Celery vs IronMQ vs Kafka Manager

Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Celery
Celery

936
586
+ 1
239
IronMQ
IronMQ

30
34
+ 1
34
Kafka Manager
Kafka Manager

40
50
+ 1
1
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Celery?

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

What is IronMQ?

An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance.

What is Kafka Manager?

This interface makes it easier to identify topics which are unevenly distributed across the cluster or have partition leaders unevenly distributed across the cluster. It supports management of multiple clusters, preferred replica election, replica re-assignment, and topic creation. It is also great for getting a quick bird’s eye view of the cluster.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Celery?
Why do developers choose IronMQ?
Why do developers choose Kafka Manager?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    Be the first to leave a con
    What companies use Celery?
    What companies use IronMQ?
    What companies use Kafka Manager?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Celery?
    What tools integrate with IronMQ?
    What tools integrate with Kafka Manager?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Celery, IronMQ, and Kafka Manager?
    RabbitMQ
    RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
    Kafka
    Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
    Amazon SQS
    Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.
    ActiveMQ
    Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.
    ZeroMQ
    The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.
    See all alternatives
    Decisions about Celery, IronMQ, and Kafka Manager
    No stack decisions found
    Interest over time
    Reviews of Celery, IronMQ, and Kafka Manager
    Avatar of umuro
    Co-Founder at Publitory
    Review ofIronMQIronMQ

    I deploy to Heroku. However, my applications require full linux applications that cannot be deployed to Heroku. I deploy them to Rackspace.

    Then Heroku and Rackspace communicate over IronMQ. Problem solved.

    How developers use Celery, IronMQ, and Kafka Manager
    Avatar of Kalibrr
    Kalibrr uses CeleryCelery

    All of our background jobs (e.g., image resizing, file uploading, email and SMS sending) are done through Celery (using Redis as its broker). Celery's scheduling and retrying features are especially useful for error-prone tasks, such as email and SMS sending.

    Avatar of Cloudify
    Cloudify uses CeleryCelery

    For orchestrating the creation of the correct number of instances, managing errors and retries, and finally managing the deallocation of resources we use RabbitMQ in conjunction with the Celery Project framework, along with a self-developed workflow engine.

    Avatar of MOKA Analytics
    MOKA Analytics uses CeleryCelery

    We maintain a fork of Celery 3 that adds HTTPS support for Redis brokers. The Winning Model currently uses Celery 3 because Celery 4 dropped support for Windows.

    We plan on migrating to Celery 4 once Azure ASE supports Linux apps

    Avatar of Yaakov Gesher
    Yaakov Gesher uses CeleryCelery

    We used celery, in combination with RabbitMQ and celery-beat, to run periodic tasks, as well as some user-initiated long-running tasks on the server.

    Avatar of Dieter Adriaenssens
    Dieter Adriaenssens uses CeleryCelery

    Using Celery, the web service creates tasks that are executed by a background worker. Celery uses a RabbitMQ instance as a task queue.

    Avatar of True Fiction Production AB
    True Fiction Production AB uses IronMQIronMQ

    Process queues

    How much does Celery cost?
    How much does IronMQ cost?
    How much does Kafka Manager cost?
    Pricing unavailable
    Pricing unavailable
    News about Kafka Manager
    More news