Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AWS CodePipeline vs Buildkite: What are the differences?
AWS CodePipeline and Buildkite are two popular continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) tools used by developers to automate the software development process. Below are key differences between AWS CodePipeline and Buildkite:
Integration with AWS Services: AWS CodePipeline is tightly integrated with various AWS services, providing seamless integration with services such as AWS CodeBuild and AWS Elastic Beanstalk. In contrast, Buildkite is designed to be platform agnostic, allowing users to easily integrate with a wide range of third-party tools and services beyond the AWS ecosystem.
Pricing Model: AWS CodePipeline follows a consumption-based pricing model where users are charged based on the number of pipelines they run and the minutes it takes to execute those pipelines. On the other hand, Buildkite offers a transparent pricing model based on the number of concurrent jobs, with no charges for the number of pipelines or minutes executed.
Customization and Extensibility: Buildkite provides extensive customization and extensibility options through its rich plugin ecosystem, allowing users to tailor their CI/CD pipelines to their specific needs. In comparison, AWS CodePipeline offers limited customization options and relies more on integration with other AWS services for extending its functionality.
Ease of Setup and Configuration: Buildkite is known for its simplicity and ease of setup, enabling developers to get started with creating pipelines quickly and efficiently. AWS CodePipeline, being part of the AWS ecosystem, can have a steeper learning curve due to the complexity of managing AWS resources and configurations required for setting up pipelines.
Scalability: AWS CodePipeline is designed for scalability, allowing users to easily scale their pipelines based on the needs of their projects. Buildkite, while also scalable, may require additional configuration and setup to scale pipelines across a large number of concurrent jobs or complex workflows.
Community Support: Buildkite boasts a strong and active community of users and contributors who provide support, share best practices, and contribute to the development of plugins and integrations. On the other hand, AWS CodePipeline, being a proprietary AWS service, may have limited community support outside of official AWS documentation and support channels.
In Summary, AWS CodePipeline offers seamless integration with AWS services and a consumption-based pricing model, while Buildkite provides extensive customization options, transparent pricing, and a strong community support.
Pros of AWS CodePipeline
- Simple to set up13
- Managed service8
- GitHub integration4
- Parallel Execution3
- Automatic deployment2
- Manual Steps Available0
Pros of Buildkite
- Great customer support18
- Github integration17
- Easy to use16
- Easy setup16
- Simplicity12
- Simple deployments10
- Simple and powerful configuration9
- Bitbucket integration4
- Github enterprise integration3
- Amazing swag3
- Integrates with everything2
- Sourcecode is hosted by source code owner.1
- Configuration in cloud1
- Run your own test containers with their AWS stack file1
- Superior user experience1
- Great ui1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of AWS CodePipeline
- No project boards2
- No integration with "Power" 365 tools1