Browserling vs Karma vs Rainforest QA


+ 1

+ 1
Rainforest QA
Rainforest QA

+ 1
- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Browserling?

We run the browsers on our servers. Fully interactive sessions, not static screenshots. No flash, no applets, nothing to install. Powered entirely by <canvas> and javascript.

What is Karma?

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

What is Rainforest QA?

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Browserling?
Why do developers choose Karma?
Why do developers choose Rainforest QA?
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    What are the cons of using Browserling?
    What are the cons of using Karma?
    What are the cons of using Rainforest QA?
      Be the first to leave a con
        Be the first to leave a con
          Be the first to leave a con
          What companies use Browserling?
          What companies use Karma?
          What companies use Rainforest QA?

          Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

          What tools integrate with Browserling?
          What tools integrate with Karma?
          What tools integrate with Rainforest QA?
            No integrations found

            Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

            What are some alternatives to Browserling, Karma, and Rainforest QA?
            Live, Web-Based Browser Testing Instant access to all real mobile and desktop browsers. Say goodbye to your lab of devices and virtual machines.
            Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
            LambdaTest is a cloud-based testing platform and it provides access to a powerful network cloud of 2000+ real browsers and operating system that helps testers in cross-browser and cross-platform compatibility testing.
            Sauce Labs
            Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.
            Nightwatch.js is an easy to use Node.js based End-to-End (E2E) testing solution for browser based apps and websites. It uses the powerful Selenium WebDriver API to perform commands and assertions on DOM elements.
            See all alternatives
            Decisions about Browserling, Karma, and Rainforest QA
            No stack decisions found
            Interest over time
            Reviews of Browserling, Karma, and Rainforest QA
            Review ofRainforest QARainforest QA

            As a PM with a fair amount of testing experience I've been using Rainforest QA to build up a functional test suite for our web app. Writing tests is straightforward and it's nice to then get real humans executing the tests so that you can get readable feedback when something isn't working. I'd certainly recommend giving it a try to see if it might fit your workflow.

            How developers use Browserling, Karma, and Rainforest QA
            Avatar of LUMA Institute
            LUMA Institute uses Rainforest QARainforest QA

            Automated end-to-end testing that gets our code and user experiences tested more quickly. Can be scripted. Great in a continuous delivery model.

            Avatar of Riderman De Sousa Barbosa
            Riderman De Sousa Barbosa uses KarmaKarma

            All services, directives and controllers from angular are tested using Karma.

            Avatar of Ron Apelbaum
            Ron Apelbaum uses KarmaKarma

            I use Karma as a test runner for javascript unit tests

            Avatar of Giovanni Candido da Silva
            Giovanni Candido da Silva uses KarmaKarma

            Run unit and integration tests on real browsers

            Avatar of Glib Ischenko
            Glib Ischenko uses KarmaKarma

            Running Unit tests for Angular UI

            Avatar of Typeform
            Typeform uses KarmaKarma

            Testing frontend of admin part

            How much does Browserling cost?
            How much does Karma cost?
            How much does Rainforest QA cost?
            Pricing unavailable
            Pricing unavailable
            News about Browserling
            More news
            News about Karma
            More news
            News about Rainforest QA
            More news