Celery vs IronMQ vs Starling

Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Celery
Celery

846
501
+ 1
239
IronMQ
IronMQ

29
33
+ 1
34
Starling
Starling

3
5
+ 1
0
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Celery?

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

What is IronMQ?

An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance.

What is Starling?

Starling is a powerful but simple messaging server that enables reliable distributed queuing with an absolutely minimal overhead. It speaks the MemCache protocol for maximum cross-platform compatibility. Any language that speaks MemCache can take advantage of Starling's queue facilities.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Celery?
Why do developers choose IronMQ?
Why do developers choose Starling?
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    What are the cons of using Celery?
    What are the cons of using IronMQ?
    What are the cons of using Starling?
      Be the first to leave a con
      What companies use Celery?
      What companies use IronMQ?
      What companies use Starling?

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Celery?
      What tools integrate with IronMQ?
      What tools integrate with Starling?
        No integrations found

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        What are some alternatives to Celery, IronMQ, and Starling?
        RabbitMQ
        RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
        Kafka
        Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
        Amazon SQS
        Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.
        ActiveMQ
        Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.
        ZeroMQ
        The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.
        See all alternatives
        Decisions about Celery, IronMQ, and Starling
        No stack decisions found
        Interest over time
        Reviews of Celery, IronMQ, and Starling
        Avatar of umuro
        Co-Founder at Publitory
        Review ofIronMQIronMQ

        I deploy to Heroku. However, my applications require full linux applications that cannot be deployed to Heroku. I deploy them to Rackspace.

        Then Heroku and Rackspace communicate over IronMQ. Problem solved.

        How developers use Celery, IronMQ, and Starling
        Avatar of Kalibrr
        Kalibrr uses CeleryCelery

        All of our background jobs (e.g., image resizing, file uploading, email and SMS sending) are done through Celery (using Redis as its broker). Celery's scheduling and retrying features are especially useful for error-prone tasks, such as email and SMS sending.

        Avatar of Cloudify
        Cloudify uses CeleryCelery

        For orchestrating the creation of the correct number of instances, managing errors and retries, and finally managing the deallocation of resources we use RabbitMQ in conjunction with the Celery Project framework, along with a self-developed workflow engine.

        Avatar of MOKA Analytics
        MOKA Analytics uses CeleryCelery

        We maintain a fork of Celery 3 that adds HTTPS support for Redis brokers. The Winning Model currently uses Celery 3 because Celery 4 dropped support for Windows.

        We plan on migrating to Celery 4 once Azure ASE supports Linux apps

        Avatar of Yaakov Gesher
        Yaakov Gesher uses CeleryCelery

        We used celery, in combination with RabbitMQ and celery-beat, to run periodic tasks, as well as some user-initiated long-running tasks on the server.

        Avatar of Dieter Adriaenssens
        Dieter Adriaenssens uses CeleryCelery

        Using Celery, the web service creates tasks that are executed by a background worker. Celery uses a RabbitMQ instance as a task queue.

        Avatar of True Fiction Production AB
        True Fiction Production AB uses IronMQIronMQ

        Process queues

        How much does Celery cost?
        How much does IronMQ cost?
        How much does Starling cost?
        Pricing unavailable
        Pricing unavailable