Puma vs. lighttpd vs. Cherokee

Get help choosing one of these Get news updates about these tools


Puma

lighttpd

Cherokee

Favorites

12

Favorites

1

Favorites

0

Hacker News, Reddit, Stack Overflow Stats

  • 267
  • 78
  • 783
  • 41
  • 138
  • 984
  • 67
  • 70
  • 70

GitHub Stats

No public GitHub repository stats available
No public GitHub repository stats available

Description

What is Puma?

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

What is lighttpd?

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

What is Cherokee?

Cherokee is highly efficient, extremely lightweight and provides rock solid stability. Among its many features there is one that deserves special credit: a user friendly interface called cherokee-admin that is provided for a no-hassle configuration of every single feature of the server.

Pros about this tool

Why do you like Puma?

Why do you like lighttpd?

Why do you like Cherokee?

Cons about this tool

Customers

Integrations

Latest News

Unicorn vs. Puma vs. Passenger: which app server is ...


Interest Over Time


Get help choosing one of these