Browserling vs Nemo.js vs Rainforest QA

Browserling
Browserling

6
9
0
Nemo.js
Nemo.js

2
11
0
Rainforest QA
Rainforest QA

23
29
52
- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Browserling?

We run the browsers on our servers. Fully interactive sessions, not static screenshots. No flash, no applets, nothing to install. Powered entirely by <canvas> and javascript.

What is Nemo.js?

Nemo provides a simple way to add selenium automation to your NodeJS web projects. Provides plugin architecture to incorporate custom features to your tests.

What is Rainforest QA?

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Browserling?
Why do developers choose Nemo.js?
Why do developers choose Rainforest QA?
    Be the first to leave a pro
      Be the first to leave a pro

      Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

      What are the cons of using Browserling?
      What are the cons of using Nemo.js?
      What are the cons of using Rainforest QA?
        Be the first to leave a con
          Be the first to leave a con
            Be the first to leave a con
            What companies use Browserling?
            What companies use Nemo.js?
            What companies use Rainforest QA?

            Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

            What tools integrate with Browserling?
            What tools integrate with Nemo.js?
            What tools integrate with Rainforest QA?
              No integrations found

              Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

              What are some alternatives to Browserling, Nemo.js, and Rainforest QA?
              BrowserStack
              Live, Web-Based Browser Testing Instant access to all real mobile and desktop browsers. Say goodbye to your lab of devices and virtual machines.
              Selenium
              Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
              Karma
              Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.
              LambdaTest
              LambdaTest is a cloud-based testing platform and it provides access to a powerful network cloud of 2000+ real browsers and operating system that helps testers in cross-browser and cross-platform compatibility testing.
              Sauce Labs
              Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.
              See all alternatives
              Decisions about Browserling, Nemo.js, and Rainforest QA
              No stack decisions found
              Interest over time
              Reviews of Browserling, Nemo.js, and Rainforest QA
              Review ofRainforest QARainforest QA

              As a PM with a fair amount of testing experience I've been using Rainforest QA to build up a functional test suite for our web app. Writing tests is straightforward and it's nice to then get real humans executing the tests so that you can get readable feedback when something isn't working. I'd certainly recommend giving it a try to see if it might fit your workflow.

              How developers use Browserling, Nemo.js, and Rainforest QA
              Avatar of LUMA Institute
              LUMA Institute uses Rainforest QARainforest QA

              Automated end-to-end testing that gets our code and user experiences tested more quickly. Can be scripted. Great in a continuous delivery model.

              How much does Browserling cost?
              How much does Nemo.js cost?
              How much does Rainforest QA cost?
              Pricing unavailable
              Pricing unavailable
              News about Browserling
              More news
              News about Nemo.js
              More news
              News about Rainforest QA
              More news