StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Server Configuration And Automation
  5. Capistrano vs Rundeck

Capistrano vs Rundeck

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Capistrano
Capistrano
Stacks1.5K
Followers647
Votes232
GitHub Stars12.9K
Forks1.8K
Rundeck
Rundeck
Stacks204
Followers343
Votes7

Capistrano vs Rundeck: What are the differences?

Comparison between Capistrano and Rundeck for Website

Capistrano and Rundeck are both popular automation tools used in deployment and management processes. Here are the key differences between Capistrano and Rundeck:

  1. Deployment type: Capistrano is primarily used for code deployment, especially in Ruby on Rails applications, while Rundeck focuses on general-purpose automation with support for various scripting languages and workflows.

  2. Interface design: Capistrano requires coding knowledge for defining deployment tasks in Ruby scripts, whereas Rundeck provides a user-friendly web interface for defining and executing jobs without coding expertise.

  3. Scalability: Capistrano is more suitable for small to medium-sized projects due to its focus on code deployments, whereas Rundeck excels in handling large-scale automation tasks across multiple servers and environments.

  4. Workflow management: Rundeck offers advanced workflow management capabilities, allowing complex job orchestration and scheduling, while Capistrano is primarily designed for sequential deployments with limited workflow management features.

  5. Security features: Rundeck provides robust access control mechanisms, audit trails, and encryption features to ensure secure automation operations, while Capistrano lacks comprehensive security features and is more reliant on external security measures.

  6. Community and support: Capistrano has a strong community of Ruby developers contributing to its development and providing support, whereas Rundeck has a larger user base with more extensive documentation and enterprise support options available.

In Summary, Capistrano is ideal for code deployments in Ruby on Rails projects, while Rundeck offers a broader range of automation capabilities with a user-friendly interface and robust security features for large-scale automation tasks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Capistrano
Capistrano
Rundeck
Rundeck

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

A self-service operations platform used for support tasks, enterprise job scheduling, deployment, and more.

Reliably deploy web application to any number of machines simultaneously, in sequence or as a rolling set;Automate audits of any number of machines (checking login logs, enumerating uptimes, and/or applying security patches);Script arbitrary workflows over SSH;Automate common tasks in software teams;Drive infrastructure provisioning tools such as chef-solo, Ansible or similar
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
12.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.5K
Stacks
204
Followers
647
Followers
343
Votes
232
Votes
7
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 121
    Automated deployment with several custom recipes
  • 63
    Simple
  • 23
    Ruby
  • 11
    Release-folders with symlinks
  • 9
    Multistage deployment
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to understand
  • 3
    Role based access control
  • 1
    Doesn't need containers
Integrations
No integrations available
Ansible
Ansible
Jenkins
Jenkins

What are some alternatives to Capistrano, Rundeck?

Ansible

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

Chef

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Puppet Labs

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

Salt

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Fabric

Fabric

Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution.

AWS OpsWorks

AWS OpsWorks

Start from templates for common technologies like Ruby, Node.JS, PHP, and Java, or build your own using Chef recipes to install software packages and perform any task that you can script. AWS OpsWorks can scale your application using automatic load-based or time-based scaling and maintain the health of your application by detecting failed instances and replacing them. You have full control of deployments and automation of each component

cPanel

cPanel

It is an industry leading hosting platform with world-class support. It is globally empowering hosting providers through fully-automated point-and-click hosting platform by hosting-centric professionals

Webmin

Webmin

It is a web-based interface for system administration for Unix. Using any modern web browser, you can setup user accounts, Apache, DNS, file sharing and much more. It removes the need to manually edit Unix configuration files.

Mina

Mina

Mina works really fast because it's a deploy Bash script generator. It generates an entire procedure as a Bash script and runs it remotely in the server. Compare this to the likes of Vlad or Capistrano, where each command is run separately on their own SSH sessions. Mina only creates one SSH session per deploy, minimizing the SSH connection overhead.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana