daemon and management tool for managing platform virtualization. It can be used to manage KVM, Xen, VMware ESXi, QEMU and other virtualization technologies.

Azk

azk lets developers easily and quickly install and configure development environments on their computers.

XenServer

It is a leading virtualization management platform optimized for application, desktop and server virtualization infrastructures. It is used in the world's largest clouds and enterprises.

VMware ESXi

It is a bare metal hypervisor that installs easily on to your server and partitions it into multiple virtual machines. It effectively partitions hardware to consolidate applications and cut costs.

Xen Orchestra

It provides a web based UI for the management of XenServer installations without requiring any agent or extra software on your hosts nor VMs.

PuPHPet

It is a web application that allows you to easily and quickly generate custom Vagrant and Puppet controlled virtual machines.

KubeVirt

It addresses the needs of development teams that have adopted or want to adopt Kubernetes but possess existing Virtual Machine-based workloads that cannot be easily containerized. More specifically, the technology provides a unified development platform where developers can build, modify, and deploy applications residing in both Application Containers as well as Virtual Machines in a common, shared environment.

Azure Arc

It offers simplified management, faster app development, and consistent Azure services. Easily organize, govern, and secure Windows, Linux, SQL Server, and Kubernetes clusters across data centers, the edge, and multi-cloud environments right from Azure. Architect, design, and build cloud-native apps anywhere without sacrificing central visibility and control. Get Azure innovation and cloud benefits by deploying consistent Azure data, application, and machine learning services on any infrastructure.

Related Comparisons

Otto vs Vagrant vs boot2docker: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Resource Efficiency**: Otto uses HashiCorp's Packer, Terraform, and Consul under the hood, making it lightweight and efficient in resource usage compared to Vagrant and boot2docker.
   
2. **Provisioning Flexibility**: Unlike Vagrant, Otto provides built-in support for various provisioners like Ansible, Chef, and Puppet, offering more flexibility in configuring and managing environments.
   
3. **Containerization Support**: Otto focuses on orchestrating and managing containers using tools like Docker, making it more suitable for container-based development compared to Vagrant and boot2docker.
   
4. **Unified Workflow**: Otto offers a unified workflow for building, deploying, and managing applications, integrating various tools seamlessly, which might require separate setups in Vagrant and boot2docker.
   
5. **Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) Integration**: Otto comes with features that streamline CI/CD processes, enabling smoother automation compared to Vagrant and boot2docker, which may require additional configurations for CI/CD pipelines.
   
6. **Scalability**: Otto is built with scalability in mind, allowing easy scaling of environments and applications, making it more suitable for projects requiring scalability compared to Vagrant and boot2docker.

In Summary, Otto offers resource efficiency, provisioning flexibility, containerization support, a unified workflow, CI/CD integration, and scalability advantages over Vagrant and boot2docker.

Otto vs Vagrant vs boot2docker

Overview