Home
DevOps
Build, Test, Deploy
Package Managers

Carthage vs Ninject

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Carthage
52
26
+ 1
0
Ninject
35
15
+ 1
0
Add tool

Carthage vs Ninject: What are the differences?

Developers describe Carthage as "A simple, decentralized dependency manager for Cocoa". It exclusively uses dynamic frameworks instead of static libraries. It's a ruthlessly simple dependency manager for macOS and iOS, created by a group of developers from Github. On the other hand, Ninject is detailed as "The ninja of .net dependency injectors". It is a lightning-fast, ultra-lightweight dependency injector for .NET applications. It helps you split your application into a collection of loosely-coupled, highly-cohesive pieces, and then glue them back together in a flexible manner. By using it to support your software's architecture, your code will become easier to write, reuse, test, and modify.

Carthage and Ninject can be categorized as "Dependency Management" tools.

Carthage and Ninject are both open source tools. Carthage with 13.2K GitHub stars and 1.32K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Ninject with 2.25K GitHub stars and 522 GitHub forks.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More

What is Carthage?

It exclusively uses dynamic frameworks instead of static libraries. It's a ruthlessly simple dependency manager for macOS and iOS, created by a group of developers from Github.

What is Ninject?

It is a lightning-fast, ultra-lightweight dependency injector for .NET applications. It helps you split your application into a collection of loosely-coupled, highly-cohesive pieces, and then glue them back together in a flexible manner. By using it to support your software's architecture, your code will become easier to write, reuse, test, and modify.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Carthage?
What companies use Ninject?
See which teams inside your own company are using Carthage or Ninject.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Carthage?
What tools integrate with Ninject?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Carthage and Ninject?
CocoaPods
It supports almost every way you would want to get source code, git, svn, bzr, http and hg. You can use your own private code repository to manage your own dependencies. It only requires a git repo, no server necessary.
Salt
Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.
Rome
It is an experimental JavaScript toolchain. It includes a compiler, linter, formatter, bundler, testing framework and more. It aims to be a comprehensive tool for anything related to the processing of JavaScript source code.
SPM
Cloud and On Premises Performance Monitoring, Alerting, and Anomaly Detection with Log Correlation, Events, and Custom Metrics.
RubyGems
It is a package manager for the Ruby programming language that provides a standard format for distributing Ruby programs and libraries, a tool designed to easily manage the installation of gems, and a server for distributing them.
See all alternatives

Related Comparisons

Bundler vs CarthageNinject vs UnityCocos2D-X vs NinjectAmethyst vs NinjectCarthage vs CocoaPods

Trending Comparisons

Django vs Laravel vs Node.jsBootstrap vs Foundation vs Material-UINode.js vs Spring BootFlyway vs LiquibaseAWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Top Comparisons

Bootstrap vs MaterializeHipChat vs Mattermost vs SlackBitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLabPostman vs Swagger UI