Buffer vs Swat.io: What are the differences?
Developers describe Buffer as "The easiest way to schedule tweets, Facebook posts and more". Buffer helps you manage multiple social media accounts at once. Quickly schedule content from anywhere on the web, collaborate with team members, and analyze rich statistics on how your posts perform. On the other hand, Swat.io is detailed as "Social Media Management for Teams". The Enterprise & Agency Solution for Content Planning, Community Management and Social Customer Service.
Buffer and Swat.io belong to "Social Media Tools" category of the tech stack.
What is Buffer?
What is Swat.io?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Swat.io?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Swat.io?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Huge time saver. I used to tweet from the Leanstack account in real-time. Then I somehow found out that people don’t actually do that anymore. I had heard of Buffer somehow, so I tried it out and was on the free tier for a while. Then I realized I could save a ton of time by just scheduling tweets once/week. Then I hit the Free plan limit, and I upgraded and started the once/week scheduling. I’ve been happy ever since. Protip: use the “Shuffle” feature after scheduling a lot of tweets at once to mix it up a bit
Honestly have not yet used Buffer in this particular stack, but with past experience using it and a personal inclination towards Buffer for social media management, we intend to handle syndicated and scheduled social media content to Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn using them.
We use Buffer for general social media management, especially in terms of analytics and general oversight.
We use Buffer to plan our important tweets like reminders for call for speakers, registration, etc.