Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Cassandra

3.6K
3.5K
+ 1
507
Riak

104
137
+ 1
44
Add tool

Cassandra vs Riak: What are the differences?

  1. Data Model: Cassandra uses a wide-column store data model, while Riak follows the key-value store data model. This means that Cassandra organizes data into columns within rows, similar to a table, while Riak stores data as key-value pairs without a fixed schema.
  2. Consistency Model: Cassandra employs eventual consistency by default, allowing data to be inconsistent for a period and then reconciled. In contrast, Riak offers tunable consistency, allowing users to choose between strong consistency or eventual consistency based on their requirements.
  3. Partitioning: Cassandra uses consistent hashing for partitioning data across multiple nodes but relies on a coordinator node to handle requests. Riak, on the other hand, uses a decentralized partitioning strategy where each node is responsible for a subset of the keyspace, enabling high availability and scalability without a single point of failure.
  4. Concurrency Control: Cassandra uses the Last-Write-Wins (LWW) conflict resolution strategy, where the most recent write takes precedence in case of conflicts. Riak, however, uses vector clocks to track causal relationships between updates, allowing for more sophisticated conflict resolution and the ability to handle divergent replicas.
  5. Secondary Indexes: Cassandra supports secondary indexes that enable querying on non-primary key fields, but they come with performance trade-offs. Riak, on the other hand, offers search capabilities through full-text search integration with tools like Riak Search or external indexing solutions.
  6. Deployment Flexibility: Cassandra is designed for horizontal scalability and is typically deployed in clusters spanning multiple data centers for high availability and fault tolerance. Riak, while also scalable, is often chosen for its deployment simplicity, flexibility, and ease of use in premises with less complex setup requirements.

In Summary, Cassandra and Riak differ in their data models, consistency models, partitioning strategies, concurrency control mechanisms, support for secondary indexes, and deployment flexibility.

Advice on Cassandra and Riak
Umair Iftikhar
Technical Architect at ERP Studio · | 3 upvotes · 449.7K views
Needs advice
on
CassandraCassandraDruidDruid
and
TimescaleDBTimescaleDB

Developing a solution that collects Telemetry Data from different devices, nearly 1000 devices minimum and maximum 12000. Each device is sending 2 packets in 1 second. This is time-series data, and this data definition and different reports are saved on PostgreSQL. Like Building information, maintenance records, etc. I want to know about the best solution. This data is required for Math and ML to run different algorithms. Also, data is raw without definitions and information stored in PostgreSQL. Initially, I went with TimescaleDB due to PostgreSQL support, but to increase in sites, I started facing many issues with timescale DB in terms of flexibility of storing data.

My major requirement is also the replication of the database for reporting and different purposes. You may also suggest other options other than Druid and Cassandra. But an open source solution is appreciated.

See more
Replies (1)
Recommends
on
MongoDBMongoDB

Hi Umair, Did you try MongoDB. We are using MongoDB on a production environment and collecting data from devices like your scenario. We have a MongoDB cluster with three replicas. Data from devices are being written to the master node and real-time dashboard UI is using the secondary nodes for read operations. With this setup write operations are not affected by read operations too.

See more
Vinay Mehta
Needs advice
on
CassandraCassandra
and
ScyllaDBScyllaDB

The problem I have is - we need to process & change(update/insert) 55M Data every 2 min and this updated data to be available for Rest API for Filtering / Selection. Response time for Rest API should be less than 1 sec.

The most important factors for me are processing and storing time of 2 min. There need to be 2 views of Data One is for Selection & 2. Changed data.

See more
Replies (4)
Recommends
on
ScyllaDBScyllaDB

Scylla can handle 1M/s events with a simple data model quite easily. The api to query is CQL, we have REST api but that's for control/monitoring

See more
Alex Peake
Recommends
on
CassandraCassandra

Cassandra is quite capable of the task, in a highly available way, given appropriate scaling of the system. Remember that updates are only inserts, and that efficient retrieval is only by key (which can be a complex key). Talking of keys, make sure that the keys are well distributed.

See more
Pankaj Soni
Chief Technical Officer at Software Joint · | 2 upvotes · 161.6K views
Recommends
on
CassandraCassandra

i love syclla for pet projects however it's license which is based on server model is an issue. thus i recommend cassandra

See more
Recommends
on
ScyllaDBScyllaDB

By 55M do you mean 55 million entity changes per 2 minutes? It is relatively high, means almost 460k per second. If I had to choose between Scylla or Cassandra, I would opt for Scylla as it is promising better performance for simple operations. However, maybe it would be worth to consider yet another alternative technology. Take into consideration required consistency, reliability and high availability and you may realize that there are more suitable once. Rest API should not be the main driver, because you can always develop the API yourself, if not supported by given technology.

See more
Decisions about Cassandra and Riak
Micha Mailänder
CEO & Co-Founder at Dechea · | 14 upvotes · 85.9K views

Fauna is a serverless database where you store data as JSON. Also, you have build in a HTTP GraphQL interface with a full authentication & authorization layer. That means you can skip your Backend and call it directly from the Frontend. With the power, that you can write data transformation function within Fauna with her own language called FQL, we're getting a blazing fast application.

Also, Fauna takes care about scaling and backups (All data are sharded on three different locations on the globe). That means we can fully focus on writing business logic and don't have to worry anymore about infrastructure.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Cassandra
Pros of Riak
  • 119
    Distributed
  • 98
    High performance
  • 81
    High availability
  • 74
    Easy scalability
  • 53
    Replication
  • 26
    Reliable
  • 26
    Multi datacenter deployments
  • 10
    Schema optional
  • 9
    OLTP
  • 8
    Open source
  • 2
    Workload separation (via MDC)
  • 1
    Fast
  • 14
    High Performance
  • 11
    High Availability
  • 9
    Easy Scalability
  • 5
    Flexible
  • 1
    Strong Consistency
  • 1
    Eventual Consistency
  • 1
    Distributed
  • 1
    Multi datacenter deployments
  • 1
    Reliable

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Cassandra
Cons of Riak
  • 3
    Reliability of replication
  • 1
    Size
  • 1
    Updates
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Cassandra?

    Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

    What is Riak?

    Riak is a distributed database designed to deliver maximum data availability by distributing data across multiple servers. As long as your client can reach one Riak server, it should be able to write data. In most failure scenarios, the data you want to read should be available, although it may not be the most up-to-date version of that data.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Cassandra?
    What companies use Riak?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Cassandra?
    What tools integrate with Riak?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Cassandra and Riak?
    HBase
    Apache HBase is an open-source, distributed, versioned, column-oriented store modeled after Google' Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data by Chang et al. Just as Bigtable leverages the distributed data storage provided by the Google File System, HBase provides Bigtable-like capabilities on top of Apache Hadoop.
    Google Cloud Bigtable
    Google Cloud Bigtable offers you a fast, fully managed, massively scalable NoSQL database service that's ideal for web, mobile, and Internet of Things applications requiring terabytes to petabytes of data. Unlike comparable market offerings, Cloud Bigtable doesn't require you to sacrifice speed, scale, or cost efficiency when your applications grow. Cloud Bigtable has been battle-tested at Google for more than 10 years—it's the database driving major applications such as Google Analytics and Gmail.
    Hadoop
    The Apache Hadoop software library is a framework that allows for the distributed processing of large data sets across clusters of computers using simple programming models. It is designed to scale up from single servers to thousands of machines, each offering local computation and storage.
    Redis
    Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.
    Couchbase
    Developed as an alternative to traditionally inflexible SQL databases, the Couchbase NoSQL database is built on an open source foundation and architected to help developers solve real-world problems and meet high scalability demands.
    See all alternatives