StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Checkstyle vs EditorConfig

Checkstyle vs EditorConfig

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Checkstyle
Checkstyle
Stacks132
Followers107
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.7K
Forks3.9K
EditorConfig
EditorConfig
Stacks259
Followers60
Votes2

Checkstyle vs EditorConfig: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Checkstyle and EditorConfig

Checkstyle and EditorConfig are both tools used in software development to enforce coding standards and maintain consistency in projects. Although they serve similar purposes, there are several key differences between them.

  1. Configuration Format: Checkstyle uses an XML-based configuration format, where rules and properties are defined in an XML file. On the other hand, EditorConfig uses a simple .editorconfig file format, which uses key-value pairs to specify coding styles.

  2. Flexibility of Rules: Checkstyle offers a wide range of rule options and configurations, allowing developers to customize and fine-tune the coding standards according to their specific needs. EditorConfig, on the other hand, has a more limited set of rules, focusing mainly on indentation and line ending styles.

  3. Integration with IDEs and Editors: Checkstyle provides extensive integrations with various IDEs and code editors, allowing developers to view and fix code violations directly within their development environment. EditorConfig, on the other hand, relies on plugins or extensions to be installed in the IDE or editor to enable its functionality.

  4. Supported Languages: Checkstyle is primarily used for Java projects and provides a comprehensive set of rules tailored for Java development. EditorConfig, however, supports a wider range of programming languages, including but not limited to Java, C/C++, Python, JavaScript, and more.

  5. Scope of Checks: Checkstyle not only focuses on coding style and formatting but also performs static analysis and detects potential bugs, coding anti-patterns, and other code quality issues. EditorConfig, on the other hand, primarily addresses formatting and indentation concerns, rather than analyzing code for quality or performance-related issues.

  6. Project-wide vs. File-specific: Checkstyle is typically configured at the project level, where rules apply to the entire codebase. EditorConfig, on the other hand, can be applied at both the project-wide level and on a per-file basis, allowing for more granular control over coding styles for individual files or directories.

In summary, Checkstyle offers more extensive rule customization, supports Java exclusively, and provides additional static analysis capabilities. On the other hand, EditorConfig focuses on simplicity, supports multiple programming languages, and allows for file-level configuration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Checkstyle
Checkstyle
EditorConfig
EditorConfig

It is a development tool to help programmers write Java code that adheres to a coding standard. It automates the process of checking Java code to spare humans of this boring (but important) task. This makes it ideal for projects that want to enforce a coding standard.

It is a file format and collection of text editor plugins. It helps maintain consistent coding styles for multiple developers working on the same project across various editors and IDEs.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
132
Stacks
259
Followers
107
Followers
60
Votes
0
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    Y6y
Integrations
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Java
Java
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Checkstyle , EditorConfig?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana