Cowboy vs. Cherokee vs. Puma

Get help choosing one of these Get news updates about these tools


Cowboy

Cherokee

Puma

Favorites

6

Favorites

0

Favorites

12

Hacker News, Reddit, Stack Overflow Stats

  • 12
  • 112
  • 192
  • 67
  • 70
  • 70
  • 267
  • 78
  • 802

GitHub Stats

No public GitHub repository stats available

Description

What is Cowboy?

Cowboy aims to provide a complete HTTP stack in a small code base. It is optimized for low latency and low memory usage, in part because it uses binary strings. Cowboy provides routing capabilities, selectively dispatching requests to handlers written in Erlang.

What is Cherokee?

Cherokee is highly efficient, extremely lightweight and provides rock solid stability. Among its many features there is one that deserves special credit: a user friendly interface called cherokee-admin that is provided for a no-hassle configuration of every single feature of the server.

What is Puma?

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Pros about this tool

Why do you like Cowboy?

Why do you like Cherokee?

Why do you like Puma?

Cons about this tool

Pricing

Cowboy Pricing

Customers

Latest News

From Code Cowboy to Infrastructure Architect
Unicorn vs. Puma vs. Passenger: which app server is ...


Interest Over Time


Get help choosing one of these