StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Caddy vs Passenger vs nginx

Caddy vs Passenger vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K
Passenger
Passenger
Stacks1.4K
Followers298
Votes199
GitHub Stars5.1K
Forks557
Caddy
Caddy
Stacks363
Followers282
Votes20
GitHub Stars67.7K
Forks4.5K

Caddy vs Passenger vs nginx: What are the differences?

1. **Deployment Mode**: Caddy is designed for simple and quick deployment with its automatic HTTPS feature enabled by default. Passenger, on the other hand, is a Ruby application server that can handle multiple applications and is more suitable for complex setups. Nginx is a general-purpose web server that is highly configurable and commonly used for reverse proxy setups. 2. **Ease of Configuration**: Caddy emphasizes a simple configuration approach with a Caddyfile that is easy to understand and configure. Passenger provides more flexibility in configuration options but requires a deeper understanding of its various settings. Nginx offers extensive configuration options and scalability but requires more knowledge and expertise to set up effectively. 3. **Support for Languages**: Passenger primarily focuses on Ruby applications, providing features like auto-scaling and monitoring for Ruby on Rails apps. Caddy supports various languages and frameworks, including PHP, Python, and Go, making it versatile for different types of projects. Nginx also supports multiple languages and frameworks, making it a popular choice for diverse applications. 4. **Performance and Scalability**: Caddy is known for its simplicity and lightweight design, making it suitable for small to medium-sized projects with high performance requirements. Passenger offers robust performance and scalability for Ruby applications, handling large workloads efficiently. Nginx is widely recognized for its high performance and scalability, making it a preferred choice for large-scale applications and high-traffic websites. 5. **Community and Support**: Caddy has a growing community and active support but may lack the extensive resources compared to more established servers like Nginx. Passenger benefits from a strong community of Ruby developers and continuous support from the Phusion team, ensuring reliable assistance for users. Nginx has a vast community of users and comprehensive documentation, making it easy to find solutions and support for various issues. 6. **License and Cost**: Caddy is open-source with a permissive license that allows for free usage and modification. Passenger is also open-source but offers a paid enterprise version with additional features and support. Nginx is open-source and free to use, but there is a commercial version available with advanced functionality and support options.

In Summary, Caddy, Passenger, and Nginx offer unique advantages in deployment mode, configuration, language support, performance, community, and cost, catering to different needs and preferences in web server solutions.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NGINX, Passenger, Caddy

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
Grant
Grant

Developer at GMS LLC

Sep 5, 2020

Decided
  • Server rendered HTML output from PHP is being migrated to the client as Vue.js components, future plans to provide additional content, and other new miscellaneous features all result in a substantial increase of static files needing to be served from the server. NGINX has better performance than Apache for serving static content.
  • The change to NGINX will require switching from PHP to PHP-FPM resulting in a distributed architecture with a higher complexity configuration, but this is outweighed by PHP-FPM being faster than PHP for processing requests.
  • The NGINX + PHP-FPM setup now allows for horizontally scaling of resources rather vertically scaling the previously combined Apache + PHP resources.
  • PHP shell tasks can now efficiently be decoupled from the application reducing main application footprint and allow for scaling of tasks on an individual basis.
429k views429k
Comments
jlp78
jlp78

May 31, 2019

ReviewonNGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

727k views727k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NGINX
NGINX
Passenger
Passenger
Caddy
Caddy

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Caddy 2 is a powerful, enterprise-ready, open source web server with automatic HTTPS written in Go.

--
Static file server; Reverse proxy; Load balancing; Automatic HTTPS; TLS by default; Caddyfile; Config API; Config adapters; HTTP/1.1; HTTP/2; HTTP/3; Virtual hosting; TLS ceritificate auto-renew; Extensible; No dependencies; Fewer moving parts
Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Stars
5.1K
GitHub Stars
67.7K
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
557
GitHub Forks
4.5K
Stacks
115.0K
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
363
Followers
61.9K
Followers
298
Followers
282
Votes
5.5K
Votes
199
Votes
20
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
Pros
  • 43
    Nginx integration
  • 36
    Great for rails
  • 21
    Fast web server
  • 19
    Free
  • 15
    Lightweight
Cons
  • 0
    Cost (some features require paid/pro)
Pros
  • 6
    Sane config file syntax
  • 6
    Easy HTTP/2 Server Push
  • 4
    Builtin HTTPS
  • 2
    Runtime config API
  • 2
    Letsencrypt support
Cons
  • 3
    New kid
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python
Ruby
Ruby
Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Node.js
Node.js
Meteor
Meteor
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to NGINX, Passenger, Caddy?

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Cowboy

Cowboy

Cowboy aims to provide a complete HTTP stack in a small code base. It is optimized for low latency and low memory usage, in part because it uses binary strings. Cowboy provides routing capabilities, selectively dispatching requests to handlers written in Erlang.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase